Intimacy between the Executive and the Legislature: Under this system there is a close relationship between the Executive and the legislature. The members of the Executive‚ i.e.‚ the Prime Minister and his cabinet colleagues are also the members of the legislature. They in fact enjoy the support of the majority in the legislature. Thus the Prime Minister and his cabinet can pass‚ amend or repeal any type of law with the support of subservient majority in the legislature. In this way‚ the executive and
Premium Presidential system Prime minister President of the United States
senators and forty-two assembly members. The legislature is the branch most directly receptive to the voice of the people of the state and consists of initiative‚ referendum‚ and recall. Initiative is the right to put laws into effect and propose constitutional amendments. The legislature also gives the people of the state a chance to enact‚ amend‚ or repeal laws through referendum and initiative (Erickson. 2010). Many people consider Nevada’s state legislature the most important branch in the constitution
Premium United States Constitution United States Congress United States
PROVINCIAL LEGISLATORS AT UNISA on 18 November 2011 GOVERNANCE AND LEADERSHIP PROGRAMME DRAFT COMMUNICATIONS PLAN Background An awards ceremony will be held on 18 November 2011 in Pretoria for 158 Members of Parliament and Provincial Legislatures who have completed the Governance and Leadership Programme. The programme is offered under the auspices of the University of South Africa (UNISA). A total of 293 MPs and MPLs registered for the programme initially but some could not complete their
Premium
appoint‚ in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct‚ a Number of Electors‚ equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress…” Having state legislatures “appoint” the Electors who select the chief executive would minimize the president’s capacity to lead on the basis of his popular support. In a very real sense‚ the president would not be accountable to the people but rather to the state legislatures who appoint Electors. This procedure
Premium President of the United States President Separation of powers
theory has faced a large amount of criticism from academics on a number of accounts. Firstly‚ many scholars have taken issue with the argument that Sections 33 and 1 of the Charter facilitate dialogue. In theory Section 33 does provide a way for legislatures to force through legislation that would otherwise be struck down due to being in violation of certain sections of the Charter‚ but in reality‚ Section 33 has rarely been evoked (Cameron‚ 2004‚ 148). The political fallout associated with a government
Premium Law Democracy Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
(Art. I‚ Sec. 2). Contrast this with the original constitutional language for the other house of Congress‚ “The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State‚ chosen by the Legislature thereof for six Years…” (Art. I‚ Sec. 3). The phrase “chosen by the Legislature” was changed to “elected by the people” by the 17th Amendment‚ but not until 1912. In other words‚ from the beginning the House of Representatives was intended to be exactly what its name suggests –representative
Premium United States United States House of Representatives United States Constitution
forms of government have their own distinctive characteristics‚ and their own respective merits and demerits. A parliamentary system is a system of government in which the ministers of the executive branch get their democratic legitimacy from the legislature and are accountable to that body‚ such that the executive and legislative branches are intertwined. In such a system‚ the head of government acts as de facto chief executive and chief legislator. Parliamentary systems have no clear-cut separation
Premium Presidential system Parliamentary system Head of state
derives its legitimacy from and are accountable to the legislature (the parliament); the executive and legislative branches are thus interconnected. * In a parliamentary system‚ the head of state is normally a different person from the head of government. This is in contrast to a presidential system‚ where the head of state also serves as head of government and where the executive branch doesn’t derive its legitimacy from the legislature. Advantage of Parliamentary System * Selection of
Premium Presidential system Prime minister Parliamentary system
strict schedule can as well the change the chief executive. In addition‚ presidential systems supports the concept “separation of survival”. In other words‚ one cannot remove the other from power. The president cannot dismiss any members of the legislature or vice versa till the end of both their terms. On the other hand‚ in the parliamentary structure the prime minister serves indefinitely as long as he/she hold the confidence of the parliament. The parliament can hold a “vote of no confidence” which
Premium Presidential system Head of state Parliamentary system
exucutives and other government officials is more important. We can also conclude that the legislatures are losing power to the executives. This is partly due to the lack of expertise and turnover in parliaments‚ as well as some structural disadvantages and the fact that reelection has become the main goal of almost all legislators‚ which limits their ability to be independent and proactive. I think that legislatures have to find a way to bring more excitement to their work and losen the party discipline
Premium Democracy United States Government