CASE ANALYSIS: GOOGLE Submitted to: Antonio Errol Ybanez‚ Jr.‚ DBA CSEE Submitted by: Oliver A. Javier TABLE OF CONTENTS • COMPANY BACKGROUND • TOWS MATRIX • MICHAEL PORTER’S COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS • BOSTON CONSULTING GROUP • THE COMPETITIVE PROFILE MATRIX Company Background Google Inc. is a multinational
Premium Google Web search engine
Health Group LLC.‚ and Google are working to solve this issue. In 2008‚ Google launched an application called Google Health‚ a free application that stores user’s medical records using a standard format. When users start a profile with Google‚ they input all of their information which creates a “health profile‚” which can be available to doctors and physicians to view and even change after a visit‚ thus eliminating the paper record. But when users start using a company like Google Health to store their
Premium Medicine Physician Health care
References 5 1. Introduction Google inc. is a company specialized in internet services and products‚ Google is developing over the last 14 years to become one of the best operating firms worldwide and obviously it did. Google has arranged many benefits to its employees in order to motivate and energize them. Google has café with free diverse food‚ a fitness center and laundry room in its campus‚ all of that can meet with employees physiological needs. Google has free on-site physicians and nurses
Premium Motivation Maslow's hierarchy of needs Google
Google has many challenges in motivating their current employees. In an industry that is extremely competitive and always changing‚ Google has found themselves losing employees to competitors (like Facebook) and smaller startup companies. Google offers their employees many perks and benefits that most people that work for large companies think are quite lavish. From offering massages‚ on-site laundry‚ and spa treatments (just to name a few)‚ Google has to keep their talented employees happy of
Premium Google search Web search engine Google
three companies and three very different managing styles. The articles look at how three very important people keep a handle on their employees. Steve Jobs co-founder of Apple and his non-text book approach to an autocratic managing style‚ CEO of Google Eric Schmit and his laissez-faire catastrophe and Ricardo Semler CEO of SEMCO and his participative ways that surprisingly seem to be working. All run in different markets and have created their own rules to follow. They are the companies paving the
Premium Google Steve Jobs Ricardo Semler
information‚ it is obvious how much the Recession affected the powerful company. Google’s stocks suffered during the recession in 2008 at $307.65 a share but they managed to pull it back up to $619.98 a year later by introducing the all new web browser‚ Google Chrome‚ and their first smartphone called the G1 for T-Mobile. Their stock grew a little in value over the past three years and was at $707.38 on December 31st of 2012. * Google’s revenue was actually not affected by the recession and continued
Premium Windows Mobile Android Smartphone
Running head: KEEPING GOOGLE “GOOGLEY” Keeping Google “Googley” Kim Scott joined the Google team as the director of the Google product AdSense in 2004. Google was a company that started in 2004 with 3‚000 employees and by 2008 boasted 17‚000 employees. The company prided itself in hiring employees that fit the ‘Google personality’‚ meaning they would be part of an innovative‚ open corporate culture. Google didn’t want to be known for strict corporate
Premium Google World Wide Web Internet
SWOT analysis of Google This is a Google Inc. SWOT analysis for 2013. For more information on how to do SWOT analysis please refer to our article. Company background Google Inc. is a multinational corporation that provides Internet-related products and services‚ including internet search‚ cloud computing‚ software and advertising technologies. Name Industries served Geographic areas served Headquarters Current CEO Revenue Profit Employees Main Competitors Google Inc. Internet Worldwide U.S.
Premium Google Web search engine World Wide Web
FACEBOOK VS GOOGLE+ Social Networking has become a part of the everyday movement in many lives. There are many social networking sites out there today; you have Twitter which is for blogging‚ Linked in which is used by Professionals‚ Facebook the largest social networking today‚ and Google+ the new competition for Facebook. Google+ opened on July 31st‚ 2011 and by August 24th‚ 2011 they reached 54 Million users. Facebook and Google+ have a lot of similarities but also a lot of dissimilarities
Premium Social network service Facebook
36 No. 1‚ pp. 85-90. Fast Company & Inc. (2013). THE WORLD ’S MOST INNOVATIVE COMPANIES. Retrieved 18 DEC 2013 from http://www.fastcompany.com/703052/worlds-most-innovative-companies Google. (2010). Google: Global Diversity and Talent Inclusion 2010 annual report. Retrieved 20 DEC 2013 from http://static.googleusercontent.com/media/www.google.co.uk/en/uk/diversity/Google-2010-Report-on-Global-Diversity-and-Inclusion.pdf Google. (2013). Corporate: culture. Retrieved 18 DEC 2013 from http://www
Premium Human resource management Human resources 1922