Preview

Theoretical Management and Its Modern Day Applicability

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2284 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Theoretical Management and Its Modern Day Applicability
The ability and means by which an organisation is run, requires for strong managerial expertise and leadership. The ability to realistically plan, organise resources effectively and efficiently, co-ordinate and control resources in this every changing, complex, dynamic environment is at the forefront of quality managerial practices. Good management has demonstrated itself more important than ever, with the peak Global Financial crisis in 2008/2009 proving that the historical theory’s and innovations in managerial practices are absolutely paramount to thriving economic prosperity. It is through the functions, approaches included in the literature of Henri Fayol’s 1949 English translated General and Industrial Management, Henry Mintzberg’s studies into managerial roles and German sociologist and economist Max Weber’s concept of bureaucracy that acknowledge and promote guidelines, expectations and accountability from managers. The extent, to which modern day management upholds and applies all three of these historical studies/ theories into modern management practices will be basis for coherent, strong, fully functioning and ultimately successful leadership. Although contextually theses theorists devised their work at different times in history, the underlying concepts are universal and valid. These theories foundations are undoubtedly necessary and are clearly applicable to contemporary modern day management.
As noted by modern day academia (Schermerhorn et al 2011, p.103):
“In this new and very challenging environment.., no one should sell history short. Knowledge gained through past experience can and should be used as a foundation for future success”.
The management theories of Fayol, Mintzberg and Weber are still relevant and important to modern day managers, as they are a basis for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Theories of Management

    • 2350 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Leadership refers to one’s ability to effectively influence subordinates to achieve the goals of their organization. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the foundations, methods and thought processes that define the main theories and how leaders use the key model components to achieve desired outcomes. This paper will thoroughly describe these theories in detail and list numerous advantages and disadvantages of each. Though seemingly dissimilar on the surface, each leadership theory presented in this paper share the objective of obtaining the goals of the organization, and when combined these theories can lead to the highest quality leadership. The theories that will be discussed in this paper are: “Great Man” theory, trait theory, contingency theory, situation theory, behavioral theory, participative theory, management theory, and relationship theory.…

    • 2350 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The idea and process behind the field of Management has been around for as long as man can remember, with the earliest of our prescribed theorists being Henri Fayol whose birth date dates back as far as 1841. This may seem like a long time ago however if we simply look at the concepts that these early theorists contributed then we would be able to quickly notice that these same ideas are still in play in the modern age. Throughout this assignment I have chosen to delve into the minds of Elton Mayo and Frederick Herzberg, I have chosen these two as they simply stood out to me as characters who share common thought processes in a sense while still managing to tackle their goals in different ways. Many see this pair as a duo who share too many…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Fayol and Mintzberg

    • 1915 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the era of modernisation these days, it appears that the purpose of managers in every single organisation is becoming so essential that we are required to understand the real concept behind management as well as the actual tasks performed by a manager. An understanding of the nature of management is vital for all members of society because all of us will at home stage to be a manager, and an understanding of the concept will enable us to become more effective in that role (Bartol, Martin, Tein & Matthews, 1995, p.13). Throughout the development of management, there are classical theory of management and modern management theory. As categorized by a French industrialist, Henry Fayol, the classic management portrays 4 functions known as POLC: Planning, Organizing, Leading, and Controlling. However, in the late 1960’s, Henry Mintzberg undertook a careful study of 5 executives to determine what these managers did on their jobs. In Mintzberg’s framework, a manager consists of 3 roles: informational roles, interpersonal roles, and decisional roles. Throughout this essay, the structure will be first about discussion of Fayol and Mintzberg theories in management, then, their comparison and contrast relating functional and process approaches in describing managerial tasks and ultimately the assumption section The objective of this essay is to identify and provide evidences of the similarities and differences between Fayol and Mintzberg ideas that expectantly may help the reader to enrich his/her knowledge in advance.…

    • 1915 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Management Theories

    • 4932 Words
    • 20 Pages

    Basic management models and theories associated with motivation and leadership and be able to apply them to practical situations and problems…

    • 4932 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chandler: The Enduring Logic of Industrial Success Main claim: Successful companies exploit economies of scale and scope in capital-intensive industries by investing in: • Production capacity: technology, research & development • Strong management hierarchies • National and international marketing and distribution networks Secondary claims: • The first companies to make these investments dominate their market and are First Movers; they have the upper hand on the Experience Curve and thus a competitive advantage, and they maintain their position through constant innovation and strategy. • Growth through unrelated diversification is a poor business strategy; the right idea is moving into related product markets or to expand geographically • Companies in an oligopoly become stronger through intense competition. • Companies grow horizontally by combining with competitors, and vertically by moving backward to control materials and forward to control outlets. Greiner: Evolution and Revolution as Organizations Grow Main claim: Organizational growth is characterized by five successive developmental phases, each with a management focus and style, and each followed by a predictable crisis; management practices that work in one phase are unsuitable for the next and precipitate the crisis. Secondary claims: • Organizations should not skip phases; some go quickly through them, some regress • Top managers whose style is no longer appropriate should remove themselves • Growth is avoidable • The future of an organization is determined predominantly by its history (behavior is determined more by past events/experiences than by what lies ahead) Phases of evolution (CDDCC): • Creativity: informal, long hours, market feedback • Direction: hierarchy, specialization, formal communication, managers, supervisors • Delegation: decentralized organizational structure, empowering of lower-level managers • Coordination: formal planning, top executives initiate and administrate new systems •…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Someone once said that if we use a pistol to shoot the past, the future will use cannon to shoot us. History is a very important aspect of society. People strongly believe that they can learn a vast number of significant lessons from the past, because these lessons will give them the motivation towards success and teach them how to avoid a lot of mistakes.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whereas Fayol’s management theories were attained through experience in the management discipline, Mintzberg’s management theories on the contrary were attained through research as an academician. Tripathi, Tripathi & Reddy (2008) argue that the two authors have differing views on management but, not competing. In short, they both have contributed valuable theories in management. Additionally, Wook Yoo, Lemak & Choi, (2006) posit that Mintzberg’s work in this discipline was to elaborate and reaffirm Fayol’s managerial concepts. However, not all authors agree to the fact that Fayol and Mintzberg’s work were complementary. Indeed, Golden Pryor & Taneja (2010) holds a different view by stating that Mintzberg’s work was very critical of Fayol’s work often disregarding Fayol’s concepts on management as ‘folklore’ in comparison to findings by Mintzberg attained through systemic research. This is a clear indication of the differing opinions various authors have on Fayol’s…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Classical Management Theory

    • 2633 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Assignment 1: Essay 4 April 2012 Question 1 -­‐ Classical Management Theory and Leadership Communication Communication is a channel that we use everyday to convey ideas, thoughts and exchange information. Communication consists three elements: sender, receiver and message.…

    • 2633 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fayol and Mintzberg

    • 892 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The aim of this project is to highlight what management is all about. Management is a vague term which many theorists have different interpretation. It has become an important part of our society and also in our daily activities. Based on my research, management is the process of getting activities completed efficiently and effectively with and through people. In this essay, I will be comparing and contrasting the views of management with two profound theorists, Fayol and Mintzberg. But before I do so I would like to give you a historical background on these theorists and also the approach each theorist takes to describe on their theory. However, these two theorists are like two sides of a coin. The objective of this essay is to show the similarities and differences between Fayol’s and Mintzberg’s views of management in order to enrich the reader’s knowledge in advance.…

    • 892 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The organised use of labour or Management as we now call it, is as old as time. However it was only in the 19th century that management and the idea of management thought emerged as an important element of political, economic and social development. I believe that historical perspectives have been critically important to the development of management thought through the centuries. Management ideas have been developed out of social and cultural circumstances, over time the social and cultural circumstances have radically changed and developed but the principle of management and management thought has been slow in keeping up with these developments.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henri Fayol (1841-1925) is the major contributor to this theory. He was a French coal-mining firm’s managing director, and also “classified as members of the classical school of management, which tried to develop rational techniques and single best approaches to managing organizations.” (Gale Group, Inc., 2000, p.88) In Administration Industrielle et Generale, a classic 1916 book, he presented five elements or functions of management, they are planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating and controlling. He supposed all managers should include these five functions. Also, he presented fourteen “general principles of management”…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is fortunately for this generation manager because they have more than century's management theory and thought to retrospect. Although modern management theory dates primarily from the early twentieth century, there was serious thinking and theorizing about managing many years before. Throughout many different contributions of writers and practitioners have resulted different approaches to management, resulting in a kind of management theory jungle and help them to face the challenge of the future.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Management Theories

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Unity of direction. One boss and one plan for a group of activities having the same objective.…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The management process in any organization is not like an event, it involves a series of ongoing activities that include planning, organizing, staffing, directing and controlling.…

    • 2611 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Management Theory

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Learning objectives for Group 1: After studying this topic you should be able to do the following:…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics