Preview

• What Is Moral Relativism?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
609 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
• What Is Moral Relativism?
What is moral relativism? Relativism is the position that all perspectives are similarly legitimate and the individual figures out what is valid and relative for them. Relativism hypothesizes that fact is distinctive for various individuals, not just that diverse individuals accept diverse things to be valid. While there are relativists in science and arithmetic, moral relativism is the most well-known assortment of relativism. Nearly everybody has heard a relativist trademark:

What's ideal for you may not be what's appropriate for me.

What's ideal for my way of life won't really be what's appropriate for your way of life.

No ethical standards are valid for all individuals constantly and in all spots.

Moral relativism speaks to the position that there are no ethical absolutes, no ethical set in stone. This position would attest that our ethics develop and change with social standards over some stretch of time. This rationality enables individuals to transform morally as the way of life, information, and innovation change in the public eye. Subjugation is a decent case of moral relativism. Over and over the estimation of an individual is dictated by a blend of social inclinations and examples, experience, feelings, and "guidelines" that appeared to achieve the most advantage. …show more content…
Subjective moral relativism underpins the view that reality of good standards is with respect to people. Whatever you accept is appropriate for you by and by is totally up to you to decide. Subjective relativism enables you to be sovereign over the rules that manage how you carry on with your
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cultural Relativism In Lewis Vaughn's Argument
    • 202 Words
    • 1 Page

    Cultural Relativism In Lewis Vaughn's Argument

    Cultural Relativism is defined in Lewis Vaughn’s “Beginning Ethic: an Introduction to Moral Philosophy” as the view that an action is correct morally if the culture deems it so (pg. 30). This differs from Objectivism, which believes that some moral truths “are valid for everyone” or universal (pg. 29). All cultures have different views on what is right and wrong from a moral standpoint. The beliefs in one place are different in other place because both cultures have different heritages. This does not make the other cultures moral views any less correct than that of you own. Therefore, the concept of cultural relativism true. Supporters of the objectivism would say that having universal truths would prevent, in their view, action deemed morally…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Examples Of Ethical Relativism
    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page

    Examples Of Ethical Relativism

    Many people are lead to adopt Ethical Relativism because they believe that it justifies their view that one ought to be tolerant of the different behavior of people in other cultures. However, Ethical Relativism does not really justify tolerance at all. All around the world, there are different types of cultures, which have different ethical values that will be correct according to their cultures. Nevertheless, some people might argue about different cultures that have different moral codes that they can not accept; examples: polygamy and infanticide. On the other hand, Ethical Relativism proposes that we can stop the criticism and be more tolerant with other cultures. To illustrate, we could no longer say that custom of other societies…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    ETHICAL (MORAL) RELATIVISM
    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages

    ETHICAL (MORAL) RELATIVISM

    Presently, Americans are comfortable relating ethics to individuality. Often times, American citizens expresses their right of freedoms to enhance their own sense of ethics or relativity. In defining relativism, moral principles are a matter of personal feelings and individual preference. As for individual moral relativism, figuring out what is moral and immoral in specific circumstances differs according to the person. On another note, moral relativists have a disbelief in universal truths or common law.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Moral Relativism In Trying Out One's New Chores
    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Moral Relativism In Trying Out One's New Chores

    Moral relativism is one’s perception of what is acknowledged to be morally just or unjust depending on accepted demeanor. Certain behaviors and manners that a specific culture may consider to be acceptable, another culture may consider to be unethical. In such an instance, neither one of the cultures would be incorrect. Morals are culturally defined in that it originates from the root as to what is considered socially acceptable.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Lenn Goodman Analysis
    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Lenn Goodman Analysis

    ARE THERE UNIVERSAL MORAL REQUIREMENTS AND IS SOME MORALS UNIVERSALLY KNOWN AS WRONG? CHALLENGES TO RELATIVISM…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Evaluate 
Rachel's 
Arguments 
Against 
Cultural
 Relativism
    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Evaluate 
Rachel's 
Arguments 
Against 
Cultural
 Relativism

    Cultural relativism, as defined by the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. “Is the thesis that a person’s culture strongly influences her modes of perception and thought” Most cultural relativists add to this definition saying that there is no standard of morality. This means that morality is relative to the particular society that one lives in. Prominent ethicist James Rachels has written against this view in his work titled The Challenge of Cultural Relativism. This paper will be focused on evaluating Rachels’ critique of cultural relativism, and whether it was right for him to endorse objective moral realism. Rachels defines this as “a standard that might be reasonably used in thinking about any social practice whatever. We may ask whether the practice promotes or hinders the welfare of people whose lives are affected by it.” That is the moral worth of an action is based upon how it contributes to the society from which it operates in.…

    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Annotated Bibliography
    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Annotated Bibliography

    Moral Relativism is what determines whether the action or conduct is right or wrong. This article states how from a moral absolutist standpoint, some things are always right, while some things are always wrong no matter how much one tries to rationalize them. At the same time, this article defines moral relativism as the belief that conflicting moral beliefs are true. What this means is that what you think is morally right, may not be morally right for someone else. Basically relativism replaces the search for absolute truth. Moral relativism and moral absolutism are means of deriving the morality of the character from The Road. They are tools to use to judge the characters actions, if they can be considered morally correct or morally unethical.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Shaw: Morality and Ethical Relativism
    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Shaw: Morality and Ethical Relativism

    Ethical relativism is a concept in which most simple minded individuals adhere to. According to definition in the chapter, ethical relativism is the normative theory that what is right is what the culture or individual says is right. Shaw argues that it is not very plausible to say that ethical relativism is determined by what a person thinks is right and wrong. He gives reason that it “collapses the distinction between thinking something is right and it’s actually being right.” Ethical relativism may be justified occasionally. William H. Shaw examines ethical relativism by providing comprehensive examples on why relativism is a weak method in gaining morals.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Moral Relativism Analysis
    • 116 Words
    • 1 Page

    Moral Relativism Analysis

    Moral Relativism is the thought that the moral beliefs held by individuals is influenced and dependent on the culture in which they live in considers tolerable. Hence, what is considered morally appropriate in a single society perhaps is perceived as immoral in a different society. In actuality they both maybe right as they have distinct creators resulting in different laws, diversity, and possibly religious views of each other. Ruth Benedict defends the theory of moral relativism in her article A Defense of Moral Relativism from The Journal of General Psychology. In contrast, William B. Irvine author of Confronting Relativism feels in a few swift examples people can be talked out of their views on moral…

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Example Of Moral Relativism
    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Example Of Moral Relativism

    Moral relativism did not become a prominent topic in philosophy or elsewhere until the 20th century. Moral relativism is the making of an excuse for the action done. Behaviors should not be dismissed under certain circumstances. Moral relativism is dangerous and illogical which can be seen through murders, abortion, and lying.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Theories Of Ethical Relativism
    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Theories Of Ethical Relativism

    Relativism is the idea that one's beliefs and values are understood in terms of one's society, culture, or even one's own individual values. You may disagree with someone and believe your view is superior, relative to you as an individual; more often, relativism is described in terms of the values of the community in which one lives. The view of ethical relativism regards values as determined by one's own ethical standards, often those provided by one's own culture and background. Rather than insisting that there are moral absolutes, moral claims must be interpreted in terms of how they reflect a person's viewpoint; moral claims are then said to be "right in a given culture" or "wrong for a given society." Perhaps one person lives in a culture where having a sexual relationship outside of marriage is regarded as one of the worst things a person can do; in this culture a person engaging in extramarital sex may be punished or even forced to leave. But another culture might have a considerably different…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    ‘Relativist theories give no convincing reason why people should be good.’
    • 808 Words
    • 3 Pages

    ‘Relativist theories give no convincing reason why people should be good.’

    Relativism gives us a greater understanding of other cultures as it explains the discrepancies in moral codes. Herodotus, a Greek historian recounted when the King of Persia offered both the Greeks and the Callatians money if they adapted to each other’s funeral practices (the Greeks burnt the bodies of their fathers, while the Callatians ate the bodies of their fathers). However both disagreed and would not swap for any amount. What was right for one tribe was wrong for the other. What is right or wrong depends upon the nature of the society; different cultures create different values. We all live with unique cultures and so have our own idea of ‘good’.…

    • 808 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Moral Relativism And The Korowai Tribe From New Guinea
    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Moral Relativism And The Korowai Tribe From New Guinea

    What is the concept of relativist morality: Moral relativism is an opposing perspective from the objective ways of a moral absolutist such as Plato , whose moral standards are fixed regardless of the context. The whole concept of absolutism is universal and deontological; therefore it is unchanging. Whereas Moral relativism is teleological: the outcome of the action is not taken into consideration, meaning that moral relativism possesses moral truth that is dependent on place, culture, time and religion. Furthermore it is subjective in a way that our overall conclusion of an ethical situation is based on what we feel is the most suitable moral judgement. Relativism indicates that there is no one true morality, there should not be one solution…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Cultural Relativism Essay
    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Cultural Relativism Essay

    This premise of cultural relativism shows prefigure of moral relativism. Moral relativism can be generally grouped into three categories; (1) descriptive moral relativism, (2) normative moral relativism, and (3) meta-ethical moral relativism. Descriptive relativism, according to Frankena, is the idea ‘that the basic ethical beliefs of different people and societies are different and even conflicting’ [1973:109]. The second form of ethical relativism conceives the idea that ‘what is really right or good in the one case is not so in another. Such a normative principle seems to violate the requirements of consistency and universalization’[1973:109]. The last among the three reveals that ‘there is no objectively valid, rational way of justifying one against another; consequently, two conflicting basic…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Has Moral Relativism Changed History
    • 198 Words
    • 1 Page

    How Has Moral Relativism Changed History

    Moral Relativism changed history by giving people a different perspective to different things in life. A moral Relativist would say that there is no right and wrong and that you have no authority to judge that person based on their beliefs or actions, they also believe that one should be accepting of others. Moral relativism has been influencing the way people think and act for many years. From ancient greece to modern day moral relativism is in all aspects and fields including Science, Philosophy, and Religion. These days, we don't really know what to believe, if it's what we heard or read.…

    • 198 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More