"Epistemological turn by descartes and hume" Essays and Research Papers

Sort By:
Satisfactory Essays
Good Essays
Better Essays
Powerful Essays
Best Essays
Page 5 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Good Essays

    that the topic of Hume and Skepticism best answers questions of Epistemology. Hume’s ideas are much like connecting what we experience to our senses. He says that the contents of the mind are senses and experiences. We receive impressions from our senses such as colour‚ emotions‚ what we feel‚ hate‚ love‚ etc. Our ideas are what we reflect on from our impressions. Ideas are copies of impressions. We can only receive genuine knowledge from our outer senses and inner senses. Hume said that we should

    Premium Philosophy Epistemology Cognition

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes and Plato

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Descartes and Plato Explain both of descartes Arguments for the existence of God Descartes proof of God’s existence comes from his third meditation and is based on three ideas. He argues that innate idea exists within us‚ the fictitious or invented ideas are a result of our own imagination and adventitious ideas result from our experiences in the world. Descartes said‚ the idea of God is innate and cannot be invented. Descartes presents some arguments that lead to his conclusion. The first

    Premium Ontology Existence Metaphysics

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hume Philosophy Paper

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages

    David Hume was an early 18th century philosopher that is best known for covering a variety of theories. He covered that reason alone cannot be a motive to the will‚ moral distinctions are not derived from reason and moral distinctions are direct from the moral sentiments [Treatise of Human Nature‚ 11]. “Reason is‚ and ought only to be the slave of the passions‚ and can never pretend to any other office than to serve and obey them” [T 2.3.3 p. 414] in his work A Treatise of Human Nature. Reason

    Premium Motivation Reason Adam Smith

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes Rationalism

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    associated with rationalism are Descartes‚ Kant‚ and Leibniz. Empiricism believes that some ideas or concepts are independent of experience and that truth must be established by reference to experience alone. Empiricist support the idea of posteriori which means knowledge that comes after experience or dependent on experience. Locke‚ Humes‚ and Berkeley are philosophers

    Premium Empiricism Scientific method Immanuel Kant

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Matrix illustrate the challenge of skepticism about the external world?  Explain‚ discuss‚ and critically evaluate the hallucination argument for complete epistemological skepticism.  Be sure your essay includes a discussion of either Hospers’ or Crumley II’s criticism of complete epistemological skepticism. Is complete epistemological skepticism a logically coherent theory?  Support your answer with a well-reasoned argument free of any major errors of fact‚ fallacy or logical contradiction.

    Premium The Matrix The Matrix Reloaded Logic

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Professor Mandik Analyzation of Hume Miracles In reading the Enquiry‚ we have to consider on how Hume’s position is on human understanding and how knowledge is obtained will provide a distinct relationship. We know that he believes that humans gain this knowledge through our senses. Hume has provided two phrases on knowledge and how they are provided. He had stated that the experience that we gain is known as “Matters of Fact” and “Relations of Ideas”. Hume is telling us that the “matters of

    Premium God Religion Metaphysics

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Humes View on Miracles

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Explain Hume’s views on miracles. Hume believed we establish cause and effect relationships based on our experience of this world which leads us to make predictions about what will happen in similar cases in the future. To Hume a miracle is a transgression of the laws of nature caused by God or by some form of invisible agent. He uses a priori reasoning supporting this with a number of sub-arguments designed to discredit testimonies regarding miracles. He argued that miracles cannot exist

    Premium Logic Scientific method Inductive reasoning

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Student Name Professor Name Course Name Date Contrast of Hume and Descartes Before any clarifications are made‚ differences between Descartes and Hume are made. Renee Descartes began his search for answers in solitude and presented his findings in a manner as if they were the fruits of his meditations. In his book‚ Meditation on First Philosophy‚ Descartes‚ in his path to absolute certainty‚ discarded all his pre-held notion that he had. In this endeavour to find ideas and truths that

    Premium Epistemology Empiricism Mind

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hume Vs Kant

    • 1828 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In this paper I will be contrasting the moral philosophies of David Hume and Immanuel Kant. Although I will be discussing several ideas from each philosopher the main theme of my paper will be dealing with the source of morality. It is my opinion that Hume’s sentiment based‚ empirical method is more practical than the reason based‚ a priori theory of Kant. According to Kant moral law must be known a priori‚ and must be able to be universally applied to all beings. Kant asserts that empirical explanations

    Premium Morality Philosophy Immanuel Kant

    • 1828 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes vs Locke

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Philosophy Essay (Descartes vs. Locke) Socrates once said‚ “As for me‚ all I know is that I know nothing.” Several philosophers contradicted Socrates’ outlook and believed that true knowledge was in fact attainable. This epistemological view however had several stances to it‚ as philosophers held different beliefs in regards to the derivation of true knowledge. Rationalists believed that the mind was the source of true knowledge‚ while in Empiricism‚ true knowledge derived from the senses. Rene

    Premium Epistemology Metaphysics Mind

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 50