Preview

Moral Relativism And The Korowai Tribe From New Guinea

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
930 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Moral Relativism And The Korowai Tribe From New Guinea
What is the concept of relativist morality:

Moral relativism is an opposing perspective from the objective ways of a moral absolutist such as Plato , whose moral standards are fixed regardless of the context. The whole concept of absolutism is universal and deontological; therefore it is unchanging. Whereas Moral relativism is teleological: the outcome of the action is not taken into consideration, meaning that moral relativism possesses moral truth that is dependent on place, culture, time and religion. Furthermore it is subjective in a way that our overall conclusion of an ethical situation is based on what we feel is the most suitable moral judgement. Relativism indicates that there is no one true morality, there should not be one solution
…show more content…
The Korowai Tribe from New Guinea permits cannibalism in their culture as a ritual to protect the tribe from the Khakhua (a demon), and this is considered a cultural norm among the tribe. Cultural relativism emphasises that cultures should be respected of their rights and should be viewed upon with a neutral perspective. Conventionalism applies strongly to cultural relativism as it is important that we follow the moral code of our society, because that is how we were brought up to …show more content…
Relativism does not completely follow after moral rules, the rules are altered in a way which is flexible in contrast to an absolutist’s rules. For example the Decalogue states: ‘You shall not murder’ In terms of the euthanasia, this goes against an absolutist’s moral rules however, when it comes to a relativist’s perceptive they are able to adapt to certain situations. The situation is significantly different when it comes to murdering for the sake of committing crime and relieving a loved one from pain and suffering by intentional death. The morality of these situations are significantly different as well as the intentions behind

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Shaw gives an obvious and unconvincing example. He compares abortion in two different societies; it is absolutely wrong in Catholic Spain, but widely accepted in Japan. Most readers would agree that this occurs and abortion is a topic that the world will most likely never come to agreeing terms with. Therefore, relativism is actually significant in each culture. Cultural relativism is complicated in that a whole group of people within an area believe in what they've always been told. Shaw gives an excellent example about slavery in the south. Decades ago, it unfortunately existed and it was acceptable in that time period. However, now it is clearly immoral. A relativist would think that it is acceptable because it was part of the culture. It is not steady to keep changing morals through time. So, who distinguishes right from wrong in that whole society in the first place?…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A moral relativist is someone who views that ethical standard, morality, and positions of right or wrong are culturally based and therefore subject to a person’s individual choice. In regards to Pojman beliefs, I do agree that most American students tend to be moral relativists. It is because of the culture that we grew up in. Morality depends on the amount of social acceptance it gets to morally good or bad. For example, he stated that individuals said they were relativists contended in the same polls that abortion is only right if the mother is in danger or that the capital punishment is wrong, but this is not always the case. Given certain circumstance, many individuals will do what he/she feels is morally right. If a mother to be feels the need to abort an unborn child so her life can be easier, she will do so. The attraction of relativism depends on, if an individual feels what they are doing in a certain situation is worth the…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many people are lead to adopt Ethical Relativism because they believe that it justifies their view that one ought to be tolerant of the different behavior of people in other cultures. However, Ethical Relativism does not really justify tolerance at all. All around the world, there are different types of cultures, which have different ethical values that will be correct according to their cultures. Nevertheless, some people might argue about different cultures that have different moral codes that they can not accept; examples: polygamy and infanticide. On the other hand, Ethical Relativism proposes that we can stop the criticism and be more tolerant with other cultures. To illustrate, we could no longer say that custom of other societies…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Moral relativism is one’s perception of what is acknowledged to be morally just or unjust depending on accepted demeanor. Certain behaviors and manners that a specific culture may consider to be acceptable, another culture may consider to be unethical. In such an instance, neither one of the cultures would be incorrect. Morals are culturally defined in that it originates from the root as to what is considered socially acceptable.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pojman Ethical Relativism

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ethical Relativism leads to absurd consequences because it is asking us to turn a blind eye as to what is going between another culture. Ethical Relativism believes that one culture should be tolerant of another culture's different morality choices, because the mass majority of that society believes it was morally right. Pojman brings up, that if this concept is true, then that means that the most heinous crimes such as the Holocaust, is morally right, because the majority of the Germany society believe it was the right thing to do. If we were to follow the beliefs of Ethical Relativism, that would mean that during the Holocaust,we would have no right to step forward. But Podjman was not the only one to oppose against Ethical Relativism.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Annotated Bibliography

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Moral Relativism is what determines whether the action or conduct is right or wrong. This article states how from a moral absolutist standpoint, some things are always right, while some things are always wrong no matter how much one tries to rationalize them. At the same time, this article defines moral relativism as the belief that conflicting moral beliefs are true. What this means is that what you think is morally right, may not be morally right for someone else. Basically relativism replaces the search for absolute truth. Moral relativism and moral absolutism are means of deriving the morality of the character from The Road. They are tools to use to judge the characters actions, if they can be considered morally correct or morally unethical.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moral Relativism is the thought that the moral beliefs held by individuals is influenced and dependent on the culture in which they live in considers tolerable. Hence, what is considered morally appropriate in a single society perhaps is perceived as immoral in a different society. In actuality they both maybe right as they have distinct creators resulting in different laws, diversity, and possibly religious views of each other. Ruth Benedict defends the theory of moral relativism in her article A Defense of Moral Relativism from The Journal of General Psychology. In contrast, William B. Irvine author of Confronting Relativism feels in a few swift examples people can be talked out of their views on moral…

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The justification of murdering is one major act in moral relativism in that it is illogical. An example is in a murder case somebody says they killed the person because they needed to be killed. This is illogical in that we have no right to say who is to die or not. In the commandments it states thou shall not steal. The topic goes against this commandment because you are going against God's law. Another type of murdering…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethical relativism is based on society and also individual’s desires. With that being said ethical relativism varies from culture to culture and person to person. Does this mean that ethical relativism is any less of a valid theory than other theories? We shall find out in the next 3 pages. Joseph Ratzinger once said “having a clear faith based on the creed of the church is often labeled today as fundamentalism. Whereas relativism, which is letting oneself, be tossed and swept along by every wind of teaching, look like the only attitude acceptable and today’s standards (www.brainyquote.com).…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is Relativism Unfair

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages

    If for example a relativist lived in a society that refuses to punish an individual that kills a child, then they are entitled to not like this as it is their opinion but but they are not obliged to judge the abusers actions as unjust. It is apparent that killing a child is unjust and wrong but yet a relativist has no right to declare the murderer as guilty of wrongdoing, this rise a question ‘If we are certain that murder of a child is wrong, then how can relativism exists?’ How can it be fair to not be able to label something seen as cruel , as unjust and thus wrong how can it be possible to not see this as unjust? And how is this fair on the victim? That their death was in fact not wrong and not unjust because the actions were committed subject to the perpetrator’s moral understanding of what is right and good or because their society claims that this is right and…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moral Minima

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The article was very clear and left no room for grey areas but as history would show, and as it’s stated in the first chapter, “the view of ethical relativism regards values as determined by one’s own ethical standard, often those provided by one’s own culture and background. Rather than insisting that there are moral absolutes, moral claims must be interpreted in terms of how they reflect a person’s viewpoint; moral claims are then said to be “right in a given culture” or “wrong for a given society”. (Mosser, 2010)…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cultural Relativism Essay

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This premise of cultural relativism shows prefigure of moral relativism. Moral relativism can be generally grouped into three categories; (1) descriptive moral relativism, (2) normative moral relativism, and (3) meta-ethical moral relativism. Descriptive relativism, according to Frankena, is the idea ‘that the basic ethical beliefs of different people and societies are different and even conflicting’ [1973:109]. The second form of ethical relativism conceives the idea that ‘what is really right or good in the one case is not so in another. Such a normative principle seems to violate the requirements of consistency and universalization’[1973:109]. The last among the three reveals that ‘there is no objectively valid, rational way of justifying one against another; consequently, two conflicting basic…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Instead absolutism neglects different circumstances along with cultural attitudes, cannot have a clear idea of its morals as no one can state them or knows them, also it is not concerned with the motive or outcome of any actions. However, it does provide a universal vision to measure everything against, creating fairness as everyone would get the same punishment or reward, providing us with a UN Declaration of Human Rights, also in certain circumstances people instinctively have an absolutist attitude; for example cruelty to babies is wrong. On the other hand relativist judgments are always subjective, decreasing the fairness as people might have different losses or benefits because of their actions, people will also disagree on each other’s judgments. This view also stops social development; an example of this would be genocide which should be considered wrong but from a relativist vision it would be analysed depending on circumstances and goals, the holocaust would be an example of this. It is also more complicated to apply than absolutism as there would not be a fixed…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Therefore, atrocities could be committed with no consequences or moral justice. “The conscientious moral agent is someone impartially with the interests of everyone affected by what he or she does; who carefully sifts facts and examines their implications…” (Rachels 14). Cultural relativism challenges reason and impartiality because its tenets are logically inconsistent. It benefits more people to condemn or questions the values behind certain acts committed, such as genocide, stoning, gang rape, and…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cultural Relativism is the idea that moral practices and social norms change from culture to culture, and so morality and ethics are relative and are determined by our culture. The idea is that if moral practices and social norms vary from culture to culture…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays