Preview

Dbq No Child Left Behind

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1319 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Dbq No Child Left Behind
After talking about the background of policy, and why this particular policy was needed at the time and what problems it was trying to solve, it is now time to talk about the actual policy of No Child Left Behind. The main point of No Child Left Behind was to level the playing field in every public school in the United States who were disadvantaged, including: students in poverty, minorities, students who were receiving special educational services, and those who spoke little no English (retrieved from https://www.understood.org/en/school-learning/your-childs-rights/basics-about-childs-rights/no-child-left-behind-nclb-what-you-need-to-know). Based on this description, we can see that No Child Left Behind, was created to help those who ad …show more content…
They would try to accomplish this by having annual testing in subjects such as math, and reading to see their progress over the course of the school year, and schools would face severe penalties for schools that did not meet the goal that they had set for themselves (retrieved from https://www.understood.org/en/school-learning/your-childs-rights/basics-about-childs-rights/no-child-left-behind-nclb-what-you-need-to-know). By having a set of standards that the schools had to keep and having a penalty for schools that did not meet their goal, it sets a parameter that should put a focus on the quality of the education of the child, to make sure they are receiving a quality education. Going back to the penalty section of the policy, this was a good thing to have, when writing the policy. By having a penalty you out a consequence for the schools for not providing a good quality education to the students. If a school did not meet its target goal on their progress reports, students could have the option to change schools if they wished, leadership of the schools could change, or the schools could close down entirely (retrieved from https://www.understood.org/en/school-learning/your-childs-rights/basics-about-childs-rights/no-child-left-behind-nclb-what-you-need-to-know). This is important to know because it showed how seriously people were taking about the …show more content…
The policy was created by a group of people known as official actors. Official actors are according to Birkland (2016), are participants in the policy making process whose involvement is motivated or mandated by his/her official position in government, these people can include the President, people in Congress, the Courts, and etc. This definition seems to say that an official actor is the ones that hold some sort of position in government, and has the power to create policy. This then begs the question, who were the official actors who were behind the No Child Left Behind policy? The official actors behind the policy was President George W. Bush, who was the one who came up with the policy in the first place, and was co-sponsored by House Speaker John Boehner, George Miller and Senators Ted Kennedy, and Judd Gregg. (Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/nclb/overview/intro/guide/guide_pg12.html). From this we can see that the policy had bipartisanship wish is rare for the government. Usually, both parties tend to argue about how to create a policy, and would try to have the policy lean more in their favor over the other party. When this policy was being created, it seems like both parties knew of the severity of the country’s failing school system and decided to come together and form a policy that would be beneficial to all. When the bill came to a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The No Child Left Behind act has its pros and cons when it comes to the five core principles including strong accountability, expanded flexibility and control, methods based on scientific research, expanded options for parents, and highly qualified teachers. The pros and cons of the say this because when teaching diverse learners they are dealing with a variety of different learning styles. In turn every student will not respond to the No Child Left Behind principles or methods in the same manner, meaning that it may work for some while it may not work for others. The idea of strong accountability it is relevant to the teachers and the students. The teachers they are held accountable due to the set standards and curriculums that they have to teach and follow in order to meet the goals of the NCLB. Along with this they have to prepare the student for the standardized tests that are put in place to measure the students and the teacher’s progress. This is tricky because if the student fails teachers are held accountable while the students are also held responsible for themselves if they fail. This is when highly qualified teachers cone into effect due to the evaluations of their teaching through how the students perform on the standardized tests. In some ways this may be a good thing, but it can also be really bad too. If the students do good then the teachers look highly qualified but if the students don’t do a good job then the teachers look unqualified or as if they are not meeting the standards when that really may not be the case at all. Although teachers have certain curriculums to follow, they do have expanded flexibility and control regarding tailoring their lesson plans which is a good thing that gives them a little freedom. On the other hand it has its cons too because that in my opinion is about the only leeway that they have to make things their own. This will affect the students because teachers are stuck…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 2002 President Bush and democratic Senator Edward M. Kennedy supported the reform bill Np child Left Behind Act. This act created higher standard and goals for schools in order to improve the education system across all the states. There are four main pillars, the first are results, the scores are broken down by demographics and then it is determined if the school is needed to add more programs in order to better the scores. If no improvement is made then the school will have to reorganize. The second is that the funds are more flexible when it comes to spending. The third pillar is government created programs like, “Reading First”. the last pillar is the ability for student’s parents to change their child’s school because the scores are not being met, without extra charge on the school or the…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is an extension of President Lyndon B. Johnson’s Great Society program (Klein, 2015). Johnson’s heart was in the right place but after being tweaked so many times I think that government bureaucrats lost sight of the reason for the original act by Johnson. There was such a focus on competing with other countries that children truly got left behind. The government put so much pressure on schools for their students to perform well on testing that schools had no choice but to start teaching to the test and leave other ways of teaching lessons on the back burner. I was a representative on the school board for our school system here where we live, we had the discussion of NCLB many times. One thing that we had discussed about the NCLB is how mentally disabled students were to take the same testing as the other students, and the testing not taking into consideration that those students would never be able to perform to those…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Week 3 Comm2

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Associated Press. (2013) tells readers about how the White house has passed a bill that replaced the No Child Left Behind Act that will give the states and their state government the ability to choose how they can improve their school and reduce federal involvement in their educational matters, so instead of the federal running the school it will be each state and their state government running the educational part of their schools.…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    George Bush did not just wake up one morning, turn to Laura and say, “I got a good education and so did you, wouldn’t it be great if every school child in this country could get what we got?” The Massachusetts Law of 1642 stated as it’s goal that all school-aged children would attend school in order to learn to read and write (Hlebowitsh, 2001). The real object of the law was to educate the male children of the wealthy (Mondale, “The Common School, “ 2001). It was believed by church leaders and politicians that men would need to be able to read the Bible and political documents. Only large towns had a tax base, and so many children did not have access to public schools. Education grew in the U.S. but still violated the Declaration of Independence and Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution by denying minorities their civil rights, which included the right to a free quality public education. Many people believe that Brown v. Board of Education, that demanded that minorities receive…

    • 1041 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nclb Essay

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This law was initially passed by Congress in 1965, during President Lyndon Johnson’s term. With the passage of No Child Left Behind, Congress reauthorized the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA), the principal federal law affecting education from kindergarten through high school. In amending ESEA, the new law represents a sweeping overhaul of federal efforts to support elementary and secondary education in United States. Before 1965, all school funds were from local tax dollars.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nclb Pros And Cons

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages

    "No Child Left Behnd is based on testing, blaming and punishing," explained Lisa Guisbond, co-author of the FairTest report. "a more helpful…

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The premise of the No Child Left Behind Act is that every child has an equal opportunity for a good education. For this goal to be met, each state must bring 95-100% of…

    • 1969 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American education system has been on a gradual decline over the past several years and has become very non competitive to other nations across the world. This is quite surprising considering the fact that America has one of the most developed and strongest economies in the world yet is so far behind other countries in the education matter. One of the most recent debated issues in the U.S. Department of Education, is the 2002 No Child Left Behind Act signed by former President George W. Bush. According to many education intellects, this act is holding America back from achieving its full potential and getting back on track with the rest of the world. Diane Ravitch, who is a historian of American education, addresses this issue in “Time to Kill ‘No Child Left Behind.’” She says, “Congress should get rid of…

    • 1789 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nclb Thesis

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The United States educational system is preforming poorly compared to the rest of the world: America is ranked 17th in educational performance, 25th in Math, 17th in Science, and 14th in Reading skills. Disabled, minority, and underprivileged children are lacking the adequate resources to succeed in our school system. No Child Left Behind (NCLB) was a revised version of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (EASA) proposed by former President George Bush in 2001. The intent was to reform the educational system so American’s schools could have the opportunity to thrive domestically and internationally, grant children equality of opportunity, and boost students K-12 level of understanding in core subjects, such as science, technology, and math. This initiative sought to improve our lagging educational system in the U.S to inch closer to higher achieving educational standards, such as the United Kingdom. However, No Child Left Act is hindering children’s chance of a “healthy start, a head start, a fair start, a safe start, and a moral start in life,” by amplifying undesired pressure on students through standardized testing, increasing federal jurisdiction within schools, and minimizing the roles of additional core subjects, such as social studies and foreign languages. This…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    School is kind of a hard thing to go to. The work is good but them people that are around you there are bad influences. Some people are mean and some are friendly some even tell stories and try to copy your work. People that don’t like to do their own work is not going to get anywhere in life. The no child left behind actually came from the 21st century. Schools should not miss an AYP that is some like an inspection. If any school misses it and continues to miss it then it will be shut down completely. Obama also talked about the no child left behind program he thinks that’s an exhalent idea. He even made leadership changes for the people.The thing about no child left alone is to narrow or even close an achievement space in America. Trying to make it happen with everyone will be hard and will take a little time because some kids don’t listen. Kids will get mad about the classroom rules but it will make a difference. Some teachers can’t control kids like they would want to because that’s not there child. A teacher that has been teacher for a long time can only control the kids because either he/she have heard and seen it…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    High School and Act

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Bibliography: 1. Aubry, Larry (2004, January 22) Urban Perspective; No Child Left Behind Leaves Behind Children in Need. Los Angeles Sentinel A7…

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    No Child Left Behind Act

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The No Child Left Behind Act, a federal social program that tries to encourages after school programs should be eliminated and the extra funds given to schools to decide where it goes.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    No Child Left Behind Act

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The No Child Left Behind Law was passed by Congress in 2001in an attempt to increase the federal role in education and mandate requirements that will affect every public school in America, including Texas. The goal of the NCLB act was to create procedures intended to shut achievement gaps between different groups of students. States are mandated to increase student testing, gather and publicize subgroup results, guarantee a highly qualified teacher in every classroom, and guarantee that all students, despite of socioeconomic factors, attain a capable level of education and that no child will be left behind. It basically requires states to make more extensive changes and meet exceptionally positive deadlines. Obeying the requirements of NCLB is going to be a challenge for many states and teachers if they want to continue receiving federal funding and not to be replaced with someone more highly trained.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Enabaling Ignorance

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “No child left behind” act (NCLB) passed this year through congress which was originally passed in 2002, that shows how can be common sense and experience is replaced. The author, Diane Ravitch pointed out in her book that NCLB promotes the weakness in American public school, rather than improving their strengths. The idea of passing NCLB proven wrong, because it is wasting of federal dollars, it increases corruption, and it a-parts teachers from the school system.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays