Preview

compare and contrast of feudal systems in Japan and Europe

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
494 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
compare and contrast of feudal systems in Japan and Europe
Japanese feudal system during the Kamakaru Shogunate from 1100 to 1868 and Europe’s feudal system during the middle ages from the 800’s to the 1600’s were similar regarding warriors and weapons, considering that they were based on similar codes of conduct and weaponry, were similar in their socio-political division that had a similar hereditary hierarchy, but the treatment of women differed in that women were allowed to serve in Japanese warrior class but not in the European’s. European knights were very similar to the Japanese samurais; not only were they similar in their codes of conduct, but they had similar weaponry. The Knights were based on Chivalry which consisted bravery, respect and honor. The Samurais followed a similar code of conduct called bushido meaning “the way of the warrior” which consisted of loyalty, bravery in the martial arts, and honor until death. The similarity in their weapons was the use of swords, horses, small knifes, and armor. Although Europeans had a much heavier armor made of metal which immobilized knights, Japanese armor can still be compared to the armor of the knights. Reasons for this similarity is that both systems were faced with constant warfare, and their conducts were somewhat based on religion although Japan basing bushido from Confucianism and Europe basing chivalry from Catholicism.
The socio political divisions of Japan and Europe are similar in that they are both stratified hierarchy. They both had hereditary classes of nobles, warriors, and peasants and serfs. Constant warfare in both Japan and Europe made the warrior class the most prominent. In Japan, since the Mongols wanted to attack the Japanese were always prepared and lived in terror. Japanese and Europeans also built protective castles. Like in Europe the kings gave land fiefs to vassals, Shoguns distributed land to his followers. In both feudal systems warriors served local lords. While lords offered payment and protection vassals provided loyalty.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    During the Tokugawa period of Japan a singular map consisted of numerous feudal towns and villages each ruled by individual daimyo lords. The list of individual domains was enormous, so too was the list of cultures, traditions, and material goods specific to the domains and feudal families that lived within the domain’s borders. The right to govern each domain was given to a daimyo lord by the Tokugawa Shogunate; in return, each ruling vassal was required to complete a “form of feudal service.” Known as alternate attendance the Shogun imposed this requirement as a means of political and economic control which restricted individual daimyo rule and reinforced the overall power of the Shogunate. While alternate attendance was a mechanism of political control that promoted peace throughout Japan, Constantine Nomikos Vaporis illustrated the unintentional effects of the hegemon’s policy in Tour of Duty. Vaporis argued that alternate attendance, while considered a “disciplinary institution” by other Japanese scholars, was nevertheless “instrumental in producing a population with a high level of shared culture and experience.”…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    To compare the ranks they are very similar I.E the merchants in feudal japan were similar to those of the European one (Serfs/Peseants). Feudal Japanese and European societies were built on a system of hereditary classes. The nobles were at the top, followed by the warriors, with tenant farmers or serfs below them, there was very little social mobility. Between the classes.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine yourself as a Samurai, you are in the middle of defeating the European knights who are covered in plated armor. You begin to worry but then, you win, these are the reasons why a Samurai is better than a knight. Feudalism in Europe and Japan were both very similar. They both has rulers, and they both had rulers who hired nobles, and they both had nobles who hired landowners, and they both had landowners who hired warriors to protect the slaves and their land. If samurai and knights were to have fought against each other the samurai would have won because, they had movable armor and it was easier for them to dodge anything that a knight would slowly lunge at them with. If a Samurai and knights battled the knights would have fallen because, their armor was very defective. A knight's armor wasn’t made for easy movement, this made it more difficult for them to fight, but overall they were well protected(Document B). Their armor did defend them but, a Knight’s armor could easily be penetrated by a soldier…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 1450s, Japan was a place of turmoil and unrest. Angered by the high rents they had to pay, peasants began revolting against their lords. To quell this chaos, the lords began hiring samurai to put down the rebellions. Taking advantage of the situation, the samurai began making demands of these lords so that by the end of these revolts, most of the new daimyo were former samurai. With these new daimyo in power, they began to clash with one another. This infighting erupted into a civil war that eventually ended with no apparent victor. This became known as the “Era of Independent Lords”.…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The country was eventually reunited within the late 1500s, and a rigid social class structure was established throughout the Edo amount that placed the samurai at the highest, followed by the farmers, artisans and merchants severally. throughout now, the samurai were forced to measure in castle cities, were the sole ones allowed to possess and carry swords and were paid in rice by their daimyo or social structure lords. uncontrolled samurai were referred to as ronin and caused minor troubles throughout the 1600s.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the medieval ages, from fifth to fifteenth centuries, a kind of military service grew in Europe and Japan. Both of these warriors fought for their lord and swore loyalty to them, but they were both very different in many ways, one example is their names. The samurai from Japan and the knights from Europe. These warriors were more different because of their armour design, views on death, and hereditary loyalty to their lords.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Knights Dbq

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages

    To begin Knights and Samurai have a lot of common traits, but they also have differences. Traits that they both share are, they are warriors who protect their land. But a difference is that they have different weapons,armor,training and different religions. While knights and samurai have many similarities, in a one on one battle, the advantage would be given to the knight and this can be seen in their training,armor,and their Honor Code.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Samurai Knights Dbq

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Social Position: The first area of important similarities was social position. They have a comparison of both of their lords, lesser lords, kings, both military, classes and peasants. These similarities are significant because both Samurai and knights showed great loyalty to their lords.The samurai warriors who owed loyalty and military service to daimyos for land or regular payment. According to Document A: Social Pyramids, with families the Samurai’s made up to 10%of Japan's…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Samurai and Knights were different but the similarities were greater because of their rankings, training, armor, fighting technique, code of honor, and death viewpoint. The Japanese called their warriors Samurai, and the Europeans called their warriors Knights. They both swore oaths of loyalty to noble lords and fought to the death to defend them. This happened at the same time even though Japan and Europe were thousands of miles apart.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    All woman out there if you want to protect yourself and not rely on a man then you should become a samurai but if you want protection and respect then marry a knight. During the Middle Ages in Feudal Japan and in Europe samurai and knights were two of the bravest warriors. It is important to compare these two because you can see who is more respectful or more powerful. Samurai were sent to defeat barbarians in Northern Honshu. Samurai worked for landowners and offered them protection and loyalty in exchange for land and rights. Knights lived in their lord's castle because they protected their lord. They lived in the lower floor of the castle with other knights because there was enough space there. In this essay I will compare the views on women of samurai and knights, the views on education of both warriors, and their code of conduct.…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Samurai had leather armour with strips of iron infused into various spots of their uniform. Also…

    • 352 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Intro: Although the big empires, Europe and Japan were really successful feudalist empires and both had some similarities and differences during the 9th to 13th century, which made them unique empires in the world. Both of the empires have a similar concept of elite warriors, different treatment of women during the post-classical era, and a similar political structure of a hereditary caste system, which were the main reasons they became successful empires.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Since Japan had an emperor, feudalism developed because the emperor united the clans. Before feudalism, Japan was inhabited by many different clans. Clans fought each other frequently. Lives were lived in fear of attack. People were unhappy before feudalism and they started fighting for land. Feudalism gave samurai land. Rich landowners gave land for labor and crops. Feudalism is the bond of loyalty between a lord and those to whom he has given land.…

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Japan and Europe during the middle ages had both been affected by agriculture, social classes, and lack of power from the king/emperor. However, there had been major differences such as the role of women, and the different beliefs for a warrior between Chivalry (knights) and the Bushido code (samurais).…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The societies and political structure during Renaissance Europe, Edo Japan and Aztecs all have their similarities and differences. In Edo Japan and Renaissance Europe, feudalism was the main structure of power; however in Renaissance Europe, a large emphasis was put on trading as well, but in Edo Japan no trade was allowed, as Japan was still in isolation. The Aztecs considered most of their workers as equals, but nobles were given an advantage in education becoming a warrior because they started much earlier in age. This is similar many Renaissance city states where nobles were treated better and were able to get better jobs with less work. In both the Aztec and Japanese culture, warriors (until the Mejia revolution) were highly valued both religiously and militarily. Aztecs and Italian Renaissance citizens both highly valued their gods, but they worshipped them in…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics