Preview

“Critically Evaluate the Case for and Against Global Governance.�? Essay Example

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1204 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
“Critically Evaluate the Case for and Against Global Governance.�? Essay Example
1.0 Introduction: Mulley (2008) defines global governance as “government-like activities in the international system”. Over the past eight decades, it has been possible to witness the growth and development of the various institutions and organisations that compose modern global governance. From the creation of the United Nations to the establishment of the European Union, global governance has had a major influence on politics and on our everyday lives. The purpose of this essay is to examine the different aspects of global governance and attempt to critically evaluate arguments for and against its existence. Therefore, this essay begins with the case against global governance by questioning the role of global institutions systematically focusing on some of the major failures of the international system, such as the managing of the world financial crisis of 2008. It then moves on to evaluate whether the current international community is able to face challenges such as “growth of global inequality and global warming” (Jayadev, 2010). Subsequently, the successes of the various bodies of global governance such as the United Nations Social and Economic council and its Millennium development goals and the benefits of the Single European market will be discussed. Moreover, the essay will analyse some current trends, such as the global warming agreement reached recently in Cancun Mexico, “which give cause for cautious optimism” (Mulley, 2008). Ultimately, this essay constructs a balanced analysis of the positive and negative arguments on global governance and will eventually evaluate whether the arguments proposed reach a coherent and plausible conclusion 2.0 Arguments against: After outlining the structure of this paper, this essay will begin by evaluating the arguments against global governance. Firstly, it will analyse the classic argument of the governance dilemma. Boyer et al, (2007) describes the governance dilemma as the “increasing need of more

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Baylis, J., Smith, S. and Owens P. (eds) (2008), Shapcott, R.in The globalization of world politics: An introduction to international…

    • 3976 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, he believes that after the fall of the Soviet Union the profit-driven globalization-from-above arose as the only legitimate path to economic growth. He argues that citizens – and even governments – feel helpless in an economic climate “where the market reign[s] by divine right”2. While this methodology has arguably increased living standards around the world, it has also encouraged those in power to focus almost entirely on the interests of business and finance. In the process, either by choice or necessity they disregard important social concerns such as wealth inequality, falling labor standards, environmental harm and faltering support for free trade. The second factor encouraging “predatory globalization” is that global organizations such as the UN have very narrow missions that are almost purely concerned with the enlargement of the Security Council.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    6. Seaton, J. (2010). Global Understanding. In: Curran J, Seaton, J Power without Responsibility. 7th ed. Oxon: Routledge. p314…

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The polemic surrounding the process of globalization has hitherto been a highly contentious and controversial matter, whilst at the same time achieving a level of fashion in its use. The many debates over globalization and governance have concentrated upon its implications for the nation-state and that globalization is depriving the state of its sovereignty. Furthermore analysts and commentators have linked the growth of global relations to the diminished nation-state, the decline of the nation-state and the retreat of the state. Others have gone further still to debate the ‘crisis of the nation-state’, ‘the obsolescence of the state’ and even the ‘extinction of the state’. What is certain is that the nation-state is evolving and is being reshaped before our eyes. This essay will examine the contention of whether globalization has reinforced or undermined the legitimacy of the nation-state? Globalization entails a concept of deterritorialization and a spread of supraterritoriality particularly with the growth of transnational political organizations such as the UN, the EU and others. Hence what is the future for the nation-state? Will state borders disappear and herald a new global polity and order as we enter into the twenty first century?…

    • 1925 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Us-Mexico Labour Problems

    • 3416 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Caporaso, A James & Madeira, Mary Anne (2012). Globalization, Institutions, and Governance. London: SAGE Publication Inc…

    • 3416 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Morgenthau, Hans J. 1953: Political limitations of the United Nations. In: Lipsky, Georg A. (ed): Law and Politics in the World Community. Essays on Hans Kelsen 's Pure Theory and Related Problems in International Law, Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press, 143-152. Ness, Gayl D./Brechin, Steven R. 1988: Bridging the Gap: International Organizations as Organizations. In: International Organization 42 (2), 245-273. North, Douglass C. 1990: Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge ; New York, Cambridge UP. Olson, Mancur 1968: Die Logik des kollektiven Handelns. Kollektivgüter und die Theorie der Gruppen. Tübingen, Mohr. Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood 1989: World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia, University of South Carolina Press. Peters, Anne 2006: Völkerrecht: Allgemeiner Teil. Zürich et al., Schulthess. Powell, Robert 1994: Anarchy in International Relations Theory: The Neorealist-Neoliberal Debate. In: International Organization 48 (2), 313-44. Putnam, Robert D. 1988: Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games. In: International Organization 42 (3), 427-460. Risse, Thomas 2007: Social Constructivism Meets Globalization. In: Held, David/McGrew, Anthony (eds): Globalization Theory. Approaches and Controversies. Polity Press. Cambridge and Malden, 126-147. Selten, Reinhard 1978: The Chain Store Paradox. In: Theory and Decision 9 (2), 127-159. Selten, Reinhard/Stoecker, Rolf 1986: End Behavior in Finite Prisoner’s Dilemma Supergames. A Learning Theory Approach. In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 7 (1), 4770. Shanks, Cheryl/Jacobson, Harold K./Kaplan, Jeffrey H. 1996: Inertia and Change in the Constellation of International Governmental Organizations, 1981-1992. In: International Organization 50 (4), 593-627. Simmons, Beth A./Martin, Lisa L. 2002: International Organizations and Institutions. In: Carlsnaes, Walter/Risse, Thomas/Simmons, Beth A. (eds.) Handbook of International Relations. Sage: London et al., 192-211. Stein, Arthur A. 1995: Coordination and collaboration: regimes in an anarchic world. In: Krasner, Stephen D. (ed.): International Regimes. Cornell UP: Ithaca and London, 115-140. Strange, Susan 1997: The Retreat of the State. The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy. Cambridge UP. Cambridge, New York and Melbourne. Ulbert, Cornelia 2005: Konstruktivistische Analysen der internationalen Politik. Theoretische Ansätze und methodische Herangehensweisen. In: Ulbert, Cornelia/Weller, Christoph (eds.): Konstruktivistische Analysen der internationalen Politik. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag, 934. Vaubel, Roland 2006: Principal-agent problems in international organizations. In: Review of International Organizations 1 (2), 125-138.…

    • 17660 Words
    • 71 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    President and Congress

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The era of globalization has witnessed the growing influence of a number of unconventional international actors, from non-governmental organizations, to multi-national corporations, to global political movements. Traditional, state-centric definitions of foreign policy as "the policy of a sovereign state in its interaction with other sovereign states is no longer sufficient. Several alternative definitions are more helpful at highlighting aspects of foreign policies.…

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    World order are the activities and relationship between the world states, and other significant non-state global actors, that occur within a legal, political and economic frame work. The need for world order has arisen due to the past historical conflicts, colonialism, greater interdependence between nations, and the increased impact of the activities of nation states upon other nation states. Legal measures such as the UN, as well as non-legal measures such as the media and Non-governmental organisations, show a mixed effectiveness in response to resolving conflict and working towards world order.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    * Examine the key challenges for public sector management in the global south. Illustrate your answer with contrasting country examples.…

    • 2661 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stakeholder Salience

    • 1089 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The article, “New Coalitions for Global Governance: The Changing Dynamics of Multilateralism,” discuss the effects of global governance and the alternative multilateral arrangements set in place to utilizing multi-stakeholder arrangements and establish intergovernmental organizations that focus on change action and flexibility (Forman, & Segaar, 2006). In this case, the globalization of coalition has positively affected stakeholder salience in…

    • 1089 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Now that the Group of Twenty (G20) summit has arisen as the self-proclaimed permanent, premier forum for international economic governance, a lively debate has erupted about its relationship with the old Group of Eight (G8) and the role of both bodies in the years ahead. Many assume or argue that the G8 will and should fade away, fast, and the G20 assume all the broad agenda and functions the former has long had. Far fewer assert openly that that the new and diverse G20 may itself fade away along with the galvanizing economic crisis that gave it birth, leaving the G8 with its inner Group of Seven (G7) finance ministers to continue as the global steering group that counts. Given the durability of international institutions, it is more likely that both, rather than either or neither, will continue for the foreseeable future, in a relationship that could take several forms. The major possibilities are competition, passive mutual coexistence by dividing up the global policy agenda and governance functions, or active cooperation that brings the comparative advantage of each to reap the global governance synergies that await (Kirton 2009). After less than two years of G20 summitry, it is still too soon to conclude with complete confidence which scenario will spring to life. But there is already substantial evidence to suggest that the system is moving toward synergistic cooperation between the two G’s that will strengthen each and both in the medium term. The global demand for governance is pulling the system in that direction and the old G8…

    • 9876 Words
    • 40 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The World Trade Organization (WTO), as a global organization for the supervision and liberalization of trade in goods and services, and a permanent forum for the negotiation of trade agreements and for the settlement of trade disputes, has always played a significant and irreplaceable role in the global governance. As Pascal Lamy defines, the global governance is ‘the system assisting human society to achieve common objectives in a sustainable manner’ (2010:11). According to the theory of Habermas in his book, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, such common objectives are crucial in a public sphere, where “private persons” assembled to discuss matters of “public concern” or “common interest” through a specific kind of discursive interaction to reach the consensus (Nancy Fraser, 1992:58). In this sense, the WTO can be described as a transnational public sphere, with member states with different languages, cultures and rules in a ‘more multilayered and differentiated social space’ (Bohman,1998:210), where more effective communication is required to accomplish its…

    • 1324 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Since the US atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki one of the foremost global concerns has been the peaceful use and control over atomic energy and nuclear power. When the US dropped nuclear bombs on Japan in 1945 approximately 70,000–80,000 people were killed immediately and another 70,000 were injured. These two atomic bombings resulted in calling global attention to the misuse of atomic energy and as a result, denuclearization and non-nuclear proliferation eventually gained importance in world politics. Ultimately we have seen the emergence of the concept of global governance. Since the beginning of the Cold War, “global governance” (GG) has played a major role in world politics and GG is particularly important in the new millennium as the world faces threats to global security, pandemics, and a growing oil crisis. Consequently, new actors have been created to deal with growing global problems, such as transnational organizations, and international government organizations (IGOs). Many of these organizations have proved effective in resolving global matters but on occasion they have failed to do so. Three important international relation theories have helped GG theorists obtain better insight on the term global governance by initiating different approaches towards the subject. These IR theories have conducted distinct analytical methods in managing global problems such as environmental issues, financial crises or global health issues. For the purpose of using nuclear/atomic energy for peaceful causes and non military motives the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) was established in 1957 within the United Nations family. The IAEA has been a significant example of global governance and as of December 2009 it had 151 Member States. The organization was designed to create confidence about peaceful nuclear activities within member nation-states that had already acquired nuclear weapons and to reduce the proliferation of nuclear weapons in non-nuclear…

    • 2227 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bibliography: John Baylis and Steve Smith (editors),”The Globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations”, Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York, 2005, 3rd Edition…

    • 1780 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is the goal of national self-determination (according sovereign statehood to each national community) compatible with ideals of global justice? Draw critically upon a theory (or theories) of justice to explain and give reasons for your answer.…

    • 3050 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays