Preview

1066: Year of the Conquest

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
923 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
1066: Year of the Conquest
World Civilization I
Dr. Edward McGee
October 26, 2008

Book Review of 1066: The Year of the Conquest.
1066: The Year of the Conquest, written by David Howarth, tells of one of the most important dates in the history of England. In 1066, William the Conqueror and William of Orange fought the historical Battle of Hastings. The outcome of this battle lead to many changes to the English people. The Norman people became assimilated into the English way of life. Howarth proceeds to tell the tale of the Battle of Hastings through the eyes on a common Englishman. David Howarth's writing style is unique. He allows the story to develop on its own. The story flows and the events do not seem forced. The story reads like a historical novel and is easy to follow. Howarth presents his information fully and does not leave anything for the reader to question. The reader does not become confused or lost because of the way that the author reveals his information in the book. Howarth use of sources throughout his book is a strong point that he uses. Howarth shows the different perspectives that have been viewed through history. He gives his own insights and tries to show the reader the different view points. History can be taken in many different ways and Howarth gives reasons and evidence to support his claims. Within the reading of this book, one has to realize that most of the literature has very religious overtones that run rife throughout the most works of this time. Howarth makes a great attempt to not let this influence the way he brings forth the history of the time. Making sure he does not let this affect his judgment, he does a great job of citing lots of sources and scrutinizing all of these along the way. He makes sure his facts are as accurate as possible as well as sifting all of the propaganda from the truth. The religious overtones are one of these obstacles that Howarth is able to overcome, enabling him to bring forth the battle of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Williams victory in 1066 is suprising in some ways, this is because King Harold came up with some good choices. Harold was smart enough to think of making a shield wall with his army. By making a shield wall, William's army would have been struggling to fight them. The shield wall was formed by every man in the army to stand shoulder to shoulder to make it more stronger. Each shield was made from wood and covered in metal which would help the shield wall more protective and stronger. Another good choice from King Harold was positioning his army at the top of Senlac Hill. This was a good choice because William's army were firing arrows at them. This would result in the arrows being fired and missing Harold's army completely.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Battle of Hastings was fought on the 14th October 1066 (shortly after King Edward the confessor had died) between Harold Godwinson and William of Normandy. The battle was fought on Senlac hill 10 kilometres away from Hastings. The battle started because when King Edward died, he left no heir to the throne. The men who claimed to be king were Harald Hadrada, Harold Godwinson and William of Normandy. This essay will decide why William won the battle of Hastings by looking at the tree following factors: William’s skill, Harold’s poor leadership and Harold’s bad luck.…

    • 544 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Battle of Hastings was a battle between William of Normandy and Harold Godwinson, it was a fight for the throne after Edward the Confessor died, leaving no heirs to the throne. In 1066, Harold Hardrada, William of Normandy and Harold Godwinson had all claimed that they were the next king so the battle began. Once Harold Hardrada had lost at The Battle of Stamford Bridge, William and Harold were left for the throne. This was when the Battle of Hastings took place, William had won. Luck was not the only reason William had won, it was because he had strengths and Harold had many weaknesses.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apparently it was said that on King Edward's death bed, Edward promised to him that he would be able to take care of his wife and of his kingdom. But Harald Hardrada and William of Normandy say otherwise. William, Duke of Normandy, won the Battle of Hastings on the 14th of October 1066. One of the main reasons he achieved this was because he was very well prepared. In this essay I will explain further how William won the Battle of Hastings in 1066.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Battle of Hastings was fought on 14th October 1066 - between Harold Godwinson of England and William of Normandy. The conflict started because when King Edward died, he left no heir to inherit the crown, which left three men claiming to be the next King of England. These three contenders to the throne were Harold Godwinson who was the only Englishman and related to the old king by marriage, Harald Hadrada and William the Conqueror who was the only contender that was related to King Edward by blood.…

    • 676 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I was pleased to find that Blevins writes this book as an Arkansas native rather than an opinionated outsider with no identity in the subject of his work. I feel that it is this factor alone that gives the book such a genuine feel. I was also pleased to find that Blevins once worked as a professor at Lyon College, which is located in my hometown. This gives me an even stronger sense of familiarity with him. The book is intended to be read by anyone interested in the subject, although it seems natural that interest would be primarily with historians and Arkansas natives. It is this reader's interest that actually influences the effectiveness of Blevins's writing. Obviously, efferent readers and aesthetic readers will be…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bayeux Tapestry Letter

    • 1324 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Bayeux Tapestry was one of the most memorable and successful battles that I have ever participated in as a Norman soldier. The battle was fought between the mighty Norman soldiers and the English soldiers. It was also called the Battle of Hastings because it was fought in Hastings, England. Harold, who was the king of England at the time of the battle, had murdered his brother, and thus, his position as king was disputed. The Duke of Normandy, the Conqueror led my side, the Normans to war. In reality, William was supposed to be the King of England, and this battle was meant to prove this. Duke William has been known to be extremely successful in the battlefield, and this has branded him as a victorious military commander. Before the battle, we travelled by water to England (BBC, 2010).…

    • 1324 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The purpose of this activity is for you to be an active reader and thinker during your reading of the text; it is not formal writing. It is a place to record and explore ideas using writing as a tool for learning. This journal, in essence, is a log that records the conversation that you are having with the book. This journal will assist you in compiling textual evidence to be used for various writing assignments and discussions. Plan to read two-three chapters a week and submit journal entries accordingly.…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Medieval Falconry

    • 315 Words
    • 1 Page

    The year is 1066, William I, not yet known as the conqueror, was leading his forces into England in attempt to take what he believed was rightfully his, the throne of Enlgand. His opponent and past acquiantance Harold Godwinson, whose forces were recently weakened from the Norweigan attempt to take England, would meet him on the battlefield in a decisive battle that would determine the future of western civilization. William would ultimately be triumphant over Godwinson, and succeed to claim the throne and title of King of England. This battle would be known as the battle of hastings, and would be the most significant battle of the Norman Conquest.William I, the conqueror, would retire form the battle back to Normandy, where he would immediately instill numerous political policies and decide upon the creation of the most influential and intricate census in world history, the Domesday Book. Recorded within this book was the first historical account of the presence of falconry in Medieval Europe, despite numerous prior architectural and literary accounts.…

    • 315 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For William the Conqueror, success was a way of life. During his reign as king of England, William conquered three locations. The first was in Pevensey in the South of England, after, he went toward Hastings and Fought at Senlac Hill, lastly he took England. William the Conqueror was one of the most influential men in history.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Howarth’s writing style was very interesting because he complies an abundance of facts into an almost novelistic narrative. There is also three different versions of every major event in the book; English, Norman, and Scandinavian. The reasoning behind those parts are interesting because it shows the difference between the countries and their ability to provide reliable information. I also like how he described the excitement, pleasures, and…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bibliography: 1) Douglas Carnine, Carlos E. Cortes, Kenneth R. Curtis, & Anita T. Robinson, 7th Grade World History Medieval and early Modern Times, Student Handbook, McDougal Littell/Houghton Mifflin, 2006, Updated Information-Author: Herman, Clay; Publisher: LAUSD, 2002…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Achilles In The Iliad

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Aristotle said that the man who is incapable of working in common, or who in his self-sufficiency has no need of others, is no part of the community, and is like a beast or a god. Discuss the character of Achilles in light of this statement. Use plenty of examples, details, references, and quotations in the response.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    through the lens of each author with a set of specific historiographical questions as a guide. This…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a well-written essay, analyze the rhetorical choices Nick Carraway makes when introducing his story and argue whether or not the audience should think him credible by the end of Ch.1.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays