Firstly, the straightforward word choice is appropriate for its audience. The readership of The New Yorker is made up of mostly non-economist laymen, and economic jargon would make the argument inaccessible to them. The structure, specifically the length, of the article is also effective. With the advent of the Internet, attention spans have grown shorter, with the younger generation preferring brief and …show more content…
The audience, mostly socially liberals, are those who wish to be more politically active and informed. They want to hear what they can do to fix an issue from a source that is equally passionate about the topic. The tone is appropriately rousing, providing a course of action along with its ethos- and logos-driven information. In addition, the article was published when readers would be most susceptible, having acquired some information on the topic from the news, but still lacking the knowledge to have informed opinions or act. Accordingly, the readers learn more about the issue, see that the solution will be complicated, and are satisfied having obtained the information to act.
This argument knows its audience well and succeeds in reaching it. It keeps its points brief and informally worded; it explains to the presumably uninformed; and it utilizes ethos and logos to educate an audience that wants to be educated, then leaves them with a piece of new information to ponder and carry with