Preview

Bleeding kansas

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
415 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bleeding kansas
“Bleeding Kansas”: Whose side will you take? Many Kansans will certainly remember the years 1854 to 1861. It was filled with bloodshed, rebellious actions, lynching, and more bloodshed. The groups responsible for this viciousness were the ignorant pro-slavery and the anti-slavery clashing in their differences. Within a few months, Kansas was invaded by raids and riots from left and right. Stephan Douglass pushed for The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 which allowed the territory of Kansas to decide whether it would be free territory or slave territory, a practice known as popular sovereignty. It was obvious this decision was not going to be fixed properly or peacefully. People from other states soon decided to invade in the discussions and cross over into Kansas Territory to try and fix the votes making Kansas pro-slavery. From the south came people called Border Ruffians who made this issue a lot more difficult than it should be. They began a lot of violence, such as the “Raid on Lawrence” in attempt to force the acceptance of slavery. Why do they feel the need to invade in issues that should not be their business? In May 1856, Ruffians crossed the border and looted and burned multiple buildings, this act kicked open the door to more violent acts. A few days later the anti-slavery supporters caused the Pottawatomie Creek Massacre. John Brown attacked a pro-slavery settlement, killing five of the men. This controversy and violence was so large and out of control that it was impossible for federal authorities to contain it. According to the northern views, most agree that since there is a popular sovereignty rule to become free or not, the Border Ruffians should not interfere with what goes on and let them be a free state. They can find different, easier and less inhumane ways to create a living. The southern people, as stated before, still want another slave state and to not let the fertile soil go to waste. But you won’t be wasting it if you stop slavery. There

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1856 a law was passed that Kansas and Nebraska were able to vote on whether or not or not to be a slave state. Kansas was the first to get all their votes in and it ultimately ended up being a slave state. John Brown and the anti-slavery advocates did not like the results of Kansas now being a slave state. In response to Kansas being a slave state they made a “Lawrence Kansas” which is ultimately a free-settlement in the territory of Kansas. Pro-slavery advocates did not like that they did this so they went to Lawrence Kansas and burnt the town to the ground. John Brown and his anti-slavery advocates despised that they did this to innocent people. So, he got revenge for the burning of the city by killing five pro-slavery supporters next…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    sample orr and ozark mo

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages

    During the elections of 1860, the United States was divided by decisions concerning slavery. The Missouri territory came to the United States as part of the 1803 Louisiana Purchase. The House of Representatives put forward an amendment to the admission of Missouri that would prohibit the introduction of slaves into Missouri and freeing the children of slaves at the age of 25. The Senate passed the bill admitting Missouri without the amendment, but it was rejected by the House, pushing the controversy into 1820. The Great Compromiser, Henry Clay, proposed the following elements of a sectional compromise: That Missouri be admitted to the Union as a slave state (as the population of the territory apparently desired).That slavery was to be prohibited from the new American territories in the Louisiana Purchase north of 36/30’ north latitude (the southern boundary of Missouri). States to the south of the line (the new Arkansas Territory) would decide the slavery issue for themselves. Missouri became the 24th state on August 10, 1821. The Missouri Compromise was canceled in 1854 with the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    he Bleeding Kansas (1861) was a conflict between anti-slavery forces in the North and pro-slavery forces from the South, and its violence indicates that compromise unlikely. here were 5,000 pro-slavery men invaded Kansas, and 200 men died and the killing spree took place for ten years in a row. The question of the conflict is whether Kansas would allow or decline slavery, and if Kansas would become a slave or free state. After the Bleeding Kansas, Preston Brooks attacked Charles Sumner after he gave a speech attacking the forces for Kansas. Lincoln's election, who was a Republican, supported the banning of slavery in the United States. In 1852, the book Uncle Tom's Cabin was written before the Civil War took action but it relates to the Civil…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The 1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act opened another battleground to the controversy. By leaving the slavery question up to popular sovereignty, Congress initiated a race between abolitionist and proslavery forces to control Kansas. Abolitionists encouraged free-soil advocates from New England and New York state to move to Kansas. Ministers like Henry Ward Beecher supported this emigration and encouraged their parishioners to help fund free-soil advocates. Meanwhile, proslavery forces urged slaveowners to relocate with their slaves. Southerners from Missouri and farther southeast made the move. The resulting conflict and bloodshed between the two groups earned the area the nickname Bleeding Kansas.4…

    • 4060 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kansas Nebraska Act Dbq

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act that was passed by Congress in 1854 increased the already building tension between the North and the South. It caused a civil war in Kansas and many people believed that it was one of the causes of the American Civil War. The disastrous effects that were caused by the Kansas-Nebraska Act serves as an example of what could happen if people in America today were to become as divided over an issue as they were over…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most Northerners didn’t hate slavery enough to do anything about it. Sadly, it was an ugly part of American culture and people were content ignoring it so they could go about their lives. They didn’t agree with slavery but they feared that if the slaves were freed they would move north and take jobs away from white families. White people in the North were expanding westward into the territories where they could farm their own land and make money off crops. They did not want the territories to have the southern slave based labor system because it would only benefit a few wealthy people and it would greatly harm the country’s economy to expand slavery.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Did John Brown's Raid

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On October 16, 1859, John Brown, a radical abolitionist of the North, led a small army of 18 men into the small town of Harpers Ferry, Virginia. He seized the arms and ammunition in the federal arsenal and planned to arm slaves to instigate slave rebellions in the South. He was captured by the militia and Lieutenant Colonel Robert E. Lee’s troops, and was quickly sentenced to death. John Brown’s raid on Harpers Ferry received polarized comments. While he was hailed as a martyr by Chicago’s Republican press, Democratic newspaper in South Carolina and Illinois condemned him as a criminal. At the same time, the Northern press did not ask for the execration of Brown’s penalty in hopes of preserving the Union, but the South viewed this event as another strong reason for seceding. John Brown’s raid has a profound effect on deepening sectional and partisan divide between North and South.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Election time came around to decide whether or not Kansas would be a free or slave state in 1854. During the election, hundreds of pro-slavery men from Missouri came and casted fraudulent ballots, which outvoted anti-slavery settlers. So Kansas adopted the same laws of Missouri including “Slave Code.” This angered the anti-slavery forces which then concluded into a civil war of Kansas. This war will be known as Bleeding Kansas.…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act set the stage for what began “Bleeding Kansas” and ultimately the Civil War. As settlers began moving west of the Mississippi River, they moved into the area which is present-day Nebraska. Since the area was not yet a structured state, the people could not live there. The area that was wanted was located in a part of the United States that had outlawed slavery due to the Missouri Compromise of 1820. This, in turn, caused representatives in Congress to have no interest in creating a Nebraska territory. Senator Stephen A. Douglas was the driving factor behind the Kansas-Nebraska Act. With the goal in mind that Nebraska would become a territory, the Kansas- Nebraska Act would allow each territory the ability to choose whether or not they supported slavery. With this being enacted, it was a direct violation of the Missouri Compromise. The bill that allowed territories to decide for or against slavery, also known as popular sovereignty, split the Whig party into two different groups; the northern Whigs and the southern Whigs with the northerners organizing the Republican Party.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Americans today continued to debate whether the civil war was inevitable, but there is no doubt that the Kansas-Nebraska Act made the ghastly conflict much more likely. And for that reason, it should be remembered as one of the most consequential pieces of legislation in American…

    • 921 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott Decision Essay

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The North and the South had very different views on slavery which only grew stronger and separated the two regions leading up to the Civil War. As the Union gained more land the big question was whether the new land would be considered a slave state or a free state. The South needed slaves to do hard labor on their land to keep the economy growing. The North did not have a need for slaves. They feared that allowing slavery in the North would increase large plantations in the area which would threaten their own growing industrial economy. An underlying issue with the South was the fear that the federal government would take control over the individual states and their rights, especially concerning slavery.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Slavery is one of the major differences between the South and the North. If the South and the North were to separate, it might lead to less arguments, and battles over what is correct. Slavery has always been an issue in this government that we have. Therefore, this issue will never go away, because one party will be upset. If slavery is abolished, then the South would be upset, and if slavery is not abolished, then the North would be upset.…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sectional Crisis

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Compromise of 1850 was a compromise that stated California would be admitted as a free state, the slave auction would end in Washington D.C, settlers of Mexico and Utah would decide whether it would be considered a free or slave state through popular sovereignty, and lastly it stated that the Fugitive Slave Act would be enacted. These four things had an extreme affect on the national unity. This compromise made the southerners furious, and not only did they feel like they didn’t have a say, they felt like the north was embarrassed of them. The south felt as though it was unfair that the north got to choose that California as a whole was a free state, without consent from them, especially since almost half of that land should have belonged to them following the Missouri Compromise. What gave the north the right to make the decisions that will ultimately affect the nation as a whole? The south was built off of slavery, slavery auctions, and anything that was related to slavery and when Washington, D.C, our nations capitol banned slave auctions from their area the southerners felt very down, almost as though they were an embarrassment to the nation. When the nation found out that the settlers themselves, of Mexico and Utah got to decide whether the territories would be admitted as slave or free states extremists from both the north and south made their way to these territories with intentions of admitting the new territories in their favor. Lastly, was the Fugitive Slave act which the south was actually benefiting from; in the beginning. For once, the north didn’t benefit and they were furious, they didn’t think it was their responsibility to capture run away…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Bleeding Kansas

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Before the Civil War, the territory of Kansas was unsettled as a slave state or a free state. This caused a conflict over who should settle this territory, right before the Civil War. This conflict was also called “Bleeding Kansas”. Later on, popular sovereignty, played a key role before the Civil War.…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During this time in history change was occurring throughout the country. We were seeing this movement called the progressive movement sweep the nation. Kansas was reflecting on this too, as seen everywhere, Kansas felt the effects of monopolies as well, and Kansans along with all the other Americans believed that something had to be done.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics