Preview

The Toulmin Argument: Chapter 6 Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
377 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Toulmin Argument: Chapter 6 Analysis
Chapter 6 Structuring Arguments Structured designs or arguments can attract a greater range of attention by playing close attention to their intended topic. Throughout history many beautifully structured arguments such as a speech or a certain subject in democracy has brought about the nations patriotic proclamation to demonstrate a country of free speech and democracy. The Toulmin Argument was introduced by a man by the name of Stephen Toulmin a British philosopher who thought to research the idea and method that describes the way people make such convincing arguments. Toulims’ argument takes into account situations in which people have to deal with throughout their lives with words such as sometimes, often, and almost which deal with

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    I find the Toulmin method helpful in explaining and breaking down what a good argument looks like. It’s a purely logical method of making a claim based upon opinion but using facts warrants and backing to support the initial claim. I’ve noticed this argument model being used in news channels, economic debates, and some medical fields. When I applied this to my chosen major of biomedical engineering, I noticed that the Toulmin method is used quite often in lower scale research projects. Regarding small projects like minor adjustments for a new model of a stethoscope, this model can be used to defend the engineer that believes that the chosen stethoscope can be upscaled. When it comes to medical supplies and gadgets every project or researched…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The General Argument made by Robert E. Shalhope in The Constitution and the Competing Political Cultures of Late-Eighteenth-Century America is that leading up to the 1787 Constitutional Convention there was political tension between the Federalist and Antifederalist about how the country would be governed. More Specifically, Shalhope argues that the Federalist thought that educated people should run the government and that the central government should have more power. While the Anti Federalists argued that the common people should be elected into the government, wealth should be widespread amongst the population, and that the state government should have more powers. The Federalists were mainly wealthy merchants and upper class men who have…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Argument, according to most authorities, gives primary importance to logical appeals; however, a writer or speaker must take into account the audience’s emotional response to the subject and the way it is presented. Success in convincing the audience depends on the writer’s trustworthiness.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In conclusion, Deborah Tannen balanced all three rhetorical appeals effectively to convince her audience. The author mostly used logos in her essay to back up her points. It was effective because she showed information and facts and demonstrated the audience could trust her. Tannen establishes credibility of her sources in her article by referencing facts, quotes, and people.…

    • 58 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the philosopher’s view: The Toulmin Model has four parts to an argument: the first is “the claim”, which is your thesis or the purpose of what you are disputing. The second is “the grounds”; which is leaving no uncertainty to the meaning and reasoning of your claim. The third is “the warrant”, which ties the purpose of the claim and the grounds together. Finally “the backing” which is theory of reasoning that may be needed to influence the audience if the warrant is not accepted. The Toulmin method is an outline of how to state your arguments in more of an analytical way. It allows you to break down the argument in different part so we can make a conclusion on how well the different part work together, as well as an effective way to get to the how and the why.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetoric is the study and practice of how we shape knowledge, which is complicated by the multiple ways we can interpret a text. Is used to study the purpose of a text and can be viewed as performance art where writers persuade readers to take action. Rhetoric is viewed as a form of communication that is situated, motivated, interactional and epistemic. This form of discourse known as rhetoric is both the art of human interaction (including persuasion) through language and other symbols, as well as the study of that interaction. “The major elements of rhetorical theory are the rhetorical situation, the audience, the pisteis or “proofs” (and their subdivisions), and the five canons of rhetoric: invention, arrangement, style, memory and delivery”. (Covino and Joliffe, p.332). Moreover, according to Bitzer, a situation is rhetorical when three elements are present: an exigence, an audience, and rhetorical constraints. An exigence is a need, a gap, something wanting, that can be met, filled in, or supplied only by a spoken or written text (Covino and Jolliffe, p.332), it is considered as the heart of the rhetorical situation. The purpose of this essay is to analyze two rhetorical situations to determine if they are effective or not according to the criteria of rhetoric. The rhetorical situations are President Franklin D. Roosevelt's speech "Pearl Harbor Address to the Nation" and Coca-Cola’s famous polar bear commercial: “Say Thank you with a Coke”.…

    • 1575 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What Is A Toulmin Model

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Page

    The information in the material shows of how a Toulmin model is used to analyze as well to create an argument outline. In this process the Toulmin model separates the components of an argument into pieces and analyze further more. It is composed of six points; the first point is the claim which is the main idea the essay. Secondly, we have the data where the writer use evidences to support its claim. Thirdly, is the warrant that connects the claim with the data. Fourthly, we have the backing which allows to support the warrant that becomes acceptable by the audience. Fifthly, we have the Rebuttals that states which is wrong or right of the argument from different points of view. Finally, we have the qualifiers which is a phrase that changes…

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I completely agree with you when you mentioned how people do not utilize a Toulmin argument as much because a lot of people do not have strong opinions on topics anymore or at least they do not express it. When I was making my response to this prompt and had to find an example of where people use the Toulmin argument format I had some trouble. Your explanation helped to answer my problem.…

    • 75 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This argument knows its audience well and succeeds in reaching it. It keeps its points brief and informally worded; it explains to the presumably uninformed; and it utilizes ethos and logos to educate an audience that wants to be educated, then leaves them with a piece of new information to ponder and carry with…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aristotle, although having lived thousands of years ago, continues to make an impact in our society with his contribution to Western thinking and his famous "art" of rhetoric. He remains to this day, one of the most influential philosophers in the history of rhetorical study. One of his most prominent works is his "Rhetoric", a book that "confronts scholars with several perplexing questions" (Herrick 74). "Rhetoric" is divided into three books that discuss the "domains of rhetoric, the rhetorical proofs that Aristotle is so famous for and matters of style and arrangement" (Herrick 74). One of the most important contributions of Aristotle 's "Rhetoric" is his idea of artistic proofs, which are used to persuade an audience. Since developed in the fourth century BC, these proofs still continue to be utilized by rhetoricians to this day through the Aristotelian method. There are three components that comprise the artistic proofs. These are "(1) logical reasoning (logos), (2) the names and causes of various human emotions (pathos), and (3) human character and goodness (ethos)" (Herrick 82). Although all parts of his work are instrumental to rhetoricians and scholars everywhere, I will focus on the profound impact of Aristotle 's "artistic proofs" to the art of rhetoric and use Franklin D. Roosevelt 's December 8, 1941 "Declaration of War" speech as an example of how they 're put into practice as a persuasive mechanism in today 's postmodern society.…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    EN1420 Toulmins Paper

    • 311 Words
    • 1 Page

    This article is about the kids video Baby Einstein. Disney came out with this video claiming if you had your child watch this video; your child will become smarter on their own. While it all sounded amazing to any parent, it just simply was not true. It was actually proven that early television exposure ended up causing later problems with a child's attention span.…

    • 311 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jesse Roach Stidham Eng 112-4144 Toulmin Argument Essay October 8, 2014 The Inevitable Future It is hard to argue the fact that our future will see technological advances that will shape and change the way people go about their lives. Although change is imminent, it is unknown exactly how and to what degree these changes will impact society as a whole.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In chapter one, “Open Your Eyes,” Heinrichs states that argument is an important social element that surrounds everyday life. People who uses rhetoric, the art of argument, tends to succeed in persuading others to do their bidding. Many powerful politicians today mastered this tool. The most toughest arguments can be won with this art. Rhetoric has helped mankind develop complex societies, codes, and laws. “Every one of America’s founders studied rhetoric, and they used its principles in writing the Constitution (4)”. An example of someone using rhetoric effectively is a U.S. president attempting to persuade the citizens to vote for him. The president’s goal is to “manipulate” or “seduce” the voters into thinking that voting for him may be the best choice for the country. This may lead to a consensus about who will be the leader of America. To win the election, however, the candidates must persuade the people with an elaborate speech. The best speeches tends to have rhetorical devices. Former President John F. Kennedy was very good at speeches since he used rhetoric effectively by using devices such as chiasmus.…

    • 6624 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The rhetorical appeal that was mainly used in this article is logos, which convinces the…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Different styles of arguments can shape our past, present, and future. They represent our life styles and major influences that are in gained from being and ending of our lives. They are only a small part, but show a huge part of our charters.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays