Preview

Medieval European Warfare Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1250 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Medieval European Warfare Research Paper
Medieval European Warfare
Weapons
In early to mid Medieval Europe, the armies had nothing very complicated. The nobles had solid iron weapons, and the not as rich had brass coated in iron. There was the lance, the spear, the pike, throwing axe, battle axe, short sword, the horsebow, the longsword, broadsword, dagger, shortbow, longbow, crossbow, mallet, mace, greatsword, serrated sword, halberd, throwing knives, and the wrist knife. The lance, dagger, longsword, and horse bow were generally used by cavalry. The lance, battle axe, longsword, broadsword, dagger, mace, greatsword, and the halberd were used by men-at-arms, or knights. The serrated sword, throwing daggers, shortbow, and wrist knife were used by assasins. The longbow, mallet,
…show more content…
Everybody immediately began developing weapons with it. The French invented the cannon and firearm, making France a major power with England and also lead to the downfall of many lesser nobles who couldn't afford cannon-proof fortifications. Castles were expensive anyway (as much as 13,000,000 ducats) so the lesser nobles could barely afford a regular castle(considering a king got 12 million ducats a year). The weapons used for seige warfare were the ballista, battering ram, and seige tower that could allow experienced archers to have more …show more content…
Two armies would throw their infantry at each other and charge with the cavalry when the general deemed it right. The stronger army always won because there was no "coming in on the left flank" or "drawing your enemy into an ambush" or any of that stuff. But it didn't take long for the English to discover the usefulness of archers. They used yeomen, English farmers who were good with the longbow. The English army contained 80-90% yeomen with the rest being men-at-arms. Each 100 yeomen (called a century) were led by a centenaur, who repeated the orders of the Master of the Archers (a knight who was uncommon, for he was skilled with the longbow). The Master of the Archers told them when and where to shoot, sending about 60,000 arrows a minute at the enemy. When the opposing army had been reduced, the yeomen teamed up on the nobles and captured them for ransom. This made the yeomen very rich, for ransoms could be as much as thousands of ducats. The Swiss also had a good deal going. They reinvented the Greek phalanx with less armor and more maneuverability so they couldn't get hit in the flanks.

Qualities of a Good Soldier For men-at-arms, some good qualities were a code of honor (chivalry), weapons skill, good horsemanship, and rich (needed enough money for horse, armor, and weapons). For yeomen, good qualities were discipline, skill with a bow, and flexibility (could be called to war at any time by the king). For infantry,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Weapons In The Crusades

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Next, weapons evolved throughout the process of the crusades. Just as the people developed armor throughout the medieval time period surrounding the crusades, knights began to use more effective and dangerous weapons in combat with their enemy. Two different types of weapons were used during the Crusades: close combat weapons such as swords, maces, spears, and poleaxes, but also long distance weapons such as long bows and crossbows. Blacksmiths softened iron and then shaped the metal into customized weights, lengths, widths, and also shape for both swords and spears. Bows would be used for long distance attack and could be used on foot or on horseback. During the Crusades, the archers with long bows would line up and fire over city walls…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Weapons of the Crusades

    • 2574 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The Crusades were extremely violent times. With constant pressure to take back the holy city, armies were constantly fighting and killing. They were also always trying to find better and more efficient ways to fight and kill. Old weapons were engineered to be more destructive, new weapons were invented to destroy the ever-advancing technology in fortification. The three main categories of weaponry that were most important to the crusades were foot soldiers, knights, and siege weapons.…

    • 2574 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The knight held the spear near the centre of the handle so that the weight was balanced when carrying the spear. The Knight would have thrown the spear over the heads of his troops to get it over the top of the opponent's shield. The spear was held and thrown like a javelin for distance and force. Spears were more difficult to use than other weapons as they had to be thrown correctly to get to the desired destination.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In fourteenth and fifteenth century armies the profession of arms could lead to the ennoblement of the lowliest man-at-arms. For example, the Black Prince's second in command was a lowly noble who carved out vast power and estates for himself by virtues of military prowess. Bertrand du Guesclin was pronounced France's flower of chivalry. After 40% of France's nobility were lost at Poitiers this man rose through the ranks to become France's for-most knight. However English historians - notably Keen - take great glee in pointing out the Bertrand was a Breton axe-man. Keen remarks 'in the case of Du Guesclin, it is hard indeed to dissociate the man who became the great Constable of France from the mercenary riff-raff who were so often his campaign companions' (Keen, Chivalry, pg. 232). Nonetheless, the late middle ages was a time when one could easily become famous and rich by feat of arms. Oliver de La March remarked on nobility at the…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prior to WW1, cavalry units were deemed to be a commander’s definitive principle weapon, in any case, since the beginning of WW1 and the idea of…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Their adoption was revolutionary, for it enabled a heavily armored horseman to retain his balance in the saddle whilst using a weighty spear, sword, or lance. (Seth-Smith, 28) As technology advanced so did the weapons used. Knights going into battle would be equipped with swords and daggers, the most common weapons used in hand to hand combat. Blades were specially designed for its owner so weight, length, and handle design all varied (Jordan 180). Some knights would be skilled enough to shoot a bow and arrow while riding their horse. Armor was used to cover both the knight and his horse. Another weapon that was used while riding the horse was the lance. This was a 9 to 14 foot pole made of wood with a steel tip. It would be used to unhorse enemies. Scale armor was one of the earliest forms of armor made from bronze, iron, leather, and even bones. The problem with this type of armor is that knights were not able to maneuver while riding on their horse. This problem was fixed with the later invention of chain mail armor. This was made from metal rings linked together to form a mesh (Jordan 181). All of these weapons and armors were used in battle by knights, who took all of the same items and turned them to…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first reliable sources which assert the existence of guns appeared in the 1320s, and from the late 1330s the number of references to them rose dramatically. The early guns were of large calibre and used almost exclusively for sieges, although as early as Crécy in 1346, the English "fired off some cannons which they had brought to the battle to frighten the Genoese." Guns were made in one of two ways. Firstly, there were cast metal guns, usually of bronze, which were made at the foundry. These were usually the better weapons because they were made of a single piece of metal and therefore were less likely to burst apart on firing. The second method was arranging wrought iron strips into tubes which were then bound together with iron hoops in much the same way as barrels were made. The advantage of these guns was that iron was a much cheaper metal than bronze (but could not be cast), but being made of many pieces faults were more likely to develop, causing either the release of explosive pressure through the sides of the barrel…

    • 4632 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The purpose of the trench warfare was so that defending units could be protected by small arms fire and provide sheltered against artillery. This shows they would protect as much land from the enemy. Trench warfare was very important in WW1 this is because when the Germans realized that they were going to lose due to Russia and France they dug in and tried not to let the enemy take any of their land back so that their country would grow bigger and stronger. I will be answering the question about, how effective was Trench warfare in World War 1, and how effective was it as a method used by both sides in war Triple Entente and Triple Alliance.…

    • 1918 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    attack; however, most castles had the same tactic so they knew how to attack one another. There…

    • 2505 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The invention of the powerful artillery guns would change man 's role in warring engagements. The artillery guns at first were very limited by their own design. The guns were very heavy and had to be transported by water, which meant that only towns and fortresses that were close to a body of water could be attacked with artillery also known as the cannon. There were also some fortresses that were impervious to the early cannon attacks based on strong designs or natural defenses. The French were able to penetrate the round shaped castles and large walls during the late 1400s by using concentrated fire of several small guns instead of a few large ones.…

    • 2114 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Battle Analysis Outline

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. Review the tactical situation – why a particular action was or was not taken…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cannons had a lot of use for taking off heads in the battlefield but they weren’t accurate, they were better for take down bigger targets like boats. Swords, knives, bayonets, and pistol butts were used back then for close combat fighting or even charging. Rifles, muskets and pistols were used most widely between the two armies since they were easier to move then cannons and more accurate. Something that both armies were trying to make at this time was the grenade, they wanted to get something that would explode overhead and rain nails and other sharp objects, but most of them would just hit someone or the ground and not explode. When they did explode they did tremendous…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    His army was so well disciplined and employed communication techniques on the battlefield that it is said that the army well over 100,000 men at the end of his campaign could perform complicated battlefield maneuvers in battle very easily. These maneuvers could be likened to the closing of a hand, that some would retreat, flank, and the attack again, all of this in the middle of a battle. Another thing that helped win the day was the use of the composite bow, a bow almost half the size of the English Longbow that could be employed from horseback with deadly precision.…

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Battle of Agincourt

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages

    At the beginning, the English had 5000 archers and 900 gunmen and the French had 20,000 to 30,000 men. The two armies lined up in lines, the first 1000 yards apart. The English were the first to advance, moving into range of the archers. The French, getting shot at with arrows, charged the English lines, the French rally and push the English back killing many men. (The Great Battles)…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Battle of Leipzig

    • 1840 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The French and allied contingents side had a total of 225,000 soldiers. These were 160,000 from France, 15,000 Poles, 10,000 Italians, and 40,000 Germans. The coalition armies had a total of 380,000 soldiers. They included 145,000 Russians, 115,000 Austrians, 90,000 Prussians and 25,000 Swedish soldiers. The Napoleon side had about 700 cannons to its disposal while the allied contingents had about 1500 cannons. The allied side had 101,000 infantrymen and 26,000 cavalries while the French had 151,300 infantrymen and 41,300 cavalries. There was the use of heavy cavalries armed with long and straight sabers or broadsword. The light cavalries had short and curved sabers. All cavalry men used pistols, carbines and rifles. Heavy cavalry composed of large and required big strong horses. As a result, there was a deficiency in speed and endurance. Body armor used included cuirass and helmet. The cuirass protected the soldiers against shots fired from muskets and pistols from long distances.…

    • 1840 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays