Preview

Why did William defeat Harold in the Battle of Hastings

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
882 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why did William defeat Harold in the Battle of Hastings
Why did William defeat Harold in the Battle of Hastings? The astonishing battle of Hastings was fought on the 14th of October at 9:30am 1066 shortly after King Edward the Confessor sorrowfully died in a coma on the night of the 5th of January 1066. The battle was fought on Senlac hill approximately 10km northwest of Hastings. So as we all know the battle of Hastings occurred 100s of Years ago, 938 to be precise and we can never really distinguish every inch of the truth, at least we think we cant… However I’m trying to find out why William duke of Normandy Defeated Harold Godwinson King of England at the Battle of Hastings. This essay will decide why William won the Battle of Hasting I’ll be looking at the three following factors: their preparation for Battle, their Leadership and their tactics during the brutal battle.

The first argument as to why William won the Battle of Hastings is that he had, by far, the most unsurpassable army. The Normans (Williams army) had 7500 warriors, all fully trained compared to the 3000 voluntary village workers and only 2000 professionally trained soldiers that made up Harold Godwinson’s English army. Likewise, William had many archers and slingshots (unlike the English) that could kill and do a great amount of damage from approximately 180 meters away! The Normans were also well equipped with some of Normandy’s finest auxiliaries – blacksmiths, carpenters, medics and cooks – as well as a few mercenaries; they were professional soldiers who fought for whoever paid them the most amount of money. Williams men also had better armour and weapons, for example: the cavalry were equipped with mail hauberks, also there is some evidence that archers may have also used crossbows in addition to bows and arrows, some heavy-duty battle maces were also used along with the obvious spears and swords. In the End the Normans had to use 300 boats to carry 7500 men and 2000 horses.

In addition to this point, the battle

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    William 's later chroniclers claim (after the fact) that Edward the Confessor offered William the crown and sent Harold to pledge it to him in the Winter of 1064/5. In fact, reading between the lines we can see that Harold was shipwrecked in Normandy whilst trying to visit France, and took advantage of the situation by trying to secure the release of his brother & nephew who were held as hostages in…

    • 9305 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the two armies finally met at the Battle of Stamford Bridge, Harold proves to be victorious. This was thought to be a huge victory and a defining moment for England until Harold discovers some interesting news. As Harold and his men were just enjoying a huge victory in battle, they learn of Duke William and his army coming in on the southern coast of England. This was important because right after a critical battle in the northern part of England, Harold must now navigate his troops back down to the southern coast in a desperate attempt to defend…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Williams victory in 1066 is suprising in some ways, this is because King Harold came up with some good choices. Harold was smart enough to think of making a shield wall with his army. By making a shield wall, William's army would have been struggling to fight them. The shield wall was formed by every man in the army to stand shoulder to shoulder to make it more stronger. Each shield was made from wood and covered in metal which would help the shield wall more protective and stronger. Another good choice from King Harold was positioning his army at the top of Senlac Hill. This was a good choice because William's army were firing arrows at them. This would result in the arrows being fired and missing Harold's army completely.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    William did not know it yet, but by allowing this to happen he had already lost the battle before it began. All William had to do was put more guards…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When William I invaded England in 1066 he did so on horseback. In the battle of Hastings the foot-soldier based army of the English wilted under the charge of the Norman knights. With this conquest, Marcus Bull argues, the old era of foot-soldier armies was wiped away and the new era of the horse-backed knight began.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the battle of Bosworth field, Richard seems to have had a larger number of fighting men than Tudor and also held the higher ground, however many contemporaries stated that the battle was largely a stalemate, suggesting that Tudor’s preparations for battle had been successful, at least for the fact that he was able to hold his own against an opponent with greater numbers and a more preferable geographical position. It was not until Richard’s fateful “suicide charge”; a charge with the aim of directly attacking the oppositions leader, rather than being explicitly suicidal. Thanks to the Swiss-trained French mercenaries in Henry’s garrison and their tactics never before seen on English soil and Thomas, Lord Stanley’s last minute decision to support Henry, Richard was killed and Tudor took his crown. Thus Henry’s success in replacing Richard of York as king of England, would not be as we know it had Richard not made the dramatic charge that resulted in his death, but whether the success would ever have occurred is still yet to be explored.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bayeux Tapestry

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I was just writing you to let you know that we will be able to come home soon because the Battle of Hastings is over and the enemy is retreating. The battle was called the Battle of Hasting because it was fought in Hastings, England. As a Norman soldier the Battle of Hastings was one of the most successful and memorable battles that I ever participated in. Duke William has always had a reputation of being a success on the battle field, but this victory has branded him as a victorious military leader. Harold the king of England at the time of the battle had murdered his brother and his kingship was disputed. As we all know the throne should have been Williams Duke of Normandy but that Harold cheated his way into it. Duke William had prepared for a battle with Harold months in advanced. The whole dispute started after the death of King Edward. King Edward died on January 5, 1066 and he didn’t have an official heir to his throne. The day after King Edwards death, Harold self-proclaimed himself the king of England illegally and took the throne as Harold the second. Once Duke William heard this new it outraged him and he began gathering his army and went to seek the approval of the pope to become England’s new king.…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many correctly regard the Battle of Agincourt as a courageous English victory, a battle where men who were tired, hungry and standing in their own diarrhoea somehow found the will to fight against an enemy almost five times larger, and won. The other common thought is also the battle was won by the use of the longbow. This is not true. The victory went to the English because of French mistakes and the men who were holding the longbows.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Bayeux Tapestry itself is known for its depictions of battle preparations and the fighting in which William of Normandy gained England. For Gerald of Wales, the military operations within Ireland are not his primary focus, but much can be inferred from his notes of the inefficient military behaviors of the Irish. Both sources reflect on the actual technological weaponry used during the time, both by the Normans and the groups that they are attempting to subjugate. These in turn create a perception of an overwhelming occupation force, in which the indigenous population could never expect to…

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Who Won the War of 1812

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Britain’s numbers alone would not suffice if their army wanted any hope because the American soldiers outnumbered Britain alone from 10 to 1. Canada and the Natives helped supply more soldiers with militia, their navy and a lot of troops so that the numbers pulled up and Britain had 6000 soldiers while America had 7000. The forces of the Natives and the Canadians to the Britain were extremely stellar and strong even though they were lacking 1000 men that America had. Each regular man was trained to be top-class soldiers so that they would not fear cannons, gunshots and swords. America had normal training because they had the numbers to outdo Britain but the difference is that Britain’s soldiers were much more competent with handling war than America’s soldiers.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two armies would throw their infantry at each other and charge with the cavalry when the general deemed it right. The stronger army always won because there was no "coming in on the left flank" or "drawing your enemy into an ambush" or any of that stuff. But it didn't take long for the English to discover the usefulness of archers. They used yeomen, English farmers who were good with the longbow. The English army contained 80-90% yeomen with the rest being men-at-arms. Each 100 yeomen (called a century) were led by a centenaur, who repeated the orders of the Master of the Archers (a knight who was uncommon, for he was skilled with the longbow). The Master of the Archers told them when and where to shoot, sending about 60,000 arrows a minute at the enemy. When the opposing army had been reduced, the yeomen teamed up on the nobles and captured them for ransom. This made the yeomen very rich, for ransoms could be as much as thousands of ducats. The Swiss also had a good deal going. They reinvented the Greek phalanx with less armor and more maneuverability so they couldn't get hit in the flanks.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For William the Conqueror, success was a way of life. During his reign as king of England, William conquered three locations. The first was in Pevensey in the South of England, after, he went toward Hastings and Fought at Senlac Hill, lastly he took England. William the Conqueror was one of the most influential men in history.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1066: The Year of the Conquest, written by David Howarth, tells of one of the most important dates in the history of England. In 1066, William the Conqueror and William of Orange fought the historical Battle of Hastings. The outcome of this battle lead to many changes to the English people. The Norman people became assimilated into the English way of life. Howarth proceeds to tell the tale of the Battle of Hastings through the eyes on a common Englishman.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While I was reading 1066 I learned a lot about the history of England and how the Battle of Hastings nearly destroyed it, but the English refused to let their country die. Some of the events of that year are still being debated over but there is no way to know exactly how the events played…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Thanks to the friendly winds which guided us across the channel, we arrive unopposed on English shores. Defenses are built and fortified as the men, motivated by my words feast on food and wine as we await the moment of truth. We have the advantage over the enemy, for the horses we ride provide us strength and quickness. We are truly blessed that the English have turned back Harald Hadrada and the Norwegians at Stamford Bridge. Now there is one less opponent to fight for my crown. Though battle tested and weary, Harold of Wessex will not easily relinquish what is rightfully mine. Remember, it is Harold who swore allegiance to me after I freed him from Count Guy of Ponthieu. I gave him arms and armor as he swore the sacred oath upon saintly relics. That oath, a pledge to support my claim to the English throne was broken (New World Encyclopedia, 2009).…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays