Preview

Classical Management Viewpoint of the Worker

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1901 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Classical Management Viewpoint of the Worker
Q11 a The classical management writers had a particular viewpoint of the worker. Discuss what this was. [12 marks]

a The evolution of management has been in existence since the construction of massive structures such as the pyramids in Egypt in the ancient days and the Great Wall of China during the Qing Dynasty period. It is thus evident how important the role of management and its application is globally and through the passage of time. The emergence of the classical approach occurred during the Industrial Revolution in Great Britain and Europe, as it became necessary to have a more formal approach to management. Production shifted away from the cottage industry as large complex organisations sprouted due to new forms of technology. The classical approach places emphasis on purpose, formal structure, hierarchy of management, technical requirements, and common principles of organisation in order to manage efficiently the higher amount of outputs from increased producitivity. (needs emphasis on the workers) The classical management approach comprises of three theories namely- bureacratic management by Max Weber, Scientific management by Taylor and Administrative management by Henri Fayol. Max Weber is a German sociologist who defined an organisation as a well-defined hierarchy of authority and responsibility, following a system of rules and regulations where there is no confusion and conflicts. Under this formal hierarchy structure, workers abide by rules and follow accordingly without question. Official positions exist in their own right and jobholders have no rights to particular positions in the top management, since appointment of staff is based on qualification and competence. This will thus allow for a stable and well-defined job content such that work performance is based on the identified roles. However, the over-emphasis on rules and regulation only serves to dehumanise and demotivate the workers as workers’

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    The classical theory is the earliest form of management that perceived that a set of universal principles would apply to all the organizations in all situations to achieve efficiency and organization's goals. Scientific management and bureaucratic theory were one of the several components of the classical school of organization. Important pioneers among them are Frederick Taylor and Max Weber. The classical theories have been contested of little relevance to work and organization today simply because today’s organizations have moved from industrial revolution to the information age due to the fast-paced change in technology (Toffler, 1984). Although bureaucracy has been synonymous to red tape and has negatives effects such as “rigidity, alienation and low commitment” (Adler, 1999, p.37) and dehumanizing people (Grey, 2009), the characteristics of bureaucracy such as specialization, hierarchy of authority, system of rules and impersonality (Stewart, 1986) as well as evidence of ongoing existence of this management method, bureaucracy is proved to remain noteworthy. This essay will examine the situation presented in organization today, and determine whether bureaucracy and scientific management can be considered as old fashioned, out of date and of little relevance to work and organization today.…

    • 2652 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The classical school of management is thought to of originated around the turn of the current century and dominated management thinking into the 1920 's. It had one main focus and this was on the efficiency of work processes, either through bureaucratic management that focuses on rules and procedures, or scientific management which concentrates on the one best way in which a job can be done. It is now commonly considered by modern theorists that these ways of management are outdated and not completely relevant to organisations in this day and age. This essay will look to examine wether this is actually the case, through the use of personal experiences and case studies of other people and companies. Traditionally these theorists saw employees and their needs or wants as being secondary to the needs of the business, this has been seen as one of the main reasons for these theories to become outdated. However they can still be argued as useful because they introduced the theory of management and provided ideas for the development of future management.…

    • 2174 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Management has been studied by a lot of theorists who then learning from their own experiences came out with different theories and styles of management, explaining how to manage. The classical school has proven to be one of the most influential of all the schools. (Brooks 2009). Due to the success of the bureaucratic and scientific management style of managing, this essay will look into the bureaucratic style of management and then the scientific style of management and show that although these theories were developed during the turn of the twentieth century, they are still present in organisations today and are still very relevant to this day and age.…

    • 1949 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The classical perspective emerged during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, and emphasized a rational, scientific approach to the study of management. The factory system of the 1800’s faced challenges such as tooling plants, organizing managerial structure, training non-English speaking employees (immigrants), scheduling, and resolving strikes. These new problems and the development of large complex organizations demanded a new perspective on coordination and control. The classical perspective contained three subfields, each with a slightly different emphasis – scientific management, bureaucratic organizations and administrative principles.…

    • 2905 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Classical organization theory has been around since the early 1900’s. This theory is associated with scientific management, bureaucratic theory, and administrative theory. A man named Frederick Taylor came up with scientific management theory in 1917 (Walonick, 1993). It was also called “Taylorism”. There are four principles to classical organizational theory. Find the “best way” to do the tasks, match workers to each task very carefully, use awards and punishment systems and supervise employees carefully, and planning and controlling (Walonick, 1993). Max Weber (1947) added on to Taylor’s theory. Weber came up with the bureaucratic theory, which had more “hierarchical structure of power” (Walonick,…

    • 1127 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Classical approach is an approach to the organization that doesn’t account the individual needs of its employees, doesn’t give any financial reward, and no social interaction. It deals with very little communication and focuses more on how division of work and labor. Classical theory approach assumes that the organizational members are the tools of the management and as tools they are part of the organization’s system and is expected to perform accordingly to their function.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Max Webber vs Henri Fayol

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Weber created a formal system of organizations and administration designed to ensure effective and efficient practices called principles of bureaucracy. The principles of bureaucracy are based off five principles that are similar to Henri Fayol’s system of management which is based off fourteen principles. Both state that it is critical to have authority to lead the employees and to hold them accountable for their actions. Max Weber's fourth principle states that “Authority can be exercised effectively in an organization when positions are arranged hierarchically, so employees know whom to report to and who reports to them.”(p.50). this is similar to a principle that Fayol had. Fayol stated in his Line of authority that “The length of the chain of command that extends from the top to the bottom of an organization should be limited” (p.52). If this is known and a chain of command is stated then it can be determined who needs to report to whom with decisions. Both men also showed concern for equity. These two had systems for performance that led to rewards. Between motivation and leadership, many similar themes are possible. Both analyzed jobs, positions, and individuals. They believed that authority needed to lead employees and hold people accountable for actions.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Weber's theory of bureaucratic management has two essential elements. First, it entails structuring an organization into a hierarchy. Secondly, the organization and its members are governed by clearly defined rational-legal decision-making rules. Each element helps an organization to achieve its goals.…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bureaucratic organisations are based upon rules and hierarchy of the structure where poor employee motivation, inertia are common. According to Max Weber, bureaucratic structures are the most efficient models. The structure is centralised with well-defined line of authority with clear rules and regulations. Only one way flow of decision making and communication is followed by the leaders. Only formal relations are present based on positions and not on personalities.…

    • 1764 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    From their creation, organizations will develop, adapt and evolve and so will the theories and models. Modern organizational theory is rooted in concepts developed during the Industrial Revolution. During that period was the research of Max Weber, a German sociologist. Weber based his model bureaucracy on legal and absolute authority, logic, and order. Weber believed that bureaucracies, staffed by bureaucrats, represented the ideal organizational form. In the bureaucracy, responsibilities for workers are clearly defined and behavior is controlled by rules, policies, and procedures. One can suggest that Weber’s bureaucracy mimicked a machine, people were arranged to perform specific functions, each of which worked in concert with another to form a streamlined process. This is similar to the…

    • 1699 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The ability and means by which an organisation is run, requires for strong managerial expertise and leadership. The ability to realistically plan, organise resources effectively and efficiently, co-ordinate and control resources in this every changing, complex, dynamic environment is at the forefront of quality managerial practices. Good management has demonstrated itself more important than ever, with the peak Global Financial crisis in 2008/2009 proving that the historical theory’s and innovations in managerial practices are absolutely paramount to thriving economic prosperity. It is through the functions, approaches included in the literature of Henri Fayol’s 1949 English translated General and Industrial Management, Henry Mintzberg’s studies into managerial roles and German sociologist and economist Max Weber’s concept of bureaucracy that acknowledge and promote guidelines, expectations and accountability from managers. The extent, to which modern day management upholds and applies all three of these historical studies/ theories into modern management practices will be basis for coherent, strong, fully functioning and ultimately successful leadership. Although contextually theses theorists devised their work at different times in history, the underlying concepts are universal and valid. These theories foundations are undoubtedly necessary and are clearly applicable to contemporary modern day management.…

    • 2284 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first is represented by scientific management or the classical school of management theory. The scientific management approach strove to control people and keep down their costs. It emphasised the need for rationality, clear objectives, the right of managers to manage and adopted work study and similar methods. These led to the reduction of tasks to their basic elements and the grouping of similar elements together to produce low-skilled, low-paid jobs, epitomised by assembly line working with a large measure of interchangeability between workers. Workers tended to be treated relatively impersonally and collectively (management and labour) and the nature of the psychological contract was calculative, with a focus on extrinsic rewards and incentives. Such a strategy encouraged a collective response from workers, hence the development of trade unions. While this strategy epitomised the management approach of the first half of the 20th century, it has left its legacy in many management practices, such as organisation and method study, job analysis and description, selection methods, an overriding concern for efficiency and the bottom line, appraisal and performance management.…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Prior to the industrial revolution, majority of the people worked on farms. These farms were mainly family operated and the jobs were seasonal and very repetitive. Here no major management strategies were required. There were however, large infrastructural projects going ahead from almost the dawn of time. The pharaohs of Ancient Egypt used managerial strategies to build the pyramids, the Romans also had their strategies for building their empire but in this essay I will talk about the modern managerial theory’s from the 19th century onwards.…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Classical Management Theory was introduced in the late 19th century during the Industrial Revolution. The Industrial Revolution was a time when innovation really began to change the way products were produced and sold. The invention of machines to produce goods in the 19th century drastically improved productivity and in turn lowered consumer cost. The lower price resulted in the greater demand for products and thus a greater need for more factories and workers. At the time, managers were interested in finding ways to to improve productivity, lower cost, increase quality of their products, improve employee/manager relationships, and increase efficiency. The main concern for Classical Management Theorist was to find the best possible way for workers to perform and manage their task. Classical Management Theory is comprised of three separate branches: Scientific Management, Bureaucratic Management, and Administrative Management.…

    • 4561 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Management and Weber

    • 1708 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Max Weber was a German sociologist in the twentieth century; he was famous for his classical management theory. Weber classified three different types of authority, traditional, charismatic and legitimate authority. Traditional authority is based on traditions and customs that the leader has the legitimate right to use authority. Charismatic authority is the belief that the leader whose mission and visions will inspire others. Legitimate authority is based on formal, system of rules. In the 1930s, Weber introduced that the bureaucratic form as being the ideal way of organizing government agencies. This soon became popular in both the private and public sectors. Weber believes that the development of rational forms to be the most important characteristics in the development of Western society and capitalism. He considered the traditional and charismatic forms as irrational. Rationality is based on reasoning, calculation and logic. One of the many types of rationality includes the formal rationality. The notion of formal rationality is important to the emergence of industrial capitalism as capitalism values reason, calculation and precision, science and logic. Formal rationality is a form of rationality that characterizes bureaucratic organizations. Bureaucracy refers to the execution of tasks that are governed by official administrative and formal rules of an organization. Weber’s bureaucratic management theory focuses on dividing organizations into hierarchies with authorities and control.…

    • 1708 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays