Cultural Relativism Essay

This premise of cultural relativism shows prefigure of moral relativism. Moral relativism can be generally grouped into three categories; (1) descriptive moral relativism, (2) normative moral relativism, and (3) meta-ethical moral relativism. Descriptive relativism, according to Frankena, is the idea ‘that the basic ethical beliefs of different people and societies are different and even conflicting’ [1973:109]. The second form of ethical relativism conceives the idea that ‘what is really right or good in the one case is not so in another. Such a normative principle seems to violate the requirements of consistency and universalization’[1973:109]. The last among the three reveals that ‘there is no objectively valid, rational way of justifying one against another; consequently, two conflicting basic
Conversely, anyone who enrolled in the USA’s institution from Bangladesh must give up her gestures, and follow the US student gestures. Hence, moral relativism based on this presumption that one ought to abide by the ethical norms of the culture where one is located [2012:539]. But, if anyone does not follow the culture where she resides, then it is certainly wrong. On the other hand; moral universalism, in response to the former question, might claim that certainly it is not the case. It is the opposite view of meta-ethical moral relativism that holds the view that moral principles, values, duties and virtues are valid and universally applicable. Students of Bangladesh are showing their respect to teacher by doing this. Hence, it is a way of expressing respect to the teachers. In the USA, students are obeying the regulations set up by the teachers of the concerned courses. It implies that though both of the students are doing the different things, their objectives are indifferent, that is to show the respect to the