Preview

Should Human Cloning Be Banned?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1663 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should Human Cloning Be Banned?
The informational piece of Pro-Human Cloning that is produced by Simon Smith describes that cloning should be legalized because it allows couples another alternative to conception so if parent(s) want to have children that have the same genetically related child whose DNA was similar to those of the parent. Moreover, it allows the curing and prevention of diseases, and it allows one to clone organs and cells to improve treatment of life threatening-illnesses.
However, even though Simon Smith reveals some reasons why human cloning should not be banned, I do not agree with the writer, I think human cloning must be banned because of medical cloning is immoral by exploits woman for her eggs; creates and destroy human life, shows a lack of respect
…show more content…
And we know from nature’s law that the strongest will win, if we are normal people must fight against superhuman clones, we will lose for sure and our race as normal person will be extinct and being replace by clone people even though we are the creator of them, so we must be careful of doing that.
Another reason why human cloning should be banned is because the population will be exploded (McGee), since the problem of some great countries are over population, if they clone a lot of human even the success rate is small they will make population really crowded, its implication is that we won’t have enough resources and food to nourish cloned humans. This idea is demented, think about the poor kids in the third world countries would it be fair to them? They deserve to have food on their table every meal. We first have to think about others, and then we can think about our people that have passed
…show more content…
Nakasone, a Buddhist priest and Professor of Buddhist Art and Culture at the Graduate Theological Union in Berkeley, California stated, "The Buddhist response to the possibility of cloning human beings is not if, but when . . . Would we accord a cloned person the benefits enjoyed by those who are born naturally? I would hope so." Buddhists even believe in the natural order of the world and to clone humans would be violating that rule. In addition, why human cloning should be banned is because human clone can be a fraud or criminal, so our clone will do something horrible with our identity, some police departments will be difficult to track the real criminal if we have the same genetics, the same physics but not the same manner, it is not good for us as good people to be libel by our clone if our clone is not good clone. We can see some religions are against the human cloning because it is not our right to play God by creating

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    As revealed earlier, cloning humans has a high failure rate, because there are many barriers put in by nature to prevent an “unnatural” event from occurring. These barriers can happen anytime during the cloning process. For example, the enucleated egg might not be compatible with the donor nucleus, the newly transferred nucleus may not grow and develop properly, the step where the embryo is implanted into the surrogate could fail, or the pregnancy may fail. Even if the pregnancy succeeds, there is no guarantee that the clone will act like a clone unless the right genes are activated. In a transferred human cloning, the scientist has to re-program the nucleus and force it to pretend as if it belongs in an early embryonic stage. If the nucleus is not programmed properly or completely, the embryo will more than likely become abnormal or die. Now, if the embryo manages to pass all of the post-zygotic barriers, “there is a possibility that the [fully developed] cloned individual might carry certain abnormalities…” causing them to live a shorter life span than expected (Wickman). There are also other concerns, besides health-related, such moral issues. The ability to clone individuals could lead to an out-of-control situation created by someone who wants to create an army of genetic replicas by abusing the new…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cloning is a process in which an organism or cell is replicated. Cloning should stop because it is not natural, it is wrong to force specific results. Cloning causes animals to live a shorter amount of time or be born with LOS causing permanent damage. What is not natural should not be forced especially if the results are…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Let's just say if a clone survives birth and it’s childhood and had Large Offspring Syndrome, If all of the conditions like cardiomyopathy diabetes, high rates of heart and lung damage, kidney failure brain abnormalities etc. The animal in labor and the clone is give birth in a filthy Barn house. In that scenario the clone animal that is giving birth, percentage of life is one in million. Another reason that cloning should not be in society is the lack of diversity. “Cloning involves a process of creating identical genes. As such, there would be a lack of diversity in animalkind. Scientists believe this lack of diversity will lower the different animal race’s ability to adapt. Plus, there would be a lack of diversity in the world leading to everyone looking the same.…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    While a large portion of society do not believe that we should clone any species there is the portion that whole heartedly support the quest to prefect not only the cloning of animals but the cloning of humans. By cloning we can create new ways to fight diseases and other health problems by doing things like cloning a liver for a person whose is shutting down. Cloning can also help bring a species back from the brink of extinction due…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Human Cloning? Don't Just Say No," written by Ruth Macklin, a professor of Bioethics, discusses the negative responses people have regarding human cloning. As the title says: "Human Cloning? Don't Just Say No," Macklin believes that cloning deserves a chance to be developed in humans. Though there may not be any substantial benefits to human cloning, nobody has presented a persuasive case that cloning is harmful either.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the main issues that cloning brings about is whether or not people will take advantage of this new technology. For instance, Lewis Thomas wonders if “the rich and powerful but socially objectionable” or the “governments of dumb, docile masses” will misuse the technology. These seemingly important people may be able to give themselves a “version of immortality”. Just because the ability to clone exists does not mean that valuable people should be able to multiply themselves. No one on Earth is exactly the same for a reason, and it should stay that way. If there were to be several hundred Paris Hiltons or Kim Kardashians walking around, the world would be a pretty terrifying place. People should remain unique, separate from the “precise sameness” that Thomas…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many opinions that different from both sides of going for and against animal cloning. Jacqueline Langwith writes, “Some people don't like cloning because they do not like the idea of recreating an animal or species” (Langwith). Although her statement provides a rationale why certain people may not like this process, they do not understand that animal cloning is not hurting the species. Cloning is saving species. Therefore, animal cloning should be legalized. Cloning can save endangered species, researchers can use animal clones for a food source, and researchers can study organs and tissues from clones.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Research Outline

    • 1598 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Evidence: “ With the advancement and expansion of technology science has been able to achieve new wonders. These improvements and discoveries in science have allowed the human race to explore and learn more about the world. One such phenomenon is cloning. Cloning has opened the doors to explore human beings in a way that was once never possible. With cloning the human body, as well as other organisms, will be studied. Cloning and genetic engineering will both come into play to improve scientific knowledge.” (Serendip, 1)Citation: ( Serendip, Cloning right or wrong)Evidence: Many people believe human cloning should be banned prior to human defects, health problems, not proper treatment, and many other things. Human cloning Has not been exactly successful, and most of the time it has failed. However, scientist are trying to figure things out and fix itCitation: ( Serendip, Cloning right or wrong)…

    • 1598 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thesis: “Those who support human cloning make several claims of fact, value and policy to argue their case for human cloning.”…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cloning Persuasive Essay

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages

    What was once thought to be the content of fiction novels and comic books is now being fully explored and realized in the cutting edge world of modern science. Scientists now possess the necessary capabilities and technology to make the process of human cloning a reality. While this is a controversial and rather sensitive topic, cloning is an innovative practice that has the potential to vastly improve the lives of unlimited amounts of people. Although cloning may prove to be a useful remedy for many of today’s issues, there are those in the scientific and medical fields who remain vehemently opposed to its practice. It is for this reason that lawmakers, scientists, and doctors around the world are currently locked in a fierce standoff that will determine what if any, impact that cloning will have upon our ever-changing society. Each side has compiled substantial evidence against the other as to why cloning should or should not be legalized and practiced. It is my strong belief that the curative effects that could be reaped by practicing cloning far outweigh the arguments of anti-cloning advocates; the practice of human cloning should be legalized and practiced. Countless individuals could benefit from its various applications and the future of medicine would be drastically enhanced.…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cloning Persuasive Essay

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why shouldn't humans attempt to clone living organisms including humans? Why do people think it is wrong? Nevertheless, natural cloning occurs everywhere. All plants, some insects, algae, unicellular organisms that conduct mitosis or binary fissions, and identical twins are all clones of each other. As long as genetic make-up is the same they are considered clones. Cloning would bring endless potentially important benefits to everyday life and more importantly, the future.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Human Cloning

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In the article that I chose there are two opposing viewpoints on the issue of "Should Human Cloning Ever Be Permitted?" John A. Robertson is an attorney who argues that there are many potential benefits of cloning and that a ban on privately funded cloning research is unjustified and that this type of research should only be regulated. On the flip side of this issue Attorney and medical ethicist George J. Annas argues that cloning devalues people by depriving them of their uniqueness and that a ban should be implemented upon it. Both express valid points and I will critique the articles to better understand their points.…

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Have you ever had one of ‘those’ days? You know which ones; the days where there just aren’t enough hands to go around or enough time to finish everything that needs to be done. Those are the days that people tend to have that one fleeting thought: “If only there were two of me, I could relax while my clone does all the work!” But if they had the chance to try it, to have a clone, knowing all of the risks and consequences involved, would they go through with it? No, probably not, but the average person doesn’t think about what the repercussions of cloning themselves may be: repercussions that justify the outlawing of the cloning process.…

    • 2285 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human Cloning

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Just as times change, so do the solutions to problems we are faced with. There is a certain point however, when we have to reevaluate just how much we should allow these new technologies to take over our lives. Human cloning holds extraordinary capabilities that definitely have the power to change our lives and the lives of future generations. Would it benefit us to have the capability to clone a human being? Perhaps, but do the pros outweigh the cons?…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should Cloning Be Banned

    • 604 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The subject of human cloning is a very controversial topic. The cloning of Dolly the sheep in 1997 by scientist Ian Wilmut generated a very unexpected reaction around the world. However these reactions were not all positive. Cloning refers to the development of offspring that are identical to their parents genetically. While it is referred to as an unnatural process, it can occur quite often in nature. Identical twins, for example, are clones. However, human cloning is very new and very complex. In this essay I will examine both sides of the argument into the banning of cloning starting with reasons why cloning should not be banned.…

    • 604 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics