Preview

Summary Of The General Argument By Robert Shalhope

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
361 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of The General Argument By Robert Shalhope
The General Argument made by Robert E. Shalhope in The Constitution and the Competing Political Cultures of Late-Eighteenth-Century America is that leading up to the 1787 Constitutional Convention there was political tension between the Federalist and Antifederalist about how the country would be governed. More Specifically, Shalhope argues that the Federalist thought that educated people should run the government and that the central government should have more power. While the Anti Federalists argued that the common people should be elected into the government, wealth should be widespread amongst the population, and that the state government should have more powers. The Federalists were mainly wealthy merchants and upper class men who have

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Federalists believed that a strong central government was needed because of the cruel remarks that were made against America in European courts. (Doc. 1) These remarks led the…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “A Revolution In Favor Of Government”, by Max M. Edling, presents the founding period of America. Besides, it focuses on the political and historical facts of the Constitution and the American state. According to Max Edling, the Federalists tried to build a central government, which was based on the fiscal-military of Europe. So, the federal system of government was built when the Constitution was designed by Federalists with fiscal-military power. They had to build a different state, because it was hard to secure adopting the Constitution. The Constitution was designed to protect the liberties and the rights of the American citizens.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Before the state convention, there is a great issue about liberty. One proponents of the Constitution are federalists who favor to establish a stronger national government; one opponents of the Constitution are anti-federalists who favor to establish a weaker national government. Federalists think only a stronger national government have an ability to keep the states in control. Anti-federalists think the states should have more power than the national government. Even though the conflict between federalist and anti-federalist doesn't stop, whether it is a federalists or anti-federalists, they have the same dream to united the states to become a strong country. The perfect decision is to use the best way to administrate the country and stabilize the society. In my opinion, a stronger national government will keep the country developing.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    U.S Constitution DBQ

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Federal Government showed to be ineffective under the Articles of Confederation. The Government lacked power, with large state governments showing to be superior. The U.S Constitution proposed a new form of government. With the addition of three separate branches of government, being, legislative, executive, and judicial, the Constitution also created a stronger Federal Government, weakening state governments. As southern states with larger populations were against the ratification of the Constitution, northern states consisting of fewer, more wealthy people, supported it. Federalists and Antifederalists took sides, prompting debate over a solution to the issue. The writings of the U.S Constitution produced major concerns at the center of the Constitutional Convention as the future of America had to be written.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine seeing an average West Valley student that uses his phone and watches television in moderation and completes his homework. Now meet Quinton Schafer, a self proclaimedself-proclaimed screen abuser. Schafer confessed to using his computer for several hours a week on a school night. His screen time doubles on weekends to about twelve hours. Since he attends West Valley High School he must also juggle school work and his athletics. The result is that he is unable to do all of this and must sacrifice time to pursue his computer habits. Not only will they consume precious time, but they do much worse. Screens are obviously not beneficial for students so encouraging students to participate in “shutdown your screen week”.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The federalists were mostly developed by high-class wealthy merchants, bankers, manufactures or professional men from New England and the Atlantic Seaboard, along with farmers and Southern planters. They admired the English aristocracy. Federalists considered the common people ignorant and incapable of self-government. They desired high voting qualifications claiming that unfettered democracy was anarchy. They favored a broad interpretation of the constitution to strengthen the central government at the expense of the state’s rights and wanted an expanding bureaucracy.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton, the leader of the Federalists, and his party believed in a loose interpretation of the Constitution. This means they think that certain powers not specifically given to the federal government was more or less implied. Hamilton says “The people are turbulent and changing; they seldom judge or determine right.” He and the Federalists think the government needs more control to run its…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Though both the Anti-Federalist and Federalist Constitution makers were aristocratic and wanted a government removed from the masses, their political philosophies differed greatly. Jefferson’s thinking was very progressive for his time in…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With many different views on how to run the government, it was hard to depict which parties’ group would be the strongest and the best fit to control the country: the Federalists’ or the Democratic-Republicans. The Federalists’ wanted a very strong government to bring together the bickering states. On the other hand, the Democratic-Republicans pictured more independent state governments to rule the people. Although they didn’t agree on many things they did have one idea in common, such as, both parties wanted to follow the Constitution, but in different ways.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The debates over ratification of the Constitution represent the most important and intellectually sophisticated public debates in American history. On the one side, the supporters of the Constitution, or "Federalists," argued that the nation desperately needed a stronger national government to bring order, stability and unity to its efforts to find its way in an increasingly complicated world. Opponents of the Constitution, or "Antifederalists," countered that the the governments of the states were strong enough to realize the objectives of each state. Any government that diminished the power of the states, as the new Constitution surely promised to do, would also diminish the ability of each state to meet the needs of its citizens. More dramatically, the Antifederalists argued that the new national government, far removed from the people, would be all to quick to compromise their rights and liberties in the name of establishing order and unity.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John F. Kennedy once exclaimed, “Every American who ever lived, with the exception of one group, was either an immigrant himself or a descendant of immigrants(A Nation Of Immigrants page 3)." John was known for his irish-catholic heritage, and he served as one of our most beloved presidents. John A. Treutlen was the first naturalized citizen governor. Treutlen’s parents were raised with British ideals. When Treutlen went off to America to make something of himself, his parents called him worthless (D). However, he rose above his heritage to bring great ideas to American policies. Treutlen wasn’t the only citizen considered worthless. In fact many immigrants feel like this when they come to America. They want to prove to their families (and themselves) that…

    • 1595 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Though Rosenau missed and left out many critical points in his chapter, he did successful interpret many shifts. Primarily, his understanding that power is shifting away from the state, and towards the individual is an undeniable truth. Like Rosenau, Zacher made a similar statement that in the decline of the Westphalian system of states, power is shifting away from the state and towards cities and corporations. Many cities and corporations, like Los Angeles and Walmart, are larger than certain countries around the world, so this power shift is not surprising. Rosenau’s argument that citizens can gain power by coming together holds weight, especially considering that a group of citizens in cities such as Los Angeles might have more power than…

    • 180 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    After the American Revolutionary war, the budding country was deeply in debt. People had different ideas on how to pay off this debt, later leading to the formation of political parties. The Federalist Party was formed and they believed that it was in the new country’s best interest to have a strong centralized…

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A collection of essays called, The Federalist, were published in 1787 and 1788 and basically supported the ratification of the constitution and the idea of a national authority without the fear of tyranny in the new government. The anti-federalists responded to this with what they considered to be the dangers of a more powerful central government.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the heels of the revolutionary war and the failed attempt of a national government (The Articles of Confederation), the leaders of the United States set to make a stronger, centralized government, with dual sovereignty between the national government and the states. The rules of this governing body would be laid out in a document called the Constitution. Although most leaders supported the constitution they did not agree on many aspects of it. Out of the disagreement two groups emerged, the Federalist and the Anti-Federalist. The Federalist supported all aspects of the constitution and a larger national government, while the Anti-Federalist opposed ratifying the constitution and supported a smaller national government and more sovereignty to the states. This disagreement led to a fierce debate between the two groups that still resonates today. This essay will examine the primary…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays