ADIDAS GROUP OF COMPANY [pic] [pic] [pic] [pic] [pic] [pic] [pic] [pic] [pic] [pic] [pic] [pic] [pic] Adidas Executive Board is composed of four members who reflect the diversity and internationality of the Group: Herbert Hainer The Chief Executive Officer Glenn Bennett Responsible for Global Operations Robin J. Stalker Responsible for Finance Erich Stamminger Responsible for Global Brands
Premium Adidas
shareholder value (Niezen‚ Weller & Deringer‚ 2007). Nike and Adidas are two global companies try to improve their competitive advantage through strategically managing and utilizing their supply chain. The purpose of this report is to compare and evaluate the supply chain management practices of Nike & Adidas. 2. CORPORATE PROFILE 2.1 Nike Corporate Profile Based in Beaverton‚ Oregon‚ and employing approximately 29‚000 people worldwide‚ Nike Inc. is the world’s leading designer and marketer of
Premium Supply chain management
Supply Chain Management - Nike & Adidas 1. INTRODUCTION Supply management is a complex function that’s critical to business success‚ responsible for delivering efficient costs‚ high quality‚ fast delivery and continuous innovation throughout companies’ entire supply chains. The strategic contribution of supply management is measured not only in savings made‚ but also in increased shareholder value (Niezen‚ Weller & Deringer‚ 2007). Nike and Adidas are two global companies try to improve their
Premium Adidas Supply chain management Management
financialAnnual Financials for Nike Inc. Cl B View Ratios Fiscal year is June-May. All values USD millions. | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 5-year trend | Sales/Revenue | 19.08B | 18.96B | 20.89B | 24.12B | 25.31B | | Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) incl. D&A | 10.91B | 10.61B | 11.47B | 13.62B | 14.28B | | COGS excluding D&A | 10.56B | 10.27B | 11.12B | 13.23B | 14.28B | | Depreciation & Amortization Expense | 346.9M | 337.2M | 351M | 395M | - | | Depreciation | 335M
Premium Revenue Expense Earnings before interest and taxes
PROMOTION! NIKE Nike is the world’s #1 manufacturer and marketer of athletic footwear and apparel. Almost out of the blue‚ the company established itself as one of the world’s most familiar brands during the 1980s and 1990s.and now 2000s. As familiar as a Coke bottle or Big Mac‚ the Nike "swoosh" logo came to symbolize not just sports culture‚ but street culture‚ as the appeal of the star players who endorsed the brand was carried onto city streets. Nike is undisputed leader in sports-oriented
Premium
strategies of two companies from the same industry. The strategies of Nike and Adidas have been compared from the textile industry. Nike and Adidas both specialize in footwear‚ apparel and accessories and their competition is intense as Nike is the market leader and Adidas is the market challenger. The topics in this assignment cover critical incidents of both Nike and Adidas that occurred in the past and the comparison between both their strategies as well their future plans. This assignment shows
Premium Nike, Inc. FIFA World Cup Athletic shoe
by an organization. They are also the relationship between jobs‚ skills and competencies in the organization. On the hand‚ external competitiveness refers to how an organization pays for jobs in relation to its competitors. For example‚ Adidas pays its employees in relation to Nike’s pay to its employees. The organization sets its pay limits with respect to the lower limit pay rate and upper limit pay rate (Hill &Irwin‚ 11). According to Nike code of conduct‚ the organization uses both internal
Premium Employment Management Minimum wage
Reesport‚Reejoy.Always challenge and lead through creativity. | Price Analyzing the prices of Puma and comparing with its competitor prices was discovered‚ that all of them are more or less on the same price levels – medium to high. Although‚ Nike and Adidas products are mostly expensive‚ while Puma is providing products for affordable prices. Today’s Puma is not only sport clothing and equipment‚ but also
Premium Athletic shoe Adidas Reebok
Herbert Hainer‚ CEO Adidas‚ speaks openly and honestly about his efforts to knock Nike off the Top Spot in 2010 by leveraging the firm’s $200 million World Cup sponsorship push to its full advantage. Currently within spitting distance of Nike’s 2007 €11.1 billion revenue‚ Herbert explains how the World Cup equates to big wins for brands like Adidas in terms of sponsorship‚ advertising and exposure. “The World Cup is definitely the biggest event for us‚” he admits‚ adding that football is in the
Premium Adidas FIFA World Cup FIFA
while watching a Coke commercial in comparison to a Nike commercial. The dependent variable for this experiment was the amount of soda drunk by the test group. The dependent variable was supposed to depend on the commercial shown‚ the Coke commercial or either the Nike commercial. This is the independent variable because this variable does not depend on another variable. The experimental group was subjects who drank Coke‚ while watching either the Coke or Nike commercial. No control group was shown
Premium