Preview

Kansas & Nebraska Act

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
407 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Kansas & Nebraska Act
The Kansas and Nebraska Act was introduced in 1854 by Senator Stephen A. Douglas. Douglas was a Democrat well liked in the South. He didn’t really care too much about slavery because he was looking toward the development of the new Western country between the Missouri River and California. Specifically, he wanted a transcontinental railroad that went through Chicago, which was his home town. Building this road would involve grants of public land. The south, on the other hand, wanted it to go to the Pacific coast by way of Texas and New Mexico. In order to get southern support he decided to make a bill to create the territories of Kansas and Nebraska.
In the bill he proposed popular sovereignty, which meant that each territory could choose between being a free state or a slave state. He also included repealing the Missouri Compromise which stated that: "Missouri could come into the union with Slavery, but that in all the remaining part of the territory purchased of France, which lies north of 36 degrees and 30 minutes north latitude, slavery should never be permitted". Democrats and Whigs fought for the chance of having a northern slave state. The North became enraged that the Missouri Compromise had been tampered with. This caused more tension between the North and South.
The Kansas-Nebraska act ended up being the demise of Whig and Democratic parties. The southern Whigs united with Southern Democrats against their northern counterparts for the first time in history. They were never able to reunite and the democrats survived, but northern democrats lost over half their seats in congress that year. Once the Act was passed, thousands of people moved into the territory. Missouri sent over its Border Ruffians who threatened people and casted illegal votes. New England sent rifles, known as Beecher’s Bibles, because Reverend Henry Ward Beecher had said, “There might be spots where a gun is more useful than a bible”.
By 1855, everything had gone downhill.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    After the Turner revolt, the topic of slavery took over American politics (3,91). Congressman David Wilmot suggested that legislation prohibit slavery in new territories that were conquered from the victory in a war with Mexico (3,91). Wilmot acted in hopes of stopping slavery's expansion westward but his movement did not pass with the Senate and was therefore disregarded (3,91). The South's population was slowly becoming overshadowed by the North's, leaving little room to stop anti-slavery legislation (3,91). When California was admitted as a free state in 1850, the US was left with no slave state to balance this addition and some southerners desired a separation of slave states from the union (3,92). Congressmen and senators started to fear their political opponents tremendously; tension was slowly building up (3,92). The Compromise of 1850 admitted California as a free state but also passed a law making it painless for slave-owners to recover their escaped slaves from free states (3,92). Congress then passed the Kansas-Nebraska Act which allowed inhabitants to…

    • 2634 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ch 1 Creating A Nation

    • 3953 Words
    • 23 Pages

    5. Anger over the Kansas-Nebraska Act resulted in a new political coalition that became the…

    • 3953 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    sample orr and ozark mo

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages

    During the elections of 1860, the United States was divided by decisions concerning slavery. The Missouri territory came to the United States as part of the 1803 Louisiana Purchase. The House of Representatives put forward an amendment to the admission of Missouri that would prohibit the introduction of slaves into Missouri and freeing the children of slaves at the age of 25. The Senate passed the bill admitting Missouri without the amendment, but it was rejected by the House, pushing the controversy into 1820. The Great Compromiser, Henry Clay, proposed the following elements of a sectional compromise: That Missouri be admitted to the Union as a slave state (as the population of the territory apparently desired).That slavery was to be prohibited from the new American territories in the Louisiana Purchase north of 36/30’ north latitude (the southern boundary of Missouri). States to the south of the line (the new Arkansas Territory) would decide the slavery issue for themselves. Missouri became the 24th state on August 10, 1821. The Missouri Compromise was canceled in 1854 with the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Chapter 13 Apush Assignment

    • 2422 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Kansas Nebraska Act- 1854 created the territories of Kansas and Nebraska, opened new lands, repealed the Missouri Compromise of 1820, and allowed settlers in those territories to determine if they would allow slavery within their boundaries…

    • 2422 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    While there had already been tension building between the North and the South, the addition of new territory added new fuel to the fire. If the new states that emerged from the Louisiana Territory were all free, then the balance of power in the U.S. Senate would tilt decisively against slavery or vice versa . From the moment that the expansion of the United States emerged, there was conflict. Eventually after many years of debate the Missouri Compromise came to be in 1820. The Missouri Compromise was devised by Henry Clay . It was an attempt to defuse the tension causes by the addition of the Louisiana Purchase. It gave the pre-slavers the decisive state they needed to hold their position in congress. After much debate was had about which states would be free or slave states with the addition of the Louisiana Purchase, a compromise was worked out. To appease both sides Missouri would be admitted as a slave state and Maine (which used to be apart Massachusetts) would have the status of a free state, and minus Missouri, slavery was to be excluded at a certain latitude . With the Missouri Compromise; all states south of Missouri would be slave states and all states north of it would be free. The addition of Missouri as a slave state just ignited the already hot debate about the legitimacy of slavery. While the Louisiana Purchase would eventually help to…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act was one of the sparks to the civil war. This Act allowed Kansas and Nebraska to become a territory in the United States. But there was a law called Popular Sovereignty. In these two new territories there were pro-slavery people and anti-slavery people. Popular Sovereignty stated that the people in the territories of Kansas and Nebraska could vote on whether or not there would be slavery in the territory. Now if you think about it there are people that are for slavery and people that are against slavery in the same territory voting on whether or not there should be slavery in that territory. Of course there was going to be some tension between all the people, and tension leads to fights and arguments. Fights and arguments lead to wars, civil wars!…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Kansas-Nebrask Act was an 1854 a bill that mandated "popular sovereignty" -giving settlers the choice to decide whether slavery would be allowed or not. Making each state a pro-slavery state or an anti-slavery state. The pro-slavery and anti-slavery states later caused huge peridos of viloence in the time line like the Bleeding Kansas, and was a major part in the reason the…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War inevitable

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Nevertheless, after seizing Mexico and the spreading of territories westward the South depended highly on slavery because of the "cotton king". One of these territories included the Kansas-Nebraska where many newcomers and the proslavery settlers began to move into the territory. In this territory after the 1852 election, the temporary peace of the Compromise of 1850 came to an end. Senator Stephen Douglas passes the Kansas-Nebraska Act which created two new territories of Kansas and Nebraska. The status of slavery in the area was decided to be by popular sovereignty. This act wrecked two compromises The Compromise of 1820, and 1850, and the democratic party. While the act formed a new party: the Republicans.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bleeding Kansas

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 set the scene by allowing the new territories of Kansas and Nebraska to decide by popular sovereignty, an idea advocated by US Senator Stephan A. Douglas, if they would be free or slave states. The government assumed that few slave owners would attempt to settle in Kansas and make it a slave state, because it was thought to be too far north for profitable exploitation of slaves. Instead, it resulted in immigration to Kansas by activists from both sides, which began the bloody wars of slavery which lasted from 1854 to 1858.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, the Missouri Compromise of 1820 established the slavery line that allowed slavery below it and forbid slavery above it. It also gave the South another slave state in Missouri and the north a free state in Maine. Although each region gained a state in the Senate, the south benefited most from the acquisition because Missouri was in such a pivotal position in the country, right on the border. Later on with the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854, Missouri had a big role in getting Kansas to vote south because many proslavery Missourians crossed the border into Kansas to vote slavery. The Missouri Compromise also helped slavery because the line that was formed to limit slavery had more land below the line than above it. Therefore, slavery was given more land to be slave and therefore more power in the Senate, when the territories became state. In effect, the north got the short end of the stick and the south was given the first hint of being able to push around the north. The interesting thing is, the north agreed to all these provisions that would clearly benefit the south.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Though "everyone knew that a heavy majority of the Kansas settlers were antislavery", the proslavery crowd made a tough fight. The reason for the struggle mainly rested on Buchanan's shoulders. The Kansas-Nebraska Act resolved for popular sovereignty, and its author, Stephen A. Douglas, wanted to take all measures to ensure this. He convinced Buchanan to appoint Robert J. Walker as governor of Kansas, with orders that "the constitution be laid before the people". When the people of Kansas rejected the Lecompton Constitution, a proslavery constitution, Buchanan still tried to ram it down the congress's throat. He upheld it as long as possible, giving the southern proslaveryites time to gain "fresh strength".…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Missouri Compromise, one of the most known agreements in American history, was an attempt presented by Henry Clay in calming sectional division between the Northern and Southern states over the issue of slavery. While the Missouri Compromise found a temporary solution in regards to representation resulting in twelve free states and twelve slave states(G), it also, however, ignited the strong feelings, opinions, and justifications of two opposing sides and "heralded" the future unsuccess of the Union. No longer could our forefathers postpone such an imminent issue as was done during the infancy of the United States government. The Missouri Compromise was a success in a sense, not merely because of its contents, but rather because it caused people to voice their angered opinions about slavery, unavoidably causing the government to realize the importance of finding a genuine solution to the reality of slavery if the future of America was to survive and truly be united.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Caused Succession?

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1854, the Kansas-Nebraska Act was an act that repealed the Missouri Compromise (Doc. 5). The Missouri Compromise was an agreement that allowed the state of Missouri to enter as a slave state; all territory north of 36-30 latitude was considered a free state. In the Kansas-Nebraska Act, Senator Douglas (Doc. 3) demanded to divide the land west of Missouri into two territories, Kansas and Nebraska. There was a request popular sovereignty; this allowed the people to vote and decide if they wanted a free or slave state. Later on, pro-slavery and anti-slavery supporters traveled to Kansas to determine the results f the first election after it was put into affect. When another election was held, the two groups argued and it led to…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Americans today continued to debate whether the civil war was inevitable, but there is no doubt that the Kansas-Nebraska Act made the ghastly conflict much more likely. And for that reason, it should be remembered as one of the most consequential pieces of legislation in American…

    • 921 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kansas Nebraska Act – An act that repealed the Missouri Compromise by deciding the issue of slavery in Kansas and Nebraska via. Popular sovereignty…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays