Preview

Why did William defeat Harold in the Battle of Hastings

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
882 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why did William defeat Harold in the Battle of Hastings
Why did William defeat Harold in the Battle of Hastings? The astonishing battle of Hastings was fought on the 14th of October at 9:30am 1066 shortly after King Edward the Confessor sorrowfully died in a coma on the night of the 5th of January 1066. The battle was fought on Senlac hill approximately 10km northwest of Hastings. So as we all know the battle of Hastings occurred 100s of Years ago, 938 to be precise and we can never really distinguish every inch of the truth, at least we think we cant… However I’m trying to find out why William duke of Normandy Defeated Harold Godwinson King of England at the Battle of Hastings. This essay will decide why William won the Battle of Hasting I’ll be looking at the three following factors: their preparation for Battle, their Leadership and their tactics during the brutal battle.

The first argument as to why William won the Battle of Hastings is that he had, by far, the most unsurpassable army. The Normans (Williams army) had 7500 warriors, all fully trained compared to the 3000 voluntary village workers and only 2000 professionally trained soldiers that made up Harold Godwinson’s English army. Likewise, William had many archers and slingshots (unlike the English) that could kill and do a great amount of damage from approximately 180 meters away! The Normans were also well equipped with some of Normandy’s finest auxiliaries – blacksmiths, carpenters, medics and cooks – as well as a few mercenaries; they were professional soldiers who fought for whoever paid them the most amount of money. Williams men also had better armour and weapons, for example: the cavalry were equipped with mail hauberks, also there is some evidence that archers may have also used crossbows in addition to bows and arrows, some heavy-duty battle maces were also used along with the obvious spears and swords. In the End the Normans had to use 300 boats to carry 7500 men and 2000 horses.

In addition to this point, the battle

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    On the 22nd of August 1485 Richard III, the last Plantagenet King, was defeated and killed in the Battle of Bosworth against Henry Tudor, who would found a dynasty which would feature the first Queen to rule in her own right and would last until 1603. Richard had over twice as many men as Henry but was defeated when, trying to get to Henry, Richard was slain by a rush of cavalry led by Sir William Stanley, the brother of Henry’s step father. However there are many contributing factors to Richard’s death and defeat including, Richard’s pride, Henry’s support from France and Wales, and the support from the Stanley’s at the crucial moment.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Secondly, at the Battle of Hastings itself, the English did not have any cavalry where as the Normans did which mean that they had an advantage. During the battle, the English King Harold was wounded and the Normans got scared a retreat which fooled the English soldiers into thinking that they had won. They all broke ranks and ran towards the Normans. Finally Harold was killed and the English lost the Standard and William had won.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Thanks to the friendly winds which guided us across the channel, we arrive unopposed on English shores. Defenses are built and fortified as the men, motivated by my words feast on food and wine as we await the moment of truth. We have the advantage over the enemy, for the horses we ride provide us strength and quickness. We are truly blessed that the English have turned back Harald Hadrada and the Norwegians at Stamford Bridge. Now there is one less opponent to fight for my crown. Though battle tested and weary, Harold of Wessex will not easily relinquish what is rightfully mine. Remember, it is Harold who swore allegiance to me after I freed him from Count Guy of Ponthieu. I gave him arms and armor as he swore the sacred oath upon saintly relics. That oath, a pledge to support my claim to the English throne was broken (New World Encyclopedia, 2009).…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the battle of Bosworth field, Richard seems to have had a larger number of fighting men than Tudor and also held the higher ground, however many contemporaries stated that the battle was largely a stalemate, suggesting that Tudor’s preparations for battle had been successful, at least for the fact that he was able to hold his own against an opponent with greater numbers and a more preferable geographical position. It was not until Richard’s fateful “suicide charge”; a charge with the aim of directly attacking the oppositions leader, rather than being explicitly suicidal. Thanks to the Swiss-trained French mercenaries in Henry’s garrison and their tactics never before seen on English soil and Thomas, Lord Stanley’s last minute decision to support Henry, Richard was killed and Tudor took his crown. Thus Henry’s success in replacing Richard of York as king of England, would not be as we know it had Richard not made the dramatic charge that resulted in his death, but whether the success would ever have occurred is still yet to be explored.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For William the Conqueror, success was a way of life. During his reign as king of England, William conquered three locations. The first was in Pevensey in the South of England, after, he went toward Hastings and Fought at Senlac Hill, lastly he took England. William the Conqueror was one of the most influential men in history.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William’s archers went first their aim was not great as they were shooting uphill consequently hitting the shield wall and soaring over their heads. Next William sent in his cavalry (men on horses) to attack but because there was a shield wall the hoses could not get past therefore the Normans were safe.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first argument as to why William won the battle of Hastings, is that he had the bet army. The Normans had 7500 men, all fully trained compared to the 4500 village workers and only 500 professionally trained soldiers that made up Harold’s army. Also, William had many archers that could kill from 100 meters way. The Normans were also equipped with blacksmiths, carpenters, medics and cooks as well as a few mercenaries, who were professional soldiers that fought for whoever paid them the most amount of money, on his side. Williams’s men also had better weapons and armour, for example: the cavalry were all equipped with mail hauberk, there is some evidence some of the archers used crossbows in addition to bows and arrows, some battle maces were also used along with spears and swords, round and kite shaped shields mean that the Normans were more protected from the English. Another benefit that William had was his great leadership skills.…

    • 544 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bayeux Tapestry Letter

    • 1324 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Bayeux Tapestry was one of the most memorable and successful battles that I have ever participated in as a Norman soldier. The battle was fought between the mighty Norman soldiers and the English soldiers. It was also called the Battle of Hastings because it was fought in Hastings, England. Harold, who was the king of England at the time of the battle, had murdered his brother, and thus, his position as king was disputed. The Duke of Normandy, the Conqueror led my side, the Normans to war. In reality, William was supposed to be the King of England, and this battle was meant to prove this. Duke William has been known to be extremely successful in the battlefield, and this has branded him as a victorious military commander. Before the battle, we travelled by water to England (BBC, 2010).…

    • 1324 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    1066: The Year of the Conquest, written by David Howarth, tells of one of the most important dates in the history of England. In 1066, William the Conqueror and William of Orange fought the historical Battle of Hastings. The outcome of this battle lead to many changes to the English people. The Norman people became assimilated into the English way of life. Howarth proceeds to tell the tale of the Battle of Hastings through the eyes on a common Englishman.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While I was reading 1066 I learned a lot about the history of England and how the Battle of Hastings nearly destroyed it, but the English refused to let their country die. Some of the events of that year are still being debated over but there is no way to know exactly how the events played…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first argument as to why William won the Battle of Hastings is that he had the best army. The Normans had 7500 men, all fully trained compared to the 4500 voluntary village workers and only 500 professionally trained soldiers that made up Harold Godwinson’s English army. William had many archers and slingshots, the Normans were also equipped with auxiliaries - blacksmiths, carpenters, medics and cooks – as well as a few mercenaries, who were professional soldiers that fought for whoever paid them the most amount of money.…

    • 676 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apparently it was said that on King Edward's death bed, Edward promised to him that he would be able to take care of his wife and of his kingdom. But Harald Hardrada and William of Normandy say otherwise. William, Duke of Normandy, won the Battle of Hastings on the 14th of October 1066. One of the main reasons he achieved this was because he was very well prepared. In this essay I will explain further how William won the Battle of Hastings in 1066.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This battle caused a huge change in the environment and government policies. A major significance in this event was the amount of lives that were taken based on a petty battle. Up to at least 10,000 men were believed to have died in this battle, it is yet to be true since there is no leftover evidence of bodies buried. In my own opinion, the question I continue to ask myself is, Why was Harold Godwinson’s army so unprepared knowing William’s constant anger toward the fact he was not in power. Reasons why Harold was unprepared as because Duke William had attacked before they were properly ready. While in battle, some of his best fighters as died in the previous battle, The Battle of Stamford Bridge, and the rest of soldiers were tired from the battle and the journey south. While in battle, the English were holding it together but the Normans tricked the English by pretending of retreat back. The English followed behind, leading their strong position on a hill, but then Harold Godwinson had died. In the event of his death, his army grew weak and ended up losing the battle. In this battle though, William was extremely lucky and only truly won based on the trick he played on the English during the battle. When William conquered the Normans, he completely had begun a new policy. Though, William wasn't fully English he still brought his native tongue to the English court. Some forms of French would remain the…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Battle of Agincourt

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages

    King Henry V went back to lick his wounds and started a pep rally with his army. Later on, The English armies overcame the French rally killing numerous men and making the French retreat. The English won the Battle of Agincourt because Henry V 's speech to get the English armies ready to fight.…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many correctly regard the Battle of Agincourt as a courageous English victory, a battle where men who were tired, hungry and standing in their own diarrhoea somehow found the will to fight against an enemy almost five times larger, and won. The other common thought is also the battle was won by the use of the longbow. This is not true. The victory went to the English because of French mistakes and the men who were holding the longbows.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays