Preview

Compatibility of National Self Determination with Ideals of Global Justice

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3050 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compatibility of National Self Determination with Ideals of Global Justice
Essay Plan
Is the goal of national self-determination (according sovereign statehood to each national community) compatible with ideals of global justice? Draw critically upon a theory (or theories) of justice to explain and give reasons for your answer.
Introduction
• Justice – the core notion of justice to revolve around the idea that some entity is entitled, as a matter of right rather than charity, to receive the treatment proper to it - BROWN
• National self-determination
• Cosmopolitan character of global justice – ‘world state’ and people as the primary concern, not states.
• Political justice – states existence is what gives the value of justice its application

Paragraph
Justice
LECTURE SLIDE: Justice – What we owe to one another as members of a society or political community, does not give account of everything that is ‘good’
Political justice – concerned with the just exercise of political power within a society
• Assumes some forms of political power are necessary to maintain social order – who should wield it?
• Dahl – A has power over B to the extent that he can get B to do something that B would not otherwise do
• Control power through law, constitution, institutions
Question of rights
Question of duties/responsibilities
Areas of global justice:
• Distributive justice – distribution of social goods and resources
• Political justice – structure and allocation of political power, linked to democracy
• Restorative justice – duties arising from the legacies of historical injustices, historical justice
Who/what should principles of global justice regulate?
• Individuals, states, communities, other actors like corporations?
• Unified global basic structure, global government?
Key challenges to achieving global justice:
• Power
• Pluralism – people cant agree on what is owed
• System of sovereign nation states reinforces and compounds both of these problems
• SWIFT
• Brown – justice = the core notion of justice to revolve around

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Ap Gove Study Guide

    • 20135 Words
    • 81 Pages

    Political Power – the ability of one person to get another person to act in accordance with the first person’s intentions…

    • 20135 Words
    • 81 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Severn Suzuki’s ‘Future Speech’, Suzuki outlines the need for a just, united world. She details that for an active working justice system, the governements of the world need to unite to decide the future of the those to come. In Suzuki’s speech it is evident that justice is a vital concept in continuing to keep the world in order, however is difficult to achieve. By continuing to control a world where poverty is a growing issue, justice will no longer strive to exist. Severn sees the need for justice as a difficult task to achieve. ‘If a child on the street who has nothing, is willing to share, why are we who have everything so greedy?’ Severn Suzuki’s speech is a constant reminder that justice is an ideal figure, however it is difficult to…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nationalism is primarily the belief in bringing the borders of the state in line with the boundaries of the nation, yet within it exist many strands which disagree as to how this ought to be done. Liberal Nationalism champions the idea that nations are sovereign entities, entitled to liberty, and also possessing rights, most importantly the right of self-determination. Therefore Liberalism does not condone forms of foreign dominion, and hence condemns expansionism through violence, and so may be described as maintaining peace. Furthermore, Liberal Nationalists believe that the ideal world would be constructed of independent, sovereign nation-states. They also believe that these nation-states are equal, like the individuals within them, and that each will be entitled to self-determinism and as all these nation-states are equal and no chauvinism exists, it cannot be stated that Liberal Nationalists would advocate expansionism due to a global hierarchy, as Expansionist Nationalism does.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “World order” is the term given to the balance of power among the nation states of the world. Differences between these nations can lead to a power imbalance, which affects world order. It can best be achieved through agreements between states and other international instruments that set out the ideal international standards of behavior for states on a number of issues. But conflicts arise between countries due to differences in cultural attitudes and the desire for extra territory. In order to settle such disputes the international community has legal bodies such as the United Nations to cooperate with countries to find solutions and be a leader in settling and spreading ethical standards. Their prime aim is to promote world order. But for society not only the autonomy of nations and the lack of enforcement power but also a range of other factors limit the effectiveness of such an organisations.…

    • 2842 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although nationalism once played a very progressive role, yet in hands of industrial powers of the world it has done greater harm than good. An atmosphere of nervous hostility rules the world which resembles nothing so much as a cigarette that is thrown onto the grass and may explode with a single spark. World public opinion is getting against it, because it is based on emotions which are very dangerous when dealing with modern civilization. The world has begun to realize the urgent need of replacing international anarchy by international order. If mankind is to save itself from the catastrophe which awaits it, then humanity should replace national exclusiveness by international inclusiveness. The concept of internationalism is coming into our minds. People should now stop thinking themselves as Indians or Americans. They should think in terms of the whole human race. Time has come when the people are to make a choice between international co-operation, and disaster caused by nation­alism. We must now adjust our nationalism to a perspective of international brotherhood. Internationalism stands for a family of self- governing nations linked to each other by bonds of good will, co­operation and assistance. As ideal internationalism is certainly nobler than nationalism because the good of humanity is far higher than the welfare of a particular country or a community, different parts of the world have been brought so close to one another that we do not feel apart and it appears as if we belonged to one great common group. To bring about international peace and order, different nations must discard mutual hatred and jealousy. It will be in the interest of the human race to create a common international authority of one form or another; and that we should embrace internationalism for the good of separate countries, and for the good of the world, as one.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Globalization has had a dual effect on the sovereignty of the nation-state. Since 1945, the normative framework of human rights has embedded a sense of obligation on the part of the state toward its citizens. The social contract now has a strong welfare element to it. Yet, simultaneously, economic integration has limited the range of policy options available to states. This has diminished their capacity to meet these obligations. Sovereignty is the absolute authority over a certain territory. Many commentators would agree that this absolute authority has been challenged by a number of forces operating beyond the nation state; from the threat of global terrorism to the challenges of climate change, the powers of international organizations to influence of the global market. Given the impact of the global financial crisis on the national economic policy, I want to explore the ways in which capitalism has changed the nature of state sovereignty. This limitation of states‘ capacity must be understood as both an active and a reactive process. Active in terms of formulating policy in favor of market principles which the structure of globalisation encourages. Reactive in terms of responding to shocks, crises and booms in the global economy. In both cases, states are no longer entirely free, or entirely sovereign, to enact policy of their own determination.…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cited: 1. Keohane, Robert O. International lnstitutions and State Power: Essays in International Theory. Boulder: Westview Press, 1989…

    • 2386 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    sovereign equality of States, the maintenance of international peace and security, and the promotion of…

    • 7725 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Our collective history as human beings, however, tells a different story about our common interest and the way in which we have formally raised and torn down barriers to promote the same. We have, on the other hand, been separated on the basis of differing ideologies and the exercise of exclusive nationalism. Since the latter is a sentiment which resides in particular nations which have at their core a set legal framework validating their very existence and their interaction with other nations, it is essential to any study of law’s application to international relations. How does a sovereign nation reconcile its very sovereignty with its growing need to be integrated into a shrinking global society with its concomitant shrinking…

    • 3496 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to the Oxford English Dictionary, self-determination is the right or ability of a country or a person to manage their own affairs. Even though there are more than 208 nation states, there are still a number of people struggling for their rights towards self-determination. The United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights clearly states in Article 15 that everyone has the right to a nationality and no one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality or denied the right to change his nationality. But what are the criteria of identity for a ‘people’? Is it essential identity or contingent identity that make a people? In this essay I am going to analyze the methods towards self-determination, who has rights to self-determination, stages of self-determination, self-determination beyond nation states and the notion of self-determination as a right.…

    • 2058 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Since every state possess sovereignty and jurisdictional powers and since every state must consist of a collection of individual human beings, it is essential that a link between the two be legally established. The link connecting the state and the people it includes its territory is provided by the concept of nationality.…

    • 5269 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    importance of sovereignty

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Although much criticized, the concept of sovereignty is still central to most thinking about international relations and particularly international law. The concept is condemned in context of a nation-state 's "right" to monopolize certain exercises of power with respect to its territory and citizens but it is still prized by those who maintain certain "realist" views or who otherwise wish to prevent (sometimes with justification) foreign or international powers and authorities from interfering in a national government 's decisions and activities. It cannot be ignored that sovereignty is an essential ingredient of the State as it makes the State supreme in both internal and external matters. A State can only be independent if it enjoys sovereignty. Furthermore, when one begins to analyse and disaggregate the concept of sovereignty, it quickly becomes apparent that it has many dimensions and several important functions. For example, the concept is central to the idea of "EQUALITY OF NATIONS". The concept of equality of nations is linked to sovereignty concepts because sovereignty has fostered the idea that there is no higher power than the nation-state, so it is "sovereignty" that negates the idea that there is a higher power, whether foreign or international (unless consented to by the nation-state).…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    While some people may argue that the rise of modern technology brings about a global market, which subsequently compromises the necessity of sovereign states, this is not the case. Indeed, the perpetual development of superior technology facilitates international trade and communication. However, there is no evidence that the phenomenon called globalization necessarily leads to the dissolution of sovereignty. Globalization may make the state more difficult to manage, but the sovereignty nevertheless still remains. If globalization eradicated state borders, and united the world through its super effective forms of communications and electronic business transactions, then the result would be a singular body of people that has no evident leader to enforce law and order. Therefore, although globalization may create an image of borderless countries, the state still remains to prevent mass chaos and disorder.…

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    There is no doubt that globalization has had an impact on the nation state. However, it…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Global Justice

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Global Justice became a major concern for the western states in the last decade. Increased international interaction, especially in social media, has given people the chance to interact with each other from all around the world. Aristotle once said “man is by nature a social animal.” We feel the need to interact with each other exactly because we’re human beings. Our interaction and communication seems to be an emotional rather than rational experience. One can claim that we might feel the need to relate and identify with another human being. This in fact is what makes us form communities and nations, basing it on our collective memory and shared identity. I believe that this is the true path to global justice. Even though non-relational theory holds true ideally, in practice only by relating to other people we would feel the need to uphold their basic human rights.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays