Preview

The Kansas-Nebraska Act

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
372 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Kansas-Nebraska Act
The Kansas-Nebraska act was a proposal by Sen. Stephen A. Douglas which said that Kansas and Nebraska territory could be allowed to govern for itself whether or not to be a slave state or a free state. By a vote of its residents the territories would become a slave or a free state.This caused many fights between Northerners and Southerners. As a result many people were killed.

This act was fair because it gave the majority of the population the choice. This would be better because if the government just said that the land was a free state the people who had slaves would have to move out of their state and travel to a slave state, so they could keep their slaves and not have to sell them. It would be good because the people who have the choice
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ch. 18 Apush Study the American Pageant
    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Ch. 18 Apush Study the American Pageant

    It was good (and liked by politicians) because it was a compromise between the extremes of the North and the South, and it stuck with the idea of self-determination, but it could spread slavery.…

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Missouri Compromise Research Paper
    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Missouri Compromise Research Paper

    The Missouri Compromise was created in 1820 to put an end to the conflict between the slave and non-slave states, however, it only caused the conflict to worsen. The dispute began to get worse and worse, eventually making the sectionalism between the North and South increase. The Missouri Compromise ignited sectionalism within the United States, which further contributed to a terrible War.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Missouri Compromise Dbq
    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Missouri Compromise Dbq

    The Missouri Compromise is commonly thought of as the beginning of American sectionalism, although the signs were visible long before 1819. The crisis solved by the compromise certainly alerted the South for the need for political unity in order to maintain its way of life in the face of a more populous North. Likewise, it alerted both regions to the political problems inherent in westward expansion. The Missouri Compromise did not create sectionalism, but it is important as the first possible signs of sectionalist differences in the US.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 4 study guide
    • 543 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Unit 4 study guide

    14. Kansas Nebraska Act of 1854- Advances by Senator Stephen Douglas; would allow pop. Sov. to decide slavery in Nebraska and Kansas.…

    • 543 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Chapter 13 Apush Assignment
    • 2422 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Chapter 13 Apush Assignment

    Kansas Nebraska Act- 1854 created the territories of Kansas and Nebraska, opened new lands, repealed the Missouri Compromise of 1820, and allowed settlers in those territories to determine if they would allow slavery within their boundaries…

    • 2422 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Political Reasons For The Kansas-Nebraska Act
    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Political Reasons For The Kansas-Nebraska Act

    The Kansas-Nebraska act is best understood as the breakup of the democratic party. It was introduced in January 1854 by Stephen Douglas. He was a democrat senator from Illinois. He was trying to help the country spread westward to place himself for national power. to figure out a way to overcome the sectional disputes that were remaining in the aftermath of 1850, trying to do so to organize the territories between Mississippian river and the pacific coast. His main goal was to overcome all the debates about the future of slavery. His solution was Popular sovereignty, this meant that the citizens of each new territory would decide whether slavery was permitted. This violated the principle of the Missouri Compromise of 1820 that said all the Louisiana purchased north to the southern boundary of 36 30 line Missouri would be restricted. There were plenty of democrats in the north who hated that decision; Stephen Douglas and Franklin Pierce worked to support this legislation. The northern democratic party was decimated and many of those former democrats migrated to a new emerging republican party. Once it was in place, it became one of the preconditions necessary for what will become the breakup of the political party but the…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Dred Scott Decision: The Institution of Slavery in Politics
    • 4060 Words
    • 17 Pages

    The Dred Scott Decision: The Institution of Slavery in Politics

    The 1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act opened another battleground to the controversy. By leaving the slavery question up to popular sovereignty, Congress initiated a race between abolitionist and proslavery forces to control Kansas. Abolitionists encouraged free-soil advocates from New England and New York state to move to Kansas. Ministers like Henry Ward Beecher supported this emigration and encouraged their parishioners to help fund free-soil advocates. Meanwhile, proslavery forces urged slaveowners to relocate with their slaves. Southerners from Missouri and farther southeast made the move. The resulting conflict and bloodshed between the two groups earned the area the nickname Bleeding Kansas.4…

    • 4060 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kansas Nebraska Act Dbq
    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Kansas Nebraska Act Dbq

    The Kansas- Nebraska Act was proposed by Stephen Douglas in 1854. This Act stated that the territory of Nebraska would be split into two separate territories, Nebraska and Kansas. It also stated the people could vote on whether the territories would have slavery. This Act caused a large controversy between the people in the North and the South of the United States.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Missouri Compromise Dbq
    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Missouri Compromise Dbq

    The collection of documents about the Missouri Compromise in 1820 offer a rare insight into the significance of the changes to American society in the first part of the 19th century.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How The Difference In The Northern And Southern Economic Muscle
    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How The Difference In The Northern And Southern Economic Muscle

    He negotiated the Act that opened Kansas and Nebraska territories for settlement. It also advocated for territorial legislatures to have the power to decide on all slavery issues (Carnes & Garraty, 2012, p.354). The Act repealed the Missouri Compromise. Northern states vehemently opposed the Act as it led to an increase in the locality of slavery. In passing the law, the nation took the greatest single step in its march towards the abyss of civil war.…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act Of 1854
    • 246 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act Of 1854

    Another issue in the Civil War that revolved around land was the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. This Bill was passed for great measure, not only did it solve many political unknowns, but it also solved many things for the future. The Kansas Nebraska Act was enacted for “Popular Sovereignty” which means people rule, or something chosen by the government reflected by the citizens. This not only was important in the land matter, but also has connections to states rights and also the 10th Amendment. The Act let the settlers choose rather they wanted their state to be slavery or non-slavery. This caused many conflicts between the north and the south, due to the uneven amount of states wanting to be able to have slaves or to not have slaves. Not only…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bleeding Kansas: The Cause Of The Civil War
    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Bleeding Kansas: The Cause Of The Civil War

    Bleeding Kansas also took part in causing the Civil War. Bleeding Kansas was a war between the anti-slavery and pro-slavery activists. It took place between 1855 to 1861 (Ponce). Missouri was a slave state and Kansas had not yet decided to be pro-slavery or anti-slavery, and because the two sections did not agree with each other, that caused a war. “Yet the violence that broke out in the 1850s was an unintended consequence of the territory’s organization” (Ponce). President Franklin Pierce signed the Kansas-Nebraska Act in May 1854. Kansas could settle anywhere under the doctrine of popular sovereignty and allowed residents to determine their state institutions for themselves (Ponce). “While its geography should have meant a free Kansas, residents…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bleeding kansas
    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Bleeding kansas

    Many Kansans will certainly remember the years 1854 to 1861. It was filled with bloodshed, rebellious actions, lynching, and more bloodshed. The groups responsible for this viciousness were the ignorant pro-slavery and the anti-slavery clashing in their differences. Within a few months, Kansas was invaded by raids and riots from left and right. Stephan Douglass pushed for The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 which allowed the territory of Kansas to decide whether it would be free territory or slave territory, a practice known as popular sovereignty. It was obvious this decision was not going to be fixed properly or peacefully. People from other states soon decided to invade in the discussions and cross over into Kansas Territory to try and fix the votes making Kansas pro-slavery. From the south came people called Border Ruffians who made this issue a lot more difficult than it should be. They began a lot of violence, such as the “Raid on Lawrence” in attempt to force the acceptance of slavery. Why do they feel the need to invade in issues that should not be their business? In May 1856, Ruffians crossed the border and looted and burned multiple buildings, this act kicked open the door to more violent acts. A few days later the anti-slavery supporters caused the Pottawatomie Creek Massacre. John Brown attacked a pro-slavery settlement, killing five of the men. This controversy and violence was so large and out of control that it was impossible for federal authorities to contain it.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Controversy Before the Civil War
    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Controversy Before the Civil War

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act and Dred Scott Case (1857) decision highlighted the slavery disagreement and caused even more problems between the Northern and Southern States, pushing the U.S. even closer to the Civil War. The Kansas-Nebraska Act, passed in 1854 as a small compromise, enforced popular sovereignty in Kansas and Nebraska, creating disagreements over whether these territories would choose to become free or slave states. The Kansas-Nebraska Act even created tensions over the overturned Missouri Compromise of 1820, which had held the nation together by allowing slavery north of the already created line. In result, pro-slavery and anti-slavery groups flooded Kansas and battled in the…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Civil war political system
    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Civil war political system

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act was one of the sparks to the civil war. This Act allowed Kansas and Nebraska to become a territory in the United States. But there was a law called Popular Sovereignty. In these two new territories there were pro-slavery people and anti-slavery people. Popular Sovereignty stated that the people in the territories of Kansas and Nebraska could vote on whether or not there would be slavery in the territory. Now if you think about it there are people that are for slavery and people that are against slavery in the same territory voting on whether or not there should be slavery in that territory. Of course there was going to be some tension between all the people, and tension leads to fights and arguments. Fights and arguments lead to wars, civil wars!…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics