Preview

Parliamentary and Presidential Forms of Government

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
567 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Parliamentary and Presidential Forms of Government
The White House, home of the president of the United States.
Egyptian Courts Suspend Parliamentary Elections * *
Parliamentary System
1. Intimacy between the Executive and the Legislature:
Under this system there is a close relationship between the Executive and the legislature. The members of the Executive, i.e., the Prime Minister and his cabinet colleagues are also the members of the legislature. They in fact enjoy the support of the majority in the legislature.
Thus the Prime Minister and his cabinet can pass, amend or repeal any type of law with the support of subservient majority in the legislature. In this way, the executive and the legislative branches of the Government work in close harmony. The Executive not only runs the administration but also makes law.
2. Responsibility to the legislature:
In this system, the executive is responsible and accountable to the legislature for all its acts of omission and commission. The legislature can remove a cabinet by passing a vote of no-confidence against it whenever it so desires.
Moreover, the legislature exercises its control over the executive through interpellation, adjournment motions so on and so forth.
3. Gap between Practice and Theory:
In a Parliamentary System, there is always a gap between law and fact. According to law, all powers of the Government are vested in the Chief Executive head who may be President as in India or Governor General as in Canada or King or Queen as in U.K. In actual fact all his powers are exercised by the Cabinet which is created out of the majority party in the legislature.
The Chief Executive head is just an ornamental head or figure head. All real and effective authority is exercised by the Cabinet.
The parliament gov is elected by the legislature.
Presidential System
1. Separation between the Executive and the Legislature:
The executive and the legislative branches of the government under the system are separate and independent of each

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    There is a system of checks and balances where the three branches can check one another. The legislative branch can check on the executive branch by vetoing a bill by a two-thirds vote in the Senate and the House of Representatives and it has the power over federal officers. The legislative branch also has to…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The executive is made up of the Prime Minister (PM) acting in place on the monarch and a group of ministers known as the PMs Cabinet. All cabinet members (including the PM) are members’ of the Privy Council and must also be members of the Commons or the Lord’s, by convention most being from the Commons. Therefore the executive is borne out of the legislature and directly accountable to it. The executive has many functions, such as the power of patronage which is vested in the PM, the setting of the agenda for government and the prioritising of legislation. The close union between the executive and the legislature is prima facie, a potential for abuse as liberal democratic theory calls for a separation between powers.…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Canada regulation

    • 5450 Words
    • 22 Pages

    The direct participation of the royal and viceroyal figures in areas of governance is limited; in practice, their use of the executive powers is directed by the Cabinet, a committee of ministers of the Crown responsible to the elected House of Commons and chosen and headed by the Prime Minister of Canada (presently Stephen Harper), the head of government, though the governor general or monarch may in certain crisis situations exercise their power without ministerial advice.…

    • 5450 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Parliamentary: The executive branch is made up of the prime minister or premier, and that official’s cabinet.…

    • 257 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Three Branches

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The job of the legislative branch is to make the laws. It has checks over the other two branches. To check the Executive Branch, the Legislative Branch can remove the president through…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The legislative branch has the power to check over the executive branch by holding impeachment powers, override a presidential veto to pass a law, and “approve foreign treaties”.…

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    ways when comparisons are drawn from two similarly strong western liberal democratic systems. They both enjoy the same fundamental principles of liberal democracy, with those living under this system enjoying the same rights and freedoms with comparable economic conditions. The real difference between these two systems lies in the division of power (). Parliamentarism has been defined as having the parliament as the only democratically legitimate institution is parliament, whereby the government’s authority is completely dependent upon parliamentary confidence. (). While argues that there are three conditions necessary to declare a system parliamentary: All major government decisions must be taken by people chosen in elections conducted along party lines. Policy must be decided within governing party (parties if coalition). The highest officials (ministers) must be selected within their parties and be responsible to the people through their parties. On the other hand, in presidential systems according to , an executive with considerable constitutional powers - generally including full control of the composition of the cabinet and administration - is directly for a fixed term. The president is also the symbolic Head of State.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Because Cabinet Ministers are members of the legislature as well, so Ministers that are part of the executive can also allocate it some of its powers, such as the passing of the law by the legislature. The executive can over-rule some powers held by the legislature by passing new laws to that effect. Ministers must sit in Parliament. They have a requirement for ministers who are established the joining between executive and legislative that’s why there is not separation between the two.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Checks and Balances

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Constitution grants all legislative power to the Congress. The Congress is bicameral and a bill has to pass both houses: the House of Representatives and the Senate. In this way the houses check and balance each other. Furthermore, both the executive and the judicial branch check and balance the Congress' legislative power. Although only the Congress can make laws, the President has the power to veto bills, in which case the bill can only pass with a 2/3 majority in both houses. Finally, if the Congress and the President agree on a law, the Supreme Court has the power of interpreting the laws and a power of review, i.e. the Supreme Court can declare a law unconstitutional and therefore void.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The legislative determines the laws and may assign judicial, or magistrates, to exercise it. The executive is responsible for enforcing the laws and conducting foreign affairs. There should be a system of checks and balances between the two branches, to avoid despotism and illegitimate governments. Since a monarchy puts the power of both branches into one person, Locke believed all monarchies to be illegitimate forms of government. By advocating some form of representative or democratic government, society can insure that there representatives are working in their best interests. Despotism occurs when either of the two branches of government exceed their authority and begin acting against the benefit of the people. Civil society can then remove the offenders from office through their electoral process or agree to set up a new form of government. When the people are denied these means to choose their government, violent revolution may be the…

    • 1753 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Political systems

    • 7882 Words
    • 32 Pages

    Hard to say who wins, if there is a conflict between the president and the parliament, because they have the same legitimacy. Army decides many times. That’s why this system isn’t good for new democratic states.…

    • 7882 Words
    • 32 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The nature of parliamentary rule governments depends, to a vast degree, on the responsibility of the official. Researchers place the light on the parliament's part in making and breaking governments, concentrating on the arrangement and disintegration of governments, the allotment of cabinet portfolios, and cabinet term. In contrast with the presidential system, the official is not specifically chosen but rather normally rises or is drawn from the chosen parliament and, not at all like a straightforwardly chosen president. This type of parliamentary official normally comprises of an executive and a board of ministers. The cabinet or assembly is the executive official body. Generally the pioneers of the biggest party in the assembly, or the governing inside it, take the official offices (executive). Not at all like presidents, who are the main authorities with general obligations regarding government undertakings, parliamentary officials should share duties with the members. This implies that the cabinet, with the prime minister, is together in charge of the considerable number of activities of the legislature, and the head administrator, subsequently, is just first among equals. Truth be told, prime ministers in numerous nations have obtained more power than this. The principle components of a parliamentary system, along these lines, are: a straightforwardly chosen administrative body, a mix of executive…

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PESTLE Analysis of UK

    • 22108 Words
    • 144 Pages

    ensures adequate distribution of power between the executive branch led by the prime minister, the bicameral legislature…

    • 22108 Words
    • 144 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The executive branch is headed by the President, who is elected by a direct vote of the people. The term of office of the President, as well as the Vice-President, is six (6) years. As head of the Executive Department, the President is the Chief Executive. He represents the government as a whole and sees to it that all laws are enforced by the officials and employees of his department. He has control over the executive department, bureaus and offices. This means that he has the authority to assume directly the functions of the executive department, bureau and office or interfere with the discretion of its officials. Corollary to the power of control, the President also has the duty of supervising the enforcement of laws for the maintenance of general peace and public order. Thus, he is granted administrative power over bureaus and offices under his control to enable him to discharge his duties effectively.…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    separation of power

    • 807 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The executive (president) may veto laws. The executive has the power to wage war at the direction of Congress, who make the rules for the military. The executive can makes declarations and promulgates executive orders. The Executive can influence other branches of its agenda with the State of the Union address. The executive has the power to appoint judges and executive department heads and has the power to grant pardons to convicted persons, except in cases of impeachment.…

    • 807 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays