Preview

Example Of Moral Relativism

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
286 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Example Of Moral Relativism
Moral relativism did not become a prominent topic in philosophy or elsewhere until the 20th century. Moral relativism is the making of an excuse for the action done. Behaviors should not be dismissed under certain circumstances. Moral relativism is dangerous and illogical which can be seen through murders, abortion, and lying.
The justification of murdering is one major act in moral relativism in that it is illogical. An example is in a murder case somebody says they killed the person because they needed to be killed. This is illogical in that we have no right to say who is to die or not. In the commandments it states thou shall not steal. The topic goes against this commandment because you are going against God's law. Another type of murdering
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Shaw: Morality and Ethical Relativism
    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Shaw: Morality and Ethical Relativism

    Ethical relativism is a concept in which most simple minded individuals adhere to. According to definition in the chapter, ethical relativism is the normative theory that what is right is what the culture or individual says is right. Shaw argues that it is not very plausible to say that ethical relativism is determined by what a person thinks is right and wrong. He gives reason that it “collapses the distinction between thinking something is right and it’s actually being right.” Ethical relativism may be justified occasionally. William H. Shaw examines ethical relativism by providing comprehensive examples on why relativism is a weak method in gaining morals.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Complications Of The Tribe In Northwest Melanesia
    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Complications Of The Tribe In Northwest Melanesia

    A moral relativist is someone who views that ethical standard, morality, and positions of right or wrong are culturally based and therefore subject to a person’s individual choice. In regards to Pojman beliefs, I do agree that most American students tend to be moral relativists. It is because of the culture that we grew up in. Morality depends on the amount of social acceptance it gets to morally good or bad. For example, he stated that individuals said they were relativists contended in the same polls that abortion is only right if the mother is in danger or that the capital punishment is wrong, but this is not always the case. Given certain circumstance, many individuals will do what he/she feels is morally right. If a mother to be feels the need to abort an unborn child so her life can be easier, she will do so. The attraction of relativism depends on, if an individual feels what they are doing in a certain situation is worth the…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Lenn Goodman Analysis
    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Lenn Goodman Analysis

    ARE THERE UNIVERSAL MORAL REQUIREMENTS AND IS SOME MORALS UNIVESRALLY KNOWN AS WRONG? CHALLENGES TO RELATIVISM…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Is Louis Pojman Ethical Relativism
    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What Is Louis Pojman Ethical Relativism

    Louis Pojman stands for objectivism instead of relativism in morality. Ethical relativism is “the theory that there are no universally valid moral principles”. Ethical relativism however is different from moral doubt where valid moral principles do not exist at all. Pojman argues that what is considered as morally right or wrong varies from society to society. Pojman proposes that ethical relativism can be seen as a good thing but can get hard when getting into the details.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Examples Of Ethical Relativism
    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page

    Examples Of Ethical Relativism

    Many people are lead to adopt Ethical Relativism because they believe that it justifies their view that one ought to be tolerant of the different behavior of people in other cultures. However, Ethical Relativism does not really justify tolerance at all. All around the world, there are different types of cultures, which have different ethical values that will be correct according to their cultures. Nevertheless, some people might argue about different cultures that have different moral codes that they can not accept; examples: polygamy and infanticide. On the other hand, Ethical Relativism proposes that we can stop the criticism and be more tolerant with other cultures. To illustrate, we could no longer say that custom of other societies…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Moral Relativism In Trying Out One's New Chores
    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Moral Relativism In Trying Out One's New Chores

    Moral relativism is one’s perception of what is acknowledged to be morally just or unjust depending on accepted demeanor. Certain behaviors and manners that a specific culture may consider to be acceptable, another culture may consider to be unethical. In such an instance, neither one of the cultures would be incorrect. Morals are culturally defined in that it originates from the root as to what is considered socially acceptable.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Moral Relativism And The Korowai Tribe From New Guinea
    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Moral Relativism And The Korowai Tribe From New Guinea

    What is the concept of relativist morality: Moral relativism is an opposing perspective from the objective ways of a moral absolutist such as Plato , whose moral standards are fixed regardless of the context. The whole concept of absolutism is universal and deontological; therefore it is unchanging. Whereas Moral relativism is teleological: the outcome of the action is not taken into consideration, meaning that moral relativism possesses moral truth that is dependent on place, culture, time and religion. Furthermore it is subjective in a way that our overall conclusion of an ethical situation is based on what we feel is the most suitable moral judgement. Relativism indicates that there is no one true morality, there should not be one solution…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Annotated Bibliography
    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Annotated Bibliography

    Moral Relativism is what determines whether the action or conduct is right or wrong. This article states how from a moral absolutist standpoint, some things are always right, while some things are always wrong no matter how much one tries to rationalize them. At the same time, this article defines moral relativism as the belief that conflicting moral beliefs are true. What this means is that what you think is morally right, may not be morally right for someone else. Basically relativism replaces the search for absolute truth. Moral relativism and moral absolutism are means of deriving the morality of the character from The Road. They are tools to use to judge the characters actions, if they can be considered morally correct or morally unethical.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Moral Relativism Analysis
    • 116 Words
    • 1 Page

    Moral Relativism Analysis

    Moral Relativism is the thought that the moral beliefs held by individuals is influenced and dependent on the culture in which they live in considers tolerable. Hence, what is considered morally appropriate in a single society perhaps is perceived as immoral in a different society. In actuality they both maybe right as they have distinct creators resulting in different laws, diversity, and possibly religious views of each other. Ruth Benedict defends the theory of moral relativism in her article A Defense of Moral Relativism from The Journal of General Psychology. In contrast, William B. Irvine author of Confronting Relativism feels in a few swift examples people can be talked out of their views on moral…

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Moral Relativism By Osama Bin Laden
    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Moral Relativism By Osama Bin Laden

    As the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy states, the “most serious objection to moral relativism…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Has Moral Relativism Changed History
    • 198 Words
    • 1 Page

    How Has Moral Relativism Changed History

    Moral Relativism changed history by giving people a different perspective to different things in life. A moral Relativist would say that there is no right and wrong and that you have no authority to judge that person based on their beliefs or actions, they also believe that one should be accepting of others. Moral relativism has been influencing the way people think and act for many years. From ancient greece to modern day moral relativism is in all aspects and fields including Science, Philosophy, and Religion. These days, we don't really know what to believe, if it's what we heard or read.…

    • 198 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Is Relativism Unfair
    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Is Relativism Unfair

    If for example a relativist lived in a society that refuses to punish an individual that kills a child, then they are entitled to not like this as it is their opinion but but they are not obliged to judge the abusers actions as unjust. It is apparent that killing a child is unjust and wrong but yet a relativist has no right to declare the murderer as guilty of wrongdoing, this rise a question ‘If we are certain that murder of a child is wrong, then how can relativism exists?’ How can it be fair to not be able to label something seen as cruel , as unjust and thus wrong how can it be possible to not see this as unjust? And how is this fair on the victim? That their death was in fact not wrong and not unjust because the actions were committed subject to the perpetrator’s moral understanding of what is right and good or because their society claims that this is right and…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Relativism and Morality Lenn Goodman
    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Relativism and Morality Lenn Goodman

    Lenn Goodman offers a very good argument about his idea of the things that are wrong. I agree with his argument that four of the things that we should look to in whatever being we worship are “(1) genocide, politically induced famine, and germ warfare; (2) terrorism, hostage taking, and child warriors; (3) slavery, polygamy, and incest; and (4) rape and female genital cutting.” (Goodman, Project Muse, pg 88)…

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Moral Minima
    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Moral Minima

    The article was very clear and left no room for grey areas but as history would show, and as it’s stated in the first chapter, “the view of ethical relativism regards values as determined by one’s own ethical standard, often those provided by one’s own culture and background. Rather than insisting that there are moral absolutes, moral claims must be interpreted in terms of how they reflect a person’s viewpoint; moral claims are then said to be “right in a given culture” or “wrong for a given society”. (Mosser, 2010)…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    To Walk Away or Not to Walk Away from Omelas
    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages

    To Walk Away or Not to Walk Away from Omelas

    Ethical Relativists believe that each culture’s morality is moral within itself; each culture has its own moral codes that are true within that culture. If a number of people have create a society with moral codes that uphold the society and thus enable the society to exist and function, there fore the moral codes of that society are indeed moral within that culture or culture. An ethical relativist would not walk away from Omelas, because he or she would believe that the citizens of Olemas are being perfectly moral when inflicting horrible pain and suffering upon the child to uphold the town’s utopia, because they follow their moral code, which was established within their culture.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More