Preview

The Influence of Business Groups on Government Decisions

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1963 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Influence of Business Groups on Government Decisions
“The flaw in the pluralist heaven is that the heavenly chorus sings with a strong upper-class accent” (p. 336), this statement is written by E.E Schattschneider. This debate surrounds the extreme amount of power or influence business groups have on government. For most of us who pay attention to government issues, it is obvious that the business elites basically make all the decisions concerning society when they only count as the minority in our society. Their rules, laws, and ways of thinking are usually implemented on the other members of our society. Business groups have first opportunity in making demands and decisions, although author of the Canadian Politics text book Rand Dyck says we are all given equal opportunity in decision making (p. 137), this is not true because the higher you are on the hierarchy the better chance you have of voicing out your opinion and issues. As an example, most decisions we see our government make today are catered more towards the rich or business owners. Business groups do have privileged access to government in lots of uncountable ways like being given closer attention, they have knowledge of politics that is needed by the state, and they have unlimited resources because of their social network with politicians. The other side of the debate argues that thousands of business groups go broke each year, that consumers and business groups do have equal amount of influence on government, and that both business groups and the public must “compete” in the marketplace of ideas and values, (Stanbury, p. 359). The YES side of the debate is more persuasive and believable than the opposite side of the argument.
According to William D. Coleman’s article, “Charles Lindblom says that ‘business persons are, in fact, public officials,’” (p. 339). I agree with this statement because business men and women are the ones usually seen holding government offices or positions, it seems like the regular everyday people are not given equal



References: Coleman, W. D. Do Business Groups Have Privileged Access to Government? Issue Seventeen. Dyck, R. (2006). Canadian Politics: Concise Fourth Edition. Nelson Education Ltd. Toronto, Ontario. Stanbury, W. T. Assessing the Political Power of Business Interests. Issue Seventeen.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Interest Groups

    • 2422 Words
    • 10 Pages

    They vary considerably in size and ideological perspectives. The strategies and tools employed by interest groups are not static, and they differ…

    • 2422 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is much easier to contrast the four contemporary theories of American democracy than to compare them, as pluralist, hyperpluralist, elite and class, and traditional theory each highlights the competitive foundation of politics. Each contemporary theory investigates the underlying question "Who governs our nation" yielding significantly different conclusions. While the pluralist theory emphasizes that politics is merely a competition among groups - a competition overwhelmingly controlled by the wealthy according to elite and class theory - hyperpluralism contends that these groups weaken the political backbone rather than support it. Pluralism and hyperpluralism are similar in that both agree that groups indelibly impact society and therefore the government by pressing their concerns through organized efforts, however they differ as to whether the impact is positive or negative, respectively. Hyperpluralism also contrasts with elite and class theory stating that many groups - not just the elite ones - are so strong that the government is unable to act. It asserts that there are too many ways for groups to control policy, regardless of their organization, topic, or funding. Traditional democratic theory is composed of key principles that an ideal democratic process should consist of: voting must be representative, a population must participate, civic understanding, citizen control of agenda, and inclusion. The majority rule - in which the will of over half the voters is followed - guarantees equality, control, and inclusion, guaranteeing rights to those subject to the laws that follow the policy making process. A key aspect to the theory is equal representation from each citizen, which under hyperpluralist and elite and class theory is thought of as endangered or nullified by the power of groups and the wealthy, respectively. Pluralism suggests that democratic theory is successful because…

    • 364 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition to the argument of the affluent as rational voters, Gilens and Page argues in their article, “Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups and Average Citizens” that politics is not a zero sum game because the views of the average citizens correlate with some of the preference of elites. But his data insufficient because his definition of affluent voters differs from the definition of affluent voters in this paper. Gilens “affluent” respondents in his study, were households with an annual income of only $146,000, as opposed to the .01% who make more than over 100 million dollars annually. Although the affluent voters Gilens describe make more than the average voter, and more than low income voters, their views are still highly correlated to one another because the gap between their incomes are not as significant. As demonstrated with people in the higher income bracket, the more money they earn the more involved they are with politics because of the policies that can…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This allows corporations to indirectly support political leaders, but ultimately they cannot voice their concerns. The essay also argues that corporations do in fact deserve to have the same protections since they are not technically able to vote, but must pay taxes. Without the ability to have free political speech, these corporations technically do not have any way to influence any decision that may affect their businesses or trades. The essay…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Chapter 10, 11, and 6 Notes

    • 4053 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Elitism: the idea that a select few – better educated, more informed, more interested – should have more influence on government…

    • 4053 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Indeed, it was James Madison in Federalist 10 that said that factions are groups that unite to serve selfish goals, not the national interest. It is necessary to control them through constitutional means, one of which is the creation of a large republic, which helps disperse factions and to reduce their influence on the national legislature. Madison in his paper is warning the contractures of the constitution that factions are the ultimate rival of the government. They will try to force upon government their own ideals instead of the more important issues of national interest.…

    • 2515 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    One way interest groups can influence elections is by endorsing a candidate. Some groups will back a candidate to gather support for him or her. Some interest groups will rate candidates based on their roll call votes. Also, interest groups create political action committees. They can send mail, advertise, stage rallies, and campaign door-to-door. These PACs can contribute money either directly to the candidate or indirectly by funding campaign activities.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Businesses Figure out that they can use their wealth to influence policy makers. Another article…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The second stage in the growth of in the timeline of interest groups, taking place further into the period of industrialization in the United States, revolves around the acceptingness of the predominantly middle-class interest groups. As businesses expand, and also attempt to abuse the law-granted power that they are gifted, interest groups require the support of more constituents in order to combat the businesses. To keep up with growing demands, interest groups began to accept the support of citizens, regardless of social class. The decision to remove social-class discrimination made sense, as many of the issues that affect the middle-class also affect the wealthy and the poor, especially with regards to global issues. Interest groups, with the combined powers of the social classes, naturally focus their attention towards the direct goals of their constituents. Thus, during this time period, the interest groups drifted naturally towards the economy and more specified groups, such as trade unions and groups focused on agriculture. By converging the efforts of multiple social classes, the interest groups begin to make changes in the United…

    • 1538 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through the writings of Andrew Carneige, and Jay Gould, some of the wealthiest men of the era, both believed that the government should not be involved when it came to certain business choices. It is evident to see throughout these documents that if you were higher up in society, it changed the way you viewed and appreciated things.(…)…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Interest groups influence the American government very heavily and have become motivation for public policy. An interest group is an organized group of individuals, who together, support and try to publicly persuade the government to adopt certain policies. All interest groups are different, varying in size, purpose, unity, influence, and resources. They can range from mass membership, to labor unions, to large corporations. Interest groups have been the center of American politics for a very long time. According to the writers of the Federalist Papers, they favored the Constitution in a way that would both ease and restrain the activity of interest groups. Throughout history, interest groups have been very prominent in influencing change, policies, and social movement.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although they both serve as linkage institutions, interest groups and political parties have different goals in politics. The fundamental goal of interest groups is to influence legislative decisions and public policy by attempting to focus people’s attention on these topics or educate them on a certain issue or a small group of issues. They do this mostly by lobbying congressional committees at the local, state, and national levels, usually during campaign season. Grassroots lobbying and political action committees play a big role in lobbying efforts. Congress relies on funding and support from interest groups, and in return, the legislation focuses on the issues in which supporting interest groups specialize.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Elites, and not the masses, govern the United States: all major decisions are made by the elite minority….they have power. Elite members are anyone who participates in decisions that allocate resources for society…

    • 3542 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    While United States is one of the most powerful and successful countries in the world, it has many flaws in need of attention. One of the most prominent issues is the unequal representation of citizens in the government. Many factors contribute to this, but one significant cause of inequality is the representation of social classes. Even in the 1800s, Alexis De Tocqueville determined that the social class that held the most power would pass policies in their own favor (1835). Because of separation between social classes, the upper class has the most influence in government, the middle class is decently represented, and the lower class has a weak effect in democracy. Evidence shows that…

    • 1476 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Introduction: To analyse the compatibility of democracy with elitism it is first important to define both the terms democracy and elitism. Democracy is in its simplest form is the rule for the people by politicians etc, and elitism is most simply known as ‘a class that rules and a class that is ruled’. This therefore opens up the question, do those in higher positions effectively rule those lower down, democracy within elitism, and the effects if elitism was not around. ‘a minority which monopolises the effective exercise of power’. P69, schwarzmantel.…

    • 2496 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays