Using the Chrm Decision-Making Framework, Consider an Organisation’s Actual or Potential Shrm Response to Influential Factors and Link Them to the Organisation’s Internal Hrm.
Human resources management.
Using the CHRM Decision-Making Framework, consider an organisation’s actual or potential SHRM response to influential factors and link them to the organisation’s internal HRM. * Executive Summary
As a tool for HRM the six step continuous-improvement HRM (CHRM) decision-making framework allows senior management and HRM to scan the internal and external environment for potential problems and opportunities. This report aligns HRM to management strategy and demonstrated the CHRM decision-making framework process to initiate measures for resolving problems or taking advantages of opportunities, using an analysis of the internal and external strengths and weaknesses, and opportunities and threats. Using a SWOT analysis potential problems were discovered and verified in the organisation. They are: * Knowledge management - Migration of senior managers leads to loss of tacit knowledge * Gender Diversity - Although women make up 41.7% of the work force only 3% of pilots are female * OH&S - Unsafe working conditions with smaller cabin crews and fewer staff available for flights
Using CHRM, HR managers are able to devise and implementation a strategic plan to attend to those potential problems or opportunities. This report has revealed that Qantas HRM can strategically align with organisational objectives by instigating the following plan * Conduct an honest, open review of organisational culture to discover and action an incentive to encourage senior management personnel to stay, that includes establishing a mentoring program.
* Active recruitment and selection aimed specifically at women pilots and initiatives for women to join pilot training programs.
* Annual review of OH&S situations involving staffing levels on flights, possible staff retraining, job-sharing options to increase staff numbers without increasing costs, and the implementation of team-bonding, morale raising initiatives.
Finally, the continual
Using the CHRM Decision-Making Framework, consider an organisation’s actual or potential SHRM response to influential factors and link them to the organisation’s internal HRM. * Executive Summary
As a tool for HRM the six step continuous-improvement HRM (CHRM) decision-making framework allows senior management and HRM to scan the internal and external environment for potential problems and opportunities. This report aligns HRM to management strategy and demonstrated the CHRM decision-making framework process to initiate measures for resolving problems or taking advantages of opportunities, using an analysis of the internal and external strengths and weaknesses, and opportunities and threats. Using a SWOT analysis potential problems were discovered and verified in the organisation. They are: * Knowledge management - Migration of senior managers leads to loss of tacit knowledge * Gender Diversity - Although women make up 41.7% of the work force only 3% of pilots are female * OH&S - Unsafe working conditions with smaller cabin crews and fewer staff available for flights
Using CHRM, HR managers are able to devise and implementation a strategic plan to attend to those potential problems or opportunities. This report has revealed that Qantas HRM can strategically align with organisational objectives by instigating the following plan * Conduct an honest, open review of organisational culture to discover and action an incentive to encourage senior management personnel to stay, that includes establishing a mentoring program.
* Active recruitment and selection aimed specifically at women pilots and initiatives for women to join pilot training programs.
* Annual review of OH&S situations involving staffing levels on flights, possible staff retraining, job-sharing options to increase staff numbers without increasing costs, and the implementation of team-bonding, morale raising initiatives.
Finally, the continual
References: Christensen, C. 7 Raynor, M. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 67-84 ------------------------------------------------- Goddard, J. (2001). Beyond the High Performance paradigm? An analysis of Variation in Canadian Managerial Perceptions of Reform Programme Effectiveness. British Journal of Industrial Relations 39(1), 25-52 ------------------------------------------------- Forno,W. (2010). Hundreds Injured: Qantas Unsafe Staffing Levels. Retrieved January 27, 2011, from http://www.nswtwu.org/twu_news/HUNDREDS_INJURED_QANTAS_UNSAFE_STAFFING_LEVELS.shtml Hartel, C Janda, M. (2010), Qantas cuts costs to stay in profit. Retrieved February 5, 2011, from http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/08/12/2980701.htm?section=business O’Sullivan, M Qantas (2010a). Fact Files. Retrieved January 27, 2011, from http://www.qantas.com.au/infodetail/about/FactFiles.pdf Qantas (2010b) Rasch, E., (2003). Guidelines for management and leadership decisions. Management Decision, 41(10), 979-988. Razouk, A., Bayad, M. & Wannenmacher, D. (2009) Strategic Human Resource management and tacit knowledge transfer: A case study. Human Systems Management, 28(1/2), 77-82. Shen, J., Chanda, A., D’Netto, B. & Monga M. (2009). Managing diversity through human resource management: an international perspective and conceptual framework. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(2), 235–251. Ward, S. & Wooler, I. (2011) Keeping knowledge flowing in a downturn: Actions for knowledge and information managers. Business Information Review, 27(4), 253 – 262.