THE BALANCED SCORECARD 1 Why businesses need a balanced scorecard The balanced scorecard was developed by US academics Robert Kaplan and David Norton in response to the shortcomings of traditional financial measures. Traditional financial measures are one-dimensional. By definition‚ they only look at the financial aspects of a business. Traditional financial measures are historical. They tell us nothing about what may happen to the business in the future. There are many examples of businesses
Premium Balanced scorecard Strategic management Strategy map
strategies discussed are Kaplan and Norton’s “Balanced Scorecard”‚ and Porter’s “Five Forces”. Kaplan and Norton present a model that help businesses investigate and understand their internal resources‚ and how to align high-level goals to objectives. Porter’s model attempts to help businesses identify and understand the external forces that affect strategic management and long-term sustainability. Keywords: Strategic Management‚ Balanced Scorecard‚ Measurement‚ Strategic Planning
Premium Strategic management Management
pp. 147–160 COMMENTARY Transforming the Balanced Scorecard from Performance Measurement to Strategic Management: Part II Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton Robert S. Kaplan is a Professor at Harvard University and David P. Norton is founder and president of the Balanced Scorecard Collaborative in Lincoln‚ Massachusetts. In a previous paper (Kaplan and Norton 2001b)‚ we described the role for strategy maps and Balanced Scorecards to develop performance objectives and measures linked
Premium Balanced scorecard
This work of BUS 475 Week 3 Strategic Plan III Balance Scorecard comprises: Appendix I Balance Scorecard for Ace Gym Resource: Exhibit 7-1 in Ch. 7 of Strategic Management Develop the strategic objectives for your business in the format of a balanced scorecard. The strategic objectives are measures of attaining your vision and mission. As you develop them consider the vision‚ mission‚ and values for your business and the outcomes of your SWOTT analysis. Consider
Premium Strategic management Business terms Balanced scorecard
Module: Supply Chain Management Exercise: Balanced Scorecard Session 4: Supply Chain Performance Management Instructor: Perry Davidson Candidate: Meg (Hongman) Liang Date: Oct 7th‚ 2013 1. State your organization’s supply chain strategy‚ e.g.‚ “to provide customerwith high level of service while contributing to corporate profitability.” The company’s supply chain strategy is “to meet customer needs and advance our technology leadership while creating value for our customers
Premium Supply chain management Customer Customer service
27‚ 2014 Case Study 7-2 An Analysis of‚ “Case Study 7-2: Balanced Scorecards at BIOCO” BIOCO has realized from its use of balanced scorecards that the company has been able to open communication channels‚ where common goals are established throughout the whole company. Employees are able to view the company’s value drivers‚ such as financial performance. The Chief Intelligence Officer (CIO) believed that that balanced scorecards helped employees to not only look at their own departments operations
Premium Management Strategic management Balanced scorecard
The Balanced Scorecard and Performance Measurement Assignment 1. The design of a good performance measurement system must follow a “top down” approach to ensure that key measures are in fact a measure of the strategic goals established by senior management. Performance initiatives should always start at the top because senior management has the power to implement the system and provide the organizations missions and objectives. The top down approach starts with a clear business strategy
Premium Strategic management Management Balanced scorecard
Research In Motion: A Balanced Scorecard Analysis Contents Company Profile 3 Recent Accomplishments 4 Recent Problems 5 Competition and Market Status 6 Implementation of Planning Process 8 RIM’s Perspectives 9 Customer Perspective 10 Financial Perspective 10 Learning and Growth Perspective 11 Internal Process Perspective 12 Balanced Scorecard 13 Kaplan and Norton Alternative Strategy Choice 13 References 15 Attachment 1: Five year stock comparison of RIM‚ Apple‚
Premium Smartphone Marketing Research In Motion
iPhone VS Blackberry Nowadays‚ the mobile phone or the cell phone is one of the objects that people cannot live without. There are many brands and models for consumers to choose and each phone has different uniqueness and benefits. At this moment‚ iPhone and Blackberry seem to be the cell phone brands that are very hot. Even though they are both popular‚ iPhone is different from Blackberry in several ways‚ including appearances‚ functions and problems that will happen between using. Firstly
Premium Personal digital assistant Mobile phone Keyboard
months ago Kevin Michaluk vowed not to cut his hair until BlackBerry 10‚ the smartphone’s long-delayed new operating system‚ was launched. In New York on January 30th Mr Michaluk‚ who runs CrackBerry.com‚ a website devoted to the device‚ submitted himself to the scissors. He had had time to grow a handsome ponytail. Research In Motion (RIM)‚ the Canadian company that makes the BlackBerry‚ also adopted a new style‚ renaming itself: BlackBerry. Why bother? P erhaps because only pedants ever called
Premium Smartphone The Economist Windows Mobile