Preview

What Is Louis Pojman Ethical Relativism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
398 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is Louis Pojman Ethical Relativism
Louis Pojman stands for objectivism instead of relativism in morality. Ethical relativism is “the theory that there are no universally valid moral principles”. Ethical relativism however is different from moral doubt where valid moral principles do not exist at all. Pojman argues that what is considered as morally right or wrong varies from society to society. Pojman proposes that ethical relativism can be seen as a good thing but can get hard when getting into the details. Ethical relativism is defined that says moral principles are dependent on the society or individual’s choice. Pojman uses how “morally based leaders” who fought against injustices might be wrong. Pojman talks about the concept of diversity thesis which is
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Assess Rachels Critique Of The Main Argument For Normative Cultural Relativism
    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Assess Rachels Critique Of The Main Argument For Normative Cultural Relativism

    In this essay, I will discuss James Rachels’ article “The Challenge of Cultural Relativism”, in which he criticizes the normative cultural relativism argument which is about how different cultures have different moral codes, thus there is no single truth to define “truth” or a correct set of moral codes because the idea of right or wrong varies within cultures. Firstly I am going to explain what the cultural relativism argument is about and then present my assessment of Rachels’ critique regarding this argument from careful…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Shaw: Morality and Ethical Relativism
    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Shaw: Morality and Ethical Relativism

    Ethical relativism is a concept in which most simple minded individuals adhere to. According to definition in the chapter, ethical relativism is the normative theory that what is right is what the culture or individual says is right. Shaw argues that it is not very plausible to say that ethical relativism is determined by what a person thinks is right and wrong. He gives reason that it “collapses the distinction between thinking something is right and it’s actually being right.” Ethical relativism may be justified occasionally. William H. Shaw examines ethical relativism by providing comprehensive examples on why relativism is a weak method in gaining morals.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Marin Shkreli Vs. Gibbs
    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Marin Shkreli Vs. Gibbs

    Ethical relativism says there is no defined right and wrong. This right and wrong is learned from a person’s culture. For example, Shrkeli could have grown up with a father that defrauded customers or stole from investors in his company. Gibbs could have had a grandfather that communicated to him from a young age that he should work to get back at those that hurt him or the people he loves. What might be wrong in Gibb’s culture, might be right in Shrkeli’s, and vice versa.…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Complications Of The Tribe In Northwest Melanesia
    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Complications Of The Tribe In Northwest Melanesia

    A moral relativist is someone who views that ethical standard, morality, and positions of right or wrong are culturally based and therefore subject to a person’s individual choice. In regards to Pojman beliefs, I do agree that most American students tend to be moral relativists. It is because of the culture that we grew up in. Morality depends on the amount of social acceptance it gets to morally good or bad. For example, he stated that individuals said they were relativists contended in the same polls that abortion is only right if the mother is in danger or that the capital punishment is wrong, but this is not always the case. Given certain circumstance, many individuals will do what he/she feels is morally right. If a mother to be feels the need to abort an unborn child so her life can be easier, she will do so. The attraction of relativism depends on, if an individual feels what they are doing in a certain situation is worth the…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Lenn Goodman Analysis
    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Lenn Goodman Analysis

    ARE THERE UNIVERSAL MORAL REQUIREMENTS AND IS SOME MORALS UNIVERSALLY KNOWN AS WRONG? CHALLENGES TO RELATIVISM…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Examples Of Ethical Relativism
    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page

    Examples Of Ethical Relativism

    Many people are lead to adopt Ethical Relativism because they believe that it justifies their view that one ought to be tolerant of the different behavior of people in other cultures. However, Ethical Relativism does not really justify tolerance at all. All around the world, there are different types of cultures, which have different ethical values that will be correct according to their cultures. Nevertheless, some people might argue about different cultures that have different moral codes that they can not accept; examples: polygamy and infanticide. On the other hand, Ethical Relativism proposes that we can stop the criticism and be more tolerant with other cultures. To illustrate, we could no longer say that custom of other societies…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Moral Relativism In Trying Out One's New Chores
    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Moral Relativism In Trying Out One's New Chores

    Moral relativism is one’s perception of what is acknowledged to be morally just or unjust depending on accepted demeanor. Certain behaviors and manners that a specific culture may consider to be acceptable, another culture may consider to be unethical. In such an instance, neither one of the cultures would be incorrect. Morals are culturally defined in that it originates from the root as to what is considered socially acceptable.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Evaluate 
Rachel's 
Arguments 
Against 
Cultural
 Relativism
    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Evaluate 
Rachel's 
Arguments 
Against 
Cultural
 Relativism

    Cultural relativism, as defined by the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. “Is the thesis that a person’s culture strongly influences her modes of perception and thought” Most cultural relativists add to this definition saying that there is no standard of morality. This means that morality is relative to the particular society that one lives in. Prominent ethicist James Rachels has written against this view in his work titled The Challenge of Cultural Relativism. This paper will be focused on evaluating Rachels’ critique of cultural relativism, and whether it was right for him to endorse objective moral realism. Rachels defines this as “a standard that might be reasonably used in thinking about any social practice whatever. We may ask whether the practice promotes or hinders the welfare of people whose lives are affected by it.” That is the moral worth of an action is based upon how it contributes to the society from which it operates in.…

    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pojman Ethical Relativism
    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pojman Ethical Relativism

    Ethical Relativism is the belief that nothing is objectively right or wrong and that the meaning of what is right and wrong depends on the individual and culture. Pojman breaks down Ethical Relativism into 2 main concepts: The Diversity Theory and the Dependency Theory. The Diversity Theory addresses the concept of what is morally right and wrong varies from society to society; therefore, there is no universal moral principles that all societies accept. For example, Homosexuality in the Middle East is a forbidden practice, while in ancient Greek culture, it was said to be a accepted practice. The Dependency Theory says that all moral principles receive their validity from cultural acceptance.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Annotated Bibliography
    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Annotated Bibliography

    Moral Relativism is what determines whether the action or conduct is right or wrong. This article states how from a moral absolutist standpoint, some things are always right, while some things are always wrong no matter how much one tries to rationalize them. At the same time, this article defines moral relativism as the belief that conflicting moral beliefs are true. What this means is that what you think is morally right, may not be morally right for someone else. Basically relativism replaces the search for absolute truth. Moral relativism and moral absolutism are means of deriving the morality of the character from The Road. They are tools to use to judge the characters actions, if they can be considered morally correct or morally unethical.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Moral Relativism Analysis
    • 116 Words
    • 1 Page

    Moral Relativism Analysis

    Moral Relativism is the thought that the moral beliefs held by individuals is influenced and dependent on the culture in which they live in considers tolerable. Hence, what is considered morally appropriate in a single society perhaps is perceived as immoral in a different society. In actuality they both maybe right as they have distinct creators resulting in different laws, diversity, and possibly religious views of each other. Ruth Benedict defends the theory of moral relativism in her article A Defense of Moral Relativism from The Journal of General Psychology. In contrast, William B. Irvine author of Confronting Relativism feels in a few swift examples people can be talked out of their views on moral…

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Moral Relativism By Osama Bin Laden
    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Moral Relativism By Osama Bin Laden

    This world is the abundant soil in which we plant our roots, but the quality and quantity of our growth often falls upon the virtues instilled by our environment. We exist in a society that blossoms with morals based on politics, geography, religion, and countless other variables. In such a society, it is virtually impossible for an entire world to agree on a set of morals to abide by, and therefore our world is saturated with the ideals of moral relativism, whether or not we see it blatantly. Moral relativism is often given the stigma of sprouting impurity or immorality, given the fact that it does not accept that there is a universal moral codex.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Example Of Moral Relativism
    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Example Of Moral Relativism

    Moral relativism did not become a prominent topic in philosophy or elsewhere until the 20th century. Moral relativism is the making of an excuse for the action done. Behaviors should not be dismissed under certain circumstances. Moral relativism is dangerous and illogical which can be seen through murders, abortion, and lying.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Cultural Relativism Essay
    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Cultural Relativism Essay

    This premise of cultural relativism shows prefigure of moral relativism. Moral relativism can be generally grouped into three categories; (1) descriptive moral relativism, (2) normative moral relativism, and (3) meta-ethical moral relativism. Descriptive relativism, according to Frankena, is the idea ‘that the basic ethical beliefs of different people and societies are different and even conflicting’ [1973:109]. The second form of ethical relativism conceives the idea that ‘what is really right or good in the one case is not so in another. Such a normative principle seems to violate the requirements of consistency and universalization’[1973:109]. The last among the three reveals that ‘there is no objectively valid, rational way of justifying one against another; consequently, two conflicting basic…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Cultural Relativism: The Minimum Conception Of Cultural Values
    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Cultural Relativism: The Minimum Conception Of Cultural Values

    The idea of right and wrong varies from culture to culture. The five tenets of cultural relativism going to depth defining moral codes. Complications and moral questions arise when one culture begins harming another—Nazi genocide, war, imperialism, etc. Geographic boundaries blur in our technologically advanced, globalized world. The most daunting logical challenge presented by cultural relativism is it hinders a society from judging the codes or values of another society and even our own (Lecture 1).…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics