Preview

Hy Did William Win the Battle of Hastings?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
453 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hy Did William Win the Battle of Hastings?
On January 5th 1066, the English king Edward the Confessor died-childless. This meant that was going to be a fight over who would have the throne. There were three competitors- Harold Godwinson, William of Normandy, and Harald Hardrada. Harold Godwinson was an Englishman and was brother-in-law to Edward himself.
Apparently it was said that on King Edward's death bed, Edward promised to him that he would be able to take care of his wife and of his kingdom. But Harald Hardrada and William of Normandy say otherwise. William, Duke of Normandy, won the Battle of Hastings on the 14th of October 1066. One of the main reasons he achieved this was because he was very well prepared. In this essay I will explain further how William won the Battle of Hastings in 1066.
William assembled a great army of armoured knights, soldiers and archers. He also had a huge amount of ships to carry his army over the English Channel. William used the very clever trick of retreating down the hill to make the English follow and lose their ground. After that, the Norman army quickly doubled back on themselves and surrounded and killed the helpless English. As well as all this, William had a store of the finest weapons in France.
William was one of the bravest people of his time. When his army was having difficulties during the battle, he bravely led his army back up the hill to make another attack upon the English. Due to William's intelligence, he arranged his army in long rows, archers at the front to try and soften up the English's shield wall, foot soldiers in the middle, and the cavalry at the back for a big attack. The retreating trick explained in the above paragraph also shows great leadership.
Luckily for William, the wind changed direction in his favour on his journey north to England. When Harold had been fighting the Vikings in the north of England, some of his best troops were killed, giving a huge advantage to the Normans. Very luckily for the Normans, Harold was killed by

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    There were many factors contributing to the victory of William the Conqueror in 1066. Firstly, the English king Harold was prepared for a Norman invasion many months previously but shortly before it happened, the Vikings unexpectedly invaded in the north and Harold had to march his army up the country, fight them and march back down again before the Normans came.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ironically William was illiterate and never spoke a word of English however he had the largest impact on the English language than anyone before or since his time. He had four sons, five daughters and every monarch of England since, has been a direct descendent. In addition to his impact on the English language, “William is credited with kick starting England into the phase known as Medieval England; William was the victor at the Battle of Hastings; he introduced modern castle building techniques into Medieval England and by his death in 1087, he had financial tied down many people with the Doomsday Book.” (HistoryLearning 1). As mention, William died in September of 1087 when he suffered major internal damages caused by a blow to his stomach from a pommel on the saddle of a horse he was riding (HistoryLearning 1). After the bizarre injury William did not die immediately. He was taken to a suburb of Rouen where he suffered for five weeks in presence of his half brother Robert and his two youngest sons (Barlow 1). “His burial in St. Stephen’s Church, which he had built at Caen, was as eventful as his life. The funeral procession was disrupted by a fire in the town, a local noble complained he had been dispossessed of the land in which William was to be buried, and William’s body was broken as it was being forced into the stone coffin.” (Barlow…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William reset his archers to a good position enabling his archers to get a good aim, as a result of this it created the smallest of cracks in the shield wall, the Norman’s took their chance and ran up to them. After about an hour some Norman’s on the left side retreated and drew some Saxons out with them creating a big gap William started to use that tactic more until there where cracks everywhere, William then lined his archers up once again and shot. This was the fatal moment; Harold got an arrow in his eye therefore causing his death. This had a big effect on the Saxon’s, they didn’t fight as well, some ran away, but others stayed to fight…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first argument as to why William won the battle of Hastings, is that he had the bet army. The Normans had 7500 men, all fully trained compared to the 4500 village workers and only 500 professionally trained soldiers that made up Harold’s army. Also, William had many archers that could kill from 100 meters way. The Normans were also equipped with blacksmiths, carpenters, medics and cooks as well as a few mercenaries, who were professional soldiers that fought for whoever paid them the most amount of money, on his side. Williams’s men also had better weapons and armour, for example: the cavalry were all equipped with mail hauberk, there is some evidence some of the archers used crossbows in addition to bows and arrows, some battle maces were also used along with spears and swords, round and kite shaped shields mean that the Normans were more protected from the English. Another benefit that William had was his great leadership skills.…

    • 544 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bayeux Tapestry Letter

    • 1324 Words
    • 6 Pages

    There was an incredibly large fleet of warfare ships, which were used to transport me, the duke and other soldiers who fought in the war. The ship used by William was commonly known as the Mora, and it was the biggest from among the other ships. People close to Duke William said that the ship was a gift from his wife who was called Mathilda. The ship was extremely fast. Apart from the duke, there were other leaders, such as Odo, the Bishop of Bayeux. The number of soldiers was around seven thousand men. In Norman culture, the first born son inherits all the properties of the family, the rest of the sons are left to fend for themselves, unless the first born son decides to share his wealth with them. Most of the time, these sons choose to serve in war. This explains the excessive number of Norman soldiers. There were also other supporters of the duke that had come to support him, bringing with them able men to fight in the war. Bishop Odo came with the Bretons. There were also the French, who had been urged to join in the war by William. In return for their service to the duke, they were promised pieces of land. There were the Flemish as well, who would also get pieces of land.…

    • 1324 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    While I was reading 1066 I learned a lot about the history of England and how the Battle of Hastings nearly destroyed it, but the English refused to let their country die. Some of the events of that year are still being debated over but there is no way to know exactly how the events played…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William’s men also had better armour and weapons, for example there is some evidence that archers used crossbows in addition to bows and arrows, were also used along with spears and swords, round shields and kite shaped shields. This meant that the Normans were more protected from the English, than the English were from them as well as having weapons that could do more damage. Another benefit that William had as one of his skills was that he was a very good commander of his troops and organised his men very well.…

    • 676 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William was able to employ many different forms of the existing Anglo-Saxon English government and use them differently to his advantage. William was able to utilize the predominantly Norman royal household (remaining from Edward the Confessor’s reign), which was already the centre of government and develop this further by rewarding any Normans who had advised or helped during his conquest of England, therefore increasing the number of people from Norman origin in his court. By doing this William was able to surround himself with trusted advisors. This itself was not a complete turnaround as there had already been a strong influence of Norman culture in the royal household of Edward the confessor, who himself had been born in Normandy.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William was a good king and had a numerous amount of strengths. Throughout the Battle of Hastings, William had used clever tactics. Due to his smart tactics, archers were lined at the front to try and soften up the English's shield wall, when the Normans didn't make a difference to the wall William changed his tactics and cleverly tricked Harold by double backing on themselves and breaking the English's strong…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William was a great leader of England, his power and intelligence were just what the people needed. He brought many new systems and regimes, which was better for the people. William may not have been the most generous king, though he made England a better, safer place to live in. When a king can make the country’s standards of living better he’s defiantly a good king.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Luck and timing were central to William’s success at Hastings. Firstly, in advance of the campaign, two of William’s rivals had died; Henry, king of France and Count Fulk of Anjou. This was very significant to the campaign because it enabled William to leave Normandy feeling safe because his two main adversaries were dead, and permitted him to get to Hastings without agonizing over an invasion and to dedicate his full thought to the campaign which lay ahead. When he did embark on the campaign, the weather was in the favour of the Normans. Initially, William had intended to embark in July but owing to adverse winds, the invasion was delayed from the end of July to September; first at the River Dives and then at St. Valery on the Somme. Additionally the Navy were no longer at seas as only remained on the Seas until the 8th September. With the amalgamation of clear seas and good weather on the 28th September, the day of crossing, The Saxons crossed the channel in just over 24 hours. Moreover, unbeknownst to William, this also was an extremely auspicious time for him because if he had arrived at his intended time of crossing in July, Harold and the Saxon army would have been waiting for him. However, it was a time of unease for Harold that year, as it was apparent that England was going to be invaded by either a Norman or a Scandinavian Force, and so Harold was nervous throughout the entirety of his nine month rain. Harold, thinking that he could be ubiquitous, had troops both at the North and at the South, waiting in vain for these invasions; however this only tired out his troops and stretched his resources. The Scandinavians arrived first, and so Harold made the southern fyrd march north to fight the Vikings. The battles of Gate Fulford, led by Edwin and Morcar, and the Battle of Stanford Bridge, were both won by the Saxons, boosting their morale but nonetheless they suffered great losses and the troops were tired where…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Overall in this battle, William defeated Harold because of his luck, and that Harold was unprepared. The most important point in the Battle of Hastings was that William won the battle. He made a last-minute plan during the battle, a plan that resulted in the defeat of the English. And yet what if Harold hadn’t fallen for the trick? Or no Norman knight had doubted the presence of his leader? What if Harold hadn’t been killed? Where would they be as a country…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another component on William’s side was luck. The wind changed, and so the Normans managed to cross the Channel and arrive earlier than anticipated leaving the English in the North unprepared. The Bayeux Tapestry has pictures of William making a speech to his soldiers. William arranged his troops…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his quest to wrestle the throne of England from Harold, William had gathered an army of some 7,000 – 8,000 men, including calavary, Bretons, archers and men at arms. Yet on their first attempt they were denied access to the English coast because the wind was blowing in the wrong direction!…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William 's later chroniclers claim (after the fact) that Edward the Confessor offered William the crown and sent Harold to pledge it to him in the Winter of 1064/5. In fact, reading between the lines we can see that Harold was shipwrecked in Normandy whilst trying to visit France, and took advantage of the situation by trying to secure the release of his brother & nephew who were held as hostages in…

    • 9305 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Good Essays