When first approaching this problem, many would first try and define life. This only serves to further complicate the issue. One of the simplest …show more content…
One of these arguments involve a state known as a virion. A virion is a dormant state that the virus is in when there are no cells around to utilize. During this state, the virion does not grow or reproduce, but remains in equilibrium until their is a cell that it can infect. While many use this as a reason for why viruses are nonliving, I would say just the opposite. The fact that viruses become dormant virions when there are no cells nearby demonstrates an ability to recognize conditions which allow them to reproduce and grow so that they can take advantage of them. The second argument involves a virus’s metabolic processes. Viruses are unable to metabolize on their own and instead use the mitochondria of cells to do it for them. The weakness of this argument lies in the cells, not the viruses. When examining the organelles of cells, microbiologists have discovered that the mitochondria contain their own set of genetic DNA. This has been explained using the concept of coevolution. In this process, two organisms respond to one another's strength and weaknesses in order to further their ability to survive and reproduce. It is theorized that mitochondria were originally separate organisms that evolved with cells in order to benefit each other. The mitochondria produce energy for the cell and the cell reproduces itself and the mitochondria. This concept can also be applied to viruses, but in terms of a parasitic relationship. Viruses evolved without the ability to metabolize because, as long as there are cells, it is not necessary for their