References
No child left behind. (2004). Education week spotlight. Retrieved November 5, 2010, from http://www.edweek.org/ew/issues/no-child-left-behind/
White, D. (2009). Pros & cons of the No Child Left behind Act. Us Liberal Politics. Retrieved November 4, 2010, from http://usliberals.about.com/od/education/i/NCLBProsCons2.htm
References: No child left behind. (2004). Education week spotlight. Retrieved November 5, 2010, from http://www.edweek.org/ew/issues/no-child-left-behind/ White, D. (2009). Pros & cons of the No Child Left behind Act. Us Liberal Politics. Retrieved November 4, 2010, from http://usliberals.about.com/od/education/i/NCLBProsCons2.htm
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The No Child Left Behind act has its pros and cons when it comes to the five core principles including strong accountability, expanded flexibility and control, methods based on scientific research, expanded options for parents, and highly qualified teachers. The pros and cons of the say this because when teaching diverse learners they are dealing with a variety of different learning styles. In turn every student will not respond to the No Child Left Behind principles or methods in the same manner, meaning that it may work for some while it may not work for others. The idea of strong accountability it is relevant to the teachers and the students. The teachers they are held accountable due to the set standards and curriculums that they have to teach and follow in order to meet the goals of the NCLB. Along with this they have to prepare the student for the standardized tests that are put in place to measure the students and the teacher’s progress. This is tricky because if the student fails teachers are held accountable while the students are also held responsible for themselves if they fail. This is when highly qualified teachers cone into effect due to the evaluations of their teaching through how the students perform on the standardized tests. In some ways this may be a good thing, but it can also be really bad too. If the students do good then the teachers look highly qualified but if the students don’t do a good job then the teachers look unqualified or as if they are not meeting the standards when that really may not be the case at all. Although teachers have certain curriculums to follow, they do have expanded flexibility and control regarding tailoring their lesson plans which is a good thing that gives them a little freedom. On the other hand it has its cons too because that in my opinion is about the only leeway that they have to make things their own. This will affect the students because teachers are stuck…
- 689 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
I chose this topic because most people don't know anything about the "No Child Left Behind Act", and I decided I wanted them to learn more about it. NO CHild Left Behind It is not clear whether or when the bills will move to the house floor debate.In meantime, much work reamains to educate Members of the Congress. The NCLB law effects what students are taught and the way the money is spent. The test they take will be training of their teachers.…
- 449 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) was signed into law in January, 2002 by President George W. Bush. On the surface, because of bipartisan support, the act brought about, for the first time, surveillance measures to ensure that all school-aged children would receive a free, quality, public education. When researched historically we see the pattern that has emerged through policy and politics that has brought about NCLB. As a result of the acceptance of NCLB, we have created a way of viewing success in education by standardized testing, a monster in and of itself in it’s cost and ability to quantify the successful components of a good liberal education. It is necessary to understand how the Act came about, how it is being implemented, and the problems that have ensued to gain a good perspective about the philosophy and policies of the NCLB.…
- 1041 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001(NCLB) is a landmark in education reform designed to improve student achievement and close achievement gaps. Passed with overwhelming bipartisan support from Congress, the law was signed by President George W. Bush on January 8, 2002. Clearly, our children are our future, and as President Bush has expressed. This law allows schools to receive reports cards instead of students.…
- 1018 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
NCLB does provide for much needed innovation in education and allows parents unprecedented choice in the education of their children but it may jeopardize the success of traditional public schools, with such things as promoting charter schools. It provides a testing ground for innovative ideas and programs in education. However the amount of money needed to fund the charter schools serves relatively few students and spends money that could benefit more students in innovative programs within traditional public schools. This does however expand school choice in that it gives parents more direct control of the students ' education than previous generations have enjoyed. With expanding school choice it creates instability of funding that causes hardships and inability to manage finances and staffing needs from year to…
- 1526 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
The most recent federal level reforms in education were No Child Left Behind and the Common Core State Standards. These two reforms were brought to American schools with a long-term plan on how to better our education system. With these plans to do so, it faced many critics and controversies with many people throughout America. The first reform, No Child Left Behind (NCLB) was brought up by President George W. Bush in 2002. This plan focused primarily on the testing and test participation of students in the third grade up until the eighth grade.…
- 790 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
“A hopeful America is one in which not one child is left behind.” This quote from President George W. Bush at a recent news conference represents the current philosophy of our government on education. In 2001 President Bush signed the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). The new law is an updated version of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) which was signed into law in 1965. Since then standardized testing has been a part of our school system in one form or another, yet there is little evidence that these tests have improved children’s learning through the years.…
- 1969 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The American education system has been on a gradual decline over the past several years and has become very non competitive to other nations across the world. This is quite surprising considering the fact that America has one of the most developed and strongest economies in the world yet is so far behind other countries in the education matter. One of the most recent debated issues in the U.S. Department of Education, is the 2002 No Child Left Behind Act signed by former President George W. Bush. According to many education intellects, this act is holding America back from achieving its full potential and getting back on track with the rest of the world. Diane Ravitch, who is a historian of American education, addresses this issue in “Time to Kill ‘No Child Left Behind.’” She says, “Congress should get rid of…
- 1789 Words
- 8 Pages
Good Essays -
According to the Washington Post, after No Child Left Behind (NCLB) was established, the US slipped from 18th in the…
- 534 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The United States educational system is preforming poorly compared to the rest of the world: America is ranked 17th in educational performance, 25th in Math, 17th in Science, and 14th in Reading skills. Disabled, minority, and underprivileged children are lacking the adequate resources to succeed in our school system. No Child Left Behind (NCLB) was a revised version of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (EASA) proposed by former President George Bush in 2001. The intent was to reform the educational system so American’s schools could have the opportunity to thrive domestically and internationally, grant children equality of opportunity, and boost students K-12 level of understanding in core subjects, such as science, technology, and math. This initiative sought to improve our lagging educational system in the U.S to inch closer to higher achieving educational standards, such as the United Kingdom. However, No Child Left Act is hindering children’s chance of a “healthy start, a head start, a fair start, a safe start, and a moral start in life,” by amplifying undesired pressure on students through standardized testing, increasing federal jurisdiction within schools, and minimizing the roles of additional core subjects, such as social studies and foreign languages. This…
- 1474 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
After talking about the background of policy, and why this particular policy was needed at the time and what problems it was trying to solve, it is now time to talk about the actual policy of No Child Left Behind. The main point of No Child Left Behind was to level the playing field in every public school in the United States who were disadvantaged, including: students in poverty, minorities, students who were receiving special educational services, and those who spoke little no English (retrieved from https://www.understood.org/en/school-learning/your-childs-rights/basics-about-childs-rights/no-child-left-behind-nclb-what-you-need-to-know). Based on this description, we can see that No Child Left Behind, was created to help those who ad…
- 1319 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (often referred to as No Child Left Behind) was a landmark in education reform designed to improve student achievement and change the culture of America's schools. President George W. Bush described this law as the "cornerstone of my administration" (Department of Education). It allows low-income families, whose children traditionally have less academic opportunities, to move to private school or specialized charter schools via a school voucher. The act was expected to introduce high standards for education, the belief that all children, regardless of class, should have equal opportunities to learn, and accountability for failing school systems. However, the act…
- 1045 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
When it comes to the children of America’s education, every child depends upon the accountability of their family, educators and the government. When President George W. Bush was in office, he expressed that “Too many of our neediest children are being left behind”. President Bush proposed the legislation of No Child Left Behind Act of 2001(NCLB) on January 8, 2002, to improve the quality of life and education for our nation. The No Child Left Behind Act was one of the more favorable and focused policy problems, shortly after the September 11th, attack. As it is understood, the government strongly believed that it was a necessity to continue to improve education now more than ever. The policy process was a pluralistic approach along with…
- 223 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
In 2002, the No Child Left Behind Act was enacted by Congress, which was intended to close the learning gap between Caucasian students and minority students. The NCLB promised to promote accountability amongst teachers and school administrators, as well as assuring that all children would be proficient – according to standards set by the individual states – in reading and math by the end of the 2013-2014 school year (Ravitch 2). In addition, NCLB stated that by the end of the 2005-2006 school-year every…
- 2683 Words
- 11 Pages
Best Essays -
The first reason that the schools are failing is because the bar that the NCLB sets has been set too high, and that the NCLB is failing. The NCLB itself is failing. The No Child Left behind Act, which was implemented by President Bush, is failing. Many educators would agree that the goals that the act sets, “every student in the country is supposed to be performing at grade level in math and reading by 2014”(Mandell 1), are impossible and that the standards are not fair, not accurate, and unrealistic. According to a survey, 48% of schools in the nation are not making “adequate yearly progress” (Mandell 1). This means that the No Child Left Behind Act is failing in 48 percent of the United States, so the act is clearly not effective and needs to be revised so that it has more obtainable goals. Furthermore, the standards were doubled by the NCLB. States are required to have reading and math tests once a year for 3rd to 8th graders and in 10th, 11th, or 12th grade students must take the test once, according to the NCLB. This new rule changes the number of tests from 3 to 7 (Popham 15-16). This rule is unfair because it more than doubles the standard that was previously in affect; this should have been a slow tradition and not have been all at once. Finally, even college professors know that the NCLB is failing. According to Arne…
- 2043 Words
- 9 Pages
Better Essays