Preview

The Pepsico Company: the Quaker Oats Acquisition

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1759 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Pepsico Company: the Quaker Oats Acquisition
Company Overview
By the end of 1999, following a multi-year restricting effort, PepsiCo had once again become one of the most successful consumer products companies in the world. In less than four years, it had achieved am 80% increase in net income, on 30% lower sales, and with 75% fewer employees. PepsiCo’s major subsidiaries were the Pepsi-Cola Company, which was the world’s largest manufacturer and distributor of snack chips, and Tropicana Products, the largest marketer of branded juices.
Throughout 1999, PepsiCo was closely tracking several potential strategic acquisitions. In the fall of 2000, it appeared that the right moment for an equity-financed acquisition had arrived. At this time, PepsiCo management decided to initiate confidential discussion with The Quaker Oats Company about a potential business combination. Gatorade, a key brand in Quaker’s portfolio, had long been on PepsiCo’s wish list.
On October 5, 2000, an investment-banking team from Merrill Lynch met with the top executives of PepsiCo to discuss a possible business combination between PepsiCo and Quaker. The goals of the meeting were:
• To assess the value of Quaker’s businesses;
• To estimate potential synergies associated with a Pepsi-Quaker merger; and
• To come up with an effective negotiation strategy.
PepsiCo executives were confident that Quaker’s beverage and snack food business could contribute to Pepsi’s profitable growth in convenience foods and beverages. However, PepsiCo’s managers, led by CEO Roger Enrico and CFO Indra Nooyi, were committed to upholding the value of PepsiCo shares, and as a result, they were determined not to pay too much for Quaker.
PepsiCo’s Origin and History
In the summer of 1898 Caleb D. Bradham, a young man pharmacist from North Carolina, looked for a name that would better describe the “Brad’s Drink,” his concoction of carbonated water, sugar, vanilla and kola nuts. He decided to buy the name “Pep Kola” from the local competitor, which he later changed to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Xacc280 Financial Analysis

    • 1828 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Coca-Cola company has been in business since its inventor began selling it in drug stores in 1886 (The Coca-Cola Company, 2009). Pepsi-Cola was invented a short time later in 1898, but at the time it was called “Brad’s drink.” It was later renamed Pepsi-Cola in 1902 (Butler, 2006). Since those early days when the sodas were invented, Coca-Cola and Pepsi have been in competition with each other for the domination of the world’s soda market. Over the course of more than a century, sales have continued to rise for both companies, and they both consistently earn a profit. Both companies have expanded into new product markets in more recent years. They have chosen to invest their earnings in new ventures like bottled water, snack foods, and iced tea, and they each strive to continue increasing their profits in many ways. In order to maintain this continued growth in the coming years, these companies are both in need of investors who will fund their efforts.…

    • 1828 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Environmental Factors

    • 1140 Words
    • 4 Pages

    PepsiCo is a large company that conducts both domestic and global marketing and is very well known. One of the main products and one that I use everyday is Pepsi. PepsiCo also produces Quaker Oats, Lays chips, Gatorade, and Tropicana orange juice.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fin/370 Pepsico Essay

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Pepsi like many companies needs to grow to continue to make money. This is a broad statement and works the same for every business operating in any market. Pepsi has recognized this need and has come up with a few initiatives to make this happen. Pepsi decided that the best way to make their company stronger was to build up their current brands and make their distribution practices more streamline and economic. Pepsi has dedicated more than $500 million dollars for this purpose and plans to continue to report positive growth because of this initiative. The plan is to increase the marketing in North America and make the already iconic beverages more of a household name. The thinking behind this is that if the products are in the consumers face, they will be more likely to purchase the products Pepsi offers ensuring positive growth for the shareholders. Although Pepsi has decided to back the most known brands, Pepsi will still continue to bring new snacks and beverages to the market because different factors affect the consumption of the already strong branded products. Because upper level management knows that consumer wants and tastes play a large role in how the public buys snacks, Pepsi has committed to make changes to respond to customer wants and changing tastes in different areas.…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Through this paper Pepsi and Coca Cola will be fully evaluated. A stock market analysis will be presented to a client as part of a professional consultation process. A background of both Pepsi and Coca will be accompanied in order to have a full synopsis of each company. The stock trends will be examined for both investment options. The stock trends will be based from the intial public offering day to January 2, 2012. Current events surrounding both companies will be displayed in order to assist the analysis. Lastly, we will analyze the financial statements of both companies. After a complete review of both companies a recommendation will be made as the better investment opportunity for the client.…

    • 3170 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pepsi-Cola began as a drink developed by a pharmacist named Caleb Bradham in his drugstore in 1893. The soft drink was made to be a tonic to aid in digestion and as a refreshing drink that gives an energy boost. This concoction made of pepsin and kola nuts was originally called “Brad’s Drink” named after its inventor, but was later changed to Pepsi-Cola to be more marketable. Originally, this beverage was sold in drug stores and at soda fountains, but was later sold in bottled form to facilitate mass distribution. The Great Depression was a major setback for many American companies and there was no exception for Pepsi. However, the company strived to remain strong and offered its product for five cents in the mid thirties while touting that their product offered twice as much for half the price of Coke’s product. During this time their ad campaigns and marketing tactics worked and their company continued to remain profitable despite a harsh economic climate. Pepsi marketed its products to virtually everyone, young and old, but they often utilized creative marketing tactics to entice new customers to try their products. In the mid 1940’s Pepsi began a marketing campaign to gain more popularity with African American customers whom the company decided where not getting adequate attention with regards to marketing and advertising. PepsiCo today now has interests in many different brands and product lines. Some of their most notable brands familiar to consumers today are Pepsi-Cola, Frito-Lays, SoBe, Tostitos, Sabra, Near East, Pasta Roni, Sun Chips, Cheetos, Quaker, Doritos, Sierra Mist, and Dole to name a few. There is an even more diverse product portfolio that includes products marketed to international consumers to suit their individual tastes. The major suppliers for Pepsi-Cola Company include packaging…

    • 2254 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    candy businesses. Quaker thought it could create a Snapple/Gatorade combination and planned to exploit the synergies resulting from such combination while improving the efficiency of operations.They wanted to achieve economies of scale by unifying the manufacturing and distribution of Snapple and Gatorade.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are a vast amount of manufacturers and distributors in this market, but Pepsi and Coca-Cola have managed to stay in the number one spot for a couple of decades. These two companies have not only dominated the market domestically they have dominated the worldwide market. They followed a plan that kept them above and beyond the market of soft drinks. They have overcome obstacles that allowed them to manufacture and distribute globally. (The Coca Cola Company, 2009).…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Quaker CEO William D. Smithburg had bought Stokely-Van Camp in 1983, mainly for its Gatorade, then a $90 million sports drink. Even though he drew criticism, Smithburg turned Gatorade into a billion dollar brand. Quaker Oats bought Snapple in 1993 for an extravagant $1.7 billion dollars even though industry leaders thought it was only worth $700 million. Smithburg 's strategy was to use the strength of Snapple 's distributors in the cold channel to help Gatorade and use Gatorade 's strength in the supermarkets to help Snapple. Quaker executives hoped that Snapple would provide the same type of benefits as their highly successful Gatorade brand had done in previous years. They expected to achieve these benefits by applying the marketing expertise used for Gatorade, but they failed to understand some important differences in the markets, distribution channels, and customer attitudes for the two types of beverages. The Quaker…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The purpose of this paper is to provide a financial analysis comparison between PepsiCo and the Coca-Cola Cooperation. Many companies are forever finding ways to improve market value to increase sales, and income. Consumers will always look for deals or special buys to not only save them money but also, give them better quality. Companies are always looking for ways to make profits when marketing their products. This paper analyzes the financial statements of the two leaders in the soft drink industry. Looking at the Consolidated Statements of Income and the Balance Sheets of both companies, one might determine which would be the better company to invest their money. One of these companies has a greater increase in sales, profit gain, net cash, and income than the other one. Using calculations of Ratios, Horizontal Analysis and Vertical Analysis will show why one company would be the better choice in investing than the other.…

    • 1990 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PepsiCo, Inc. and The Coca Cola Company have both been in production for ages. Both PepsiCo, Inc. and The Coca Cola Company have become common house hold names through out the world today. Pepsi is one of the best selling products in American history. “Pepsi is the number 2 soft drink company producer, the world over. Pepsi’s number one priority is making sure that their shareholders investments are profitable. Pepsi has been able to achieve this goal for the most part via increased sales, keeping cost low, and spending money wisely. Pepsi takes pride in the name, they have built an excellent brand by deliver a product that is satisfying to the consumer, as well as safe. The investors in the company also can be happy with the return of investment”(investorguide.com). “The Coca Cola Company is likely, one of the most significant brands in American history. Coke can go in a category with a company like McDonalds when it comes to brand value, these two trademarks are 2 of the most recognized in the world. Coke is the highest seller of soft drinks, moving 1.3 billion beverages that are served daily”(investorguide.com). Pepsi and Coke have been mass producing soft-drinks on an assembly line for a very long time and they both have been competing for the number one soft drink seller spot. PepsiCo, Inc and The Coca Cola Company targets all income segments of customers in the entire world as their products are high quality and very recognizable.…

    • 1827 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Financial Analysis

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The PepsiCo, Inc.(PEP) was founded in 1965 and is a global food, snack and beverage company that encompasses over 22 brands within Pepsi Cola, Lay’s, Gatorade, Tropicana and Quaker Oats and are a vital player in the beverages and foods industry. Their primary sector is based on consumer goods and the company employs approximately 297,000 people and $60B in revenue. Currently, the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of PepsiCo is Indra K. Nooyi and its headquarters is located in Purchase, NY. On 19 Oct 2012 PepsiCo closed at $69.88 which went down -0.88 (-1.24%) from the day before. The companies P/E ratio was 18.63 and a D/Y of 3.04. Sales for PepsiCo have continuously increased each year over the last 3 years after a drop in 2008. The stocks for PepsiCo have steadily climbed consistently since April with a recent dip in September and October but nothing extremely significant.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cadbury Schweppes Case Study

    • 12635 Words
    • 51 Pages

    In late October 2002, Sir John Sunderland, chairman and CEO of Cadbury Schweppes, contemplated the future of his global confectionery and beverage company. Over the previous decade, the company had made several acquisitions to complement its portfolio of chocolate, soft drinks, sugar confectionery (candy), and gum. Now it was considering a bid for Adams, the number two player in the worldwide gum business and, with its Halls brand, a leader in sugar confectionery. After researching the acquisition for many months, his Chief Strategy Officer Todd Stitzer and the Adams deal team were approaching the point of no return. Sunderland knew that they would have to bid more than $4 billion to have any chance of winning Adams. Should they go ahead with the offer and if so, was all debt financing of the bid appropriate? At this lofty price, how certain could the Cadbury Schweppes’ team be that they could create value? He wondered, was the strategy behind the acquisition sound, and could the leadership team successfully execute an acquisition and integration plan of this magnitude? (Exhibits 1, 1a, and 2).…

    • 12635 Words
    • 51 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It seems that thus far PepsiCo’strategy is a success; however they still have some opportunities…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Further, they tried to rationalize distributions of both Snapple and Gatorade and negotiate deals with distributors and distributor councils which were unsuccessful. Quaker already had a successful distribution…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Coke vs. Pepsi

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Wall Street Journal (2010). Who Does it Better. Retrieved on June 10, 2011 from Website:…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics