Preview

The Kansas-Nebraska Act

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
413 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Kansas-Nebraska Act
The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 was a controversial legislation that opened Kansas and Nebraska to white settlement, repealed the Compromise of 1850, and led opponents to form the Republican party. This piece of legislation was introduced in Congress that revived the issues of the expansion of slavery. The Compromise of 1850 was a series of measures passed by Congress to resolve sectional tensions. Congress admitted California to the Union as a free state. And organize the territories of New Mexico, Nevada, Arizona, and Utah without mention of slavery. It also paid Texan $10 million to relinquish land claims in New Mexico and abolished the slave trade in the District of Columbia (but not slavery) while enacted a law requiring the return of fugitive slaves. (Martin 369)Douglas who pushed the Compromise of 1850, and then stated he “would never make a speech of slavery again” also proposed that the area west of Iowa and Missouri (which was set aside as permanent Indian reservation) be organized as the Nebraska territory to white settlers. Since Nebraska was located in the northern half of the …show more content…
Economically farmers agitated for new land, and a rail route through a northern route was being promoted.(Martin 374) Politically there was a northern fury to the Kansas-Nebraska Act. The Kansas-Nebraska Act brought about a dramatic realignment of the two party system. Whigs abandoned their party and joined the Democrats, while northern Democrats repudiated their own elected reps. (Martin 374) The Republican Party benefited from those defections and was a new political organization. It contained antislavery radicals, moderate and conservative Free Soilers, old-line Whigs, former Jackson Democrats, nativists, and anti-slavery immigrants. With the Republican slogan “Free labor, free, soil, free men”, the rose as a consequence of the Kansas-Nebraska

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Caning of Charles Sumnner

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages

    destroying the efforts of slave owners to take over the federal government and ensure the survival of slavery. Three days prior to Mr. Brooks’ visit, Mr. Sumner had delivered a speech in response to the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act, a bill written by two proslavery southern senators, Andrew Butler and Stephen Douglass. Both Andrew Butler and Stephen Douglass were southern democrats who defended slavery. The passage of the Kansas-Nebraska act enraged Senators and Congressman from the northern part of the Union because it allowed both the Kansa and Nebraska territories to vote whether to enter the Union as…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    But, many of the northern senators were hesitant to allow Missouri to become a slave state because there were already 11 free states and 11 slave states and the northern senators did not want too much representation from slave state senators. Also, Missouri was the the west of the Mississippi and Ohio rivers so it was not required to follow the Northwest Ordinance Act leading to the confusion of whether it was a slave state or a free state. The northern senators argued that slavery was an immoral sin and should be abolished while the southern senators argued that slavery was justified in the constitution and that they had the right to keep slaves if they wanted to. To keep a balance of pro-slavery senators and free-state senators, Henry Clay proposed the Missouri Compromise which stated that Missouri would be a slave state if Maine was accepted as a free state. It further drew the 36-30 parallel to create a division for which states would be free and which would be slave-owning.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kansas Nebraska Act Dbq

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Kansas- Nebraska Act was proposed by Stephen Douglas in 1854. This Act stated that the territory of Nebraska would be split into two separate territories, Nebraska and Kansas. It also stated the people could vote on whether the territories would have slavery. This Act caused a large controversy between the people in the North and the South of the United States.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He negotiated the Act that opened Kansas and Nebraska territories for settlement. It also advocated for territorial legislatures to have the power to decide on all slavery issues (Carnes & Garraty, 2012, p.354). The Act repealed the Missouri Compromise. Northern states vehemently opposed the Act as it led to an increase in the locality of slavery. In passing the law, the nation took the greatest single step in its march towards the abyss of civil war.…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When the Mexican War ended, America was ceded western territories. This caused a problem on whether these new territories would be admitted as slave states or free states. To deal with this, Congress passed the Compromise of 1850 which basically made California free and allowed the people to pick in Utah and New Mexico. The ability of a state to decide whether it would allow slavery or not was called popular sovereignty.…

    • 537 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another issue in the Civil War that revolved around land was the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. This Bill was passed for great measure, not only did it solve many political unknowns, but it also solved many things for the future. The Kansas Nebraska Act was enacted for “Popular Sovereignty” which means people rule, or something chosen by the government reflected by the citizens. This not only was important in the land matter, but also has connections to states rights and also the 10th Amendment. The Act let the settlers choose rather they wanted their state to be slavery or non-slavery. This caused many conflicts between the north and the south, due to the uneven amount of states wanting to be able to have slaves or to not have slaves. Not only…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Of all the events that happened in the US before 1877, the one event that completely changed the course of history was the direct result of the Kansas Nebraska act i.e. Bleeding Kansas. The Kansas Nebraska act allowed for new territories to decide if they were a free or a slave sate by popular sovereignty. It undid the compromise that was made in Missouri compromise, which designated a line of latitude to be the separation of free and slave states. The Kansas Nebraska act re ignited the differences between pro and anti-slavery sections. Violent events and fighting had become so terrible that it had to be termed as “Bleeding Kansas”.…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kansas & Nebraska Act

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Kansas and Nebraska Act was introduced in 1854 by Senator Stephen A. Douglas. Douglas was a Democrat well liked in the South. He didn’t really care too much about slavery because he was looking toward the development of the new Western country between the Missouri River and California. Specifically, he wanted a transcontinental railroad that went through Chicago, which was his home town. Building this road would involve grants of public land. The south, on the other hand, wanted it to go to the Pacific coast by way of Texas and New Mexico. In order to get southern support he decided to make a bill to create the territories of Kansas and Nebraska.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Bleeding Kansas

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Kansas Territory became the center of attention in the battle between North and South over expanding slavery into the territories. Those southerners who voted for the Kansas-Nebraska Act (splitting the territory into two areas) assumed that Kansas would enter the union as a slave state. The Republican Party, however, wanted to repeal the Kansas-Nebraska Act and restore the provision in the Missouri Compromise that prohibited…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It made it so that slavery was banned in states above the southern border of Missouri. For just over 30 years, it remained enforced before the Kansas-Nebraska Act became law on May 30, 1854. It established two new states and allowed the population to decide whether or not the territory would be a free or slave state. Following the creation of the territories, activists who supported and opposed slavery began clashing over how the vote should be cast. However, before the law was even formally passed, those who were adamantly opposed to slavery founded the Republican Party.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the years of 1846 to 1848, America and Mexico were in war due to conflicts regarding slavery and territories. Henry Clay (the Secretary of State at that time) tried to end the war by introducing a series of bills called The Compromise of 1850. The Compromise had five laws that were put in place to help the Northern Free States and the Southern Slave States come to a natural balance. In September 9, 1850, the government passed three of the laws from the Compromise of 1850. The first three bills were regarding territory between New Mexico and Utah, in addition to adding California to the Union. Then on September 18, 1950, the government passed the fourth bill which was regarding fugitives and slaves. The fifth law was introduced on September 20, 1850, this bill was regarding abolition of slave trade from Columbia.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sample Dbq

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages

    He was a significant force behind the Compromise of 1850 and the Kansas-Nebraska Act; both which included the idea of "popular sovereignty." Douglas was a strong believer in this doctrine, which said that the people of the territories should choose whether they wanted slavery or not. On the other side was Abraham Lincoln; a Republican who was unknown nationally until these debates. Lincoln was opposed to the expansion of slavery; he believed it should be restricted and not permitted in the new territories. He felt slavery was morally incorrect, and in his "house-divided" speech explained that the union could not survive forever as half free and half slave. Lincoln hoped for a nation without slavery eventually. Their clear, clashing viewpoints on slavery caused it to be the main issue throughout the debates. The debates took place between August and October, 1858, in seven different cities in Illinois: Ottawa, Freeport, Jonesboro, Charleston, Galesburg, Quincy, and Alton.…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Douglas and The United States Congress. the Kansas-Nebraska Act allowed landowners with in Kansas and Nebraska to decide whether to allow slaves within their Land. The Kansas-Nebraska Act also was revoking the Missouri Compromise of 1820 which did not allow slavery within the northern side of the United States. Abraham Lincoln was anti-slavery in the north. He was also against the Kansas-Nebraska Act.…

    • 1823 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stephen Douglas

    • 562 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “In 1854, Senator Stephen Douglas of Illinois saw an opportunity to run for the presidency, and he wanted the support of southern Democrats. The Democratic Party was particularly in favor of states’ rights and believed states should get to decide for themselves the legality of slavery.” (American History - Part 1-The Nation Torn Apart (1844 – 1865). Douglas created the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which essentially stated that Kansas and Nebraska would vote on whether they become Slave States or not. The Act was passed by Congress, effectively repealing the Missouri Compromise of 1820. The Missouri Compromise stated that the latitude of 36° 30’ N…

    • 562 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    causes of civil war

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages

    New experimentations in government around the beginning period of the Civil War were being used. The Great Compromise of 1787 or Sherman's Compromise was an agreement that large and small states reached during the Constitutional Convention of 1787 that in part defined the legislative structure and representation that each state would have under the United States Constitution. It retained the bicameral legislature as proposed by Roger Sherman, along with proportional representation in the lower house, but required the upper house to be weighted equally between the states. Each state would have two representatives in the upper house. Another compromise was the Missouri compromise. The Missouri Compromise was passed in 1820 between the pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions in the United States Congress, involving primarily the regulation of slavery in the western territories. It prohibited slavery in the former Louisiana Territory north of the parallel 36°30′ north except within the boundaries of the proposed state of Missouri. The Missouri Compromise settled the question of slavery in the United States for many years. Its repeal would bring about conflict that would lead to the Civil War. In 1854 the Missouri Compromise was repealed as part of the Kansas-Nebraska Act. The Kansas-Nebraska Act allowed white male settlers in those territories to determine through popular sovereignty whether they would allow slavery within each territory. It became problematic when popular sovereignty was written into the proposal so that the voters of the moment would decide…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays