Preview

The Pros And Cons Of Cloning

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
686 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Pros And Cons Of Cloning
Over the years, science and technology have expanded to make it possible to create identical creatures. While new cloning technology is a great advancement, it raises a plethora of moral and ethical questions. Cloning may bring about new ways to find cures for babies, according to Philip M. Boffey, but cloning also “could usher in a new eugenics”. The problems produced from the prospect of cloning greatly outweigh the benefits. One of the main issues that cloning brings about is whether or not people will take advantage of this new technology. For instance, Lewis Thomas wonders if “the rich and powerful but socially objectionable” or the “governments of dumb, docile masses” will misuse the technology. These seemingly important people may be able to give themselves a “version of immortality”. Just because the ability to clone exists does not mean that valuable people should be able to multiply themselves. No one on Earth is exactly the same for a reason, and it should stay that way. If there were to be several hundred Paris Hiltons or Kim Kardashians walking around, the world would be a pretty terrifying place. People should remain unique, separate from the “precise sameness” that Thomas …show more content…
Researches and scientists may use cloned embryos to find cures for diseases. However, according to Boffey, the “risk that a cloned baby would be born with birth defects or face medical problems”is extremely high. It goes against all ethics to produce children that may be disabled for their whole lives. The idea of cloning children for the sole purpose of finding cures is similar to the idea of having children for the sole purpose of helping cure an older sibling. Both of these concepts involve selfishly bringing a child into the world and possibly ruining his life. These scientific ideas go against moral and ethical codes and will “turn children into manufactured products rather than independent

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    A second set of ethical problems involves clearly separating thera- peutic from reproductive cloning. Because the techniques involved with therapeutic cloning are the same techniques that would be involved in reproductive cloning, opponents of the latter might argue that no thera- peutic cloning should be permitted because it will inevitably lead to re- productive cloning. The fear is that once cloned human embryos are created in the laboratory, there will be no way to stop scientists or phy- sicians from acceding to a person's request to have the cloned embryos…

    • 102 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Ever since the birth of the first cloned sheep, named Dolly, the dream of human cloning has existed (Van Dijck, 1999). Cloning a mammal is described as the manipulation of an animal or human cell in order to create an identical copy of that animal’s or human’s nucleic DNA (Andrews, 1997). Though the dream of a human clone also comes with a lot of controversy regarding ethics and morals. Embryotic stem cell research, which could lead to a renewable source of human tissue, cells and eventually entire organs (Bowring, 2004), is highly controversial due to the necessity of placing a cloned embryo into a woman’s body in order to achieve that research. Politicians differentiate between therapeutic cloning and reproductive cloning as they refer to the second as “implanting a cloned embryo in a woman's womb” (Bowring, 2004), as for the embryo itself the research is not very therapeutic. Furthermore cloning by transfer of nuclei is not very effective yet as only 1% of manipulated sheep eggs reach adulthood and the number is even lower for other animals (Solter, 2000). The question whether human cloning will ever be possible and ethical remains to be answered but it seems certain that extra research in embryotic stem cells will improve techniques and success rates, which eventually brings the realization of a human clone closer one step at a time.…

    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    As revealed earlier, cloning humans has a high failure rate, because there are many barriers put in by nature to prevent an “unnatural” event from occurring. These barriers can happen anytime during the cloning process. For example, the enucleated egg might not be compatible with the donor nucleus, the newly transferred nucleus may not grow and develop properly, the step where the embryo is implanted into the surrogate could fail, or the pregnancy may fail. Even if the pregnancy succeeds, there is no guarantee that the clone will act like a clone unless the right genes are activated. In a transferred human cloning, the scientist has to re-program the nucleus and force it to pretend as if it belongs in an early embryonic stage. If the nucleus is not programmed properly or completely, the embryo will more than likely become abnormal or die. Now, if the embryo manages to pass all of the post-zygotic barriers, “there is a possibility that the [fully developed] cloned individual might carry certain abnormalities…” causing them to live a shorter life span than expected (Wickman). There are also other concerns, besides health-related, such moral issues. The ability to clone individuals could lead to an out-of-control situation created by someone who wants to create an army of genetic replicas by abusing the new…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Couples who are battling with infertility can benefit from human cloning. By having a cloned cell implanted into a mother’s uterus, she can possibly have a child that she could not have had through natural procreation. Human cloning can give infertile couples a biological child who received genes from one or both parents. Those who are advocates for reproductive cloning generally give three reasons: The goodness of human freedom, existence, and well-being. People believe that human cloning for reproduction purposes is not making themselves free, but that they are free to practice human cloning. They want to the ability to decide based on their own moral values what is right and wrong with having a cloned child. The goodness of existence has people advocating for the potential cloned child. People argue that once the cloned child is born it would “prefer existence as a clone to no existence at all (PCBE).” No one can verify that the child would believe that statement once they are old enough to think for themselves. The final argument for human cloning is for the goodness of well-being. This argument is for using human cloning to help infertile couples to have a biological child. Other people argue that the well-being is to benefit the genetic quality of the next generation by ensuring that all diseases and disorders that the child may inherit are removed…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Let's just say if a clone survives birth and it’s childhood and had Large Offspring Syndrome, If all of the conditions like cardiomyopathy diabetes, high rates of heart and lung damage, kidney failure brain abnormalities etc. The animal in labor and the clone is give birth in a filthy Barn house. In that scenario the clone animal that is giving birth, percentage of life is one in million. Another reason that cloning should not be in society is the lack of diversity. “Cloning involves a process of creating identical genes. As such, there would be a lack of diversity in animalkind. Scientists believe this lack of diversity will lower the different animal race’s ability to adapt. Plus, there would be a lack of diversity in the world leading to everyone looking the same.…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “The issue should never be about the extinction of any animal, it should always be about the cruelty and exploitation which will lead to their extinction,” unknown. Each and every animal on earth has as much right to be here as you, me, and of all humanity. Scientists have found a way to clone extinct species. The thought of that sounds amazing and really exciting, but think about it another way. If we bring back no longer existing animals, us humans will do what we do best, which is changing nature and destroying it, basically killing them for money or being greedy for food. According to text “no,” there are already many living things becoming extinct many times faster than normal. Why would we worry about animals who are already long gone when there are many other things that are important to the environment that we need to care about? Another reason why we should not bring them back is because our Earth has changed significantly since they were alive. Having them back would change many things. Lastly, education costs lots of money.…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ethics Of Cloning

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Be that as it may, we have no privilege to pick and pick our hereditary legacy. What alarms many individuals who are worried about cloning is that cloning can make a specific sort of human. The dependence on control the hereditary qualities or attributes of one's posterity coordinates to the moral issue. The ethical issue with conceptive cloning lies not in its abiogenetic character, but rather in its ambush on the comprehension of kids as endowments as opposed to belonging, or activities of our will, or vehicles for our satisfaction. The issue is not that guardians usurp the self-rule of the kid they outline: it is not as though the youngster could some way or another pick her sex, stature, and eye shading for herself. The issue lies in the hubris of the planning guardians, in their drive to ace the secret of birth. Some contradict cloning for any reason since they consider the fetus to constitute a full individual or if nothing else early human life, and think of it as unethical under any conditions to make a developing life exclusively as a "way to some flip side," especially when that requires the annihilation of the incipient…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the past few years, human cloning has gone from a laboratory fantasy to a global debate. There are many arguments supporting both negative and positive effects of human cloning. According to BBC News religious leaders have said that Cloning is unethical and even a crime against God including The Catholic Pope John Paul II has condemned the Cloning research (Willey). Will human cloning be a great step for man, or will it lead to moral abyss? This question is asked all the time. With great research one would realize that with the implementation of human cloning, there would be a huge medical and non-medical advancement. Humanity could cure multitude of diseases and ailments, people with single and infertile parents could have children, and certain species could be saved from extinction. In contrast to all the positives of human cloning, there are many religious leaders, human rights activist and the misinformed masses that are against the advancement of cloning.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The development and the success of animal cloning has raised concerns of human experimentation and the implementation of cloning human embryos. The World Health Organization has expressed its opinion that human cloning is unethical as well as the National Bioethics Advisory Commission.…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It has been argued that human cloning is unethical and would be deleterious to human race. People know that the technology is unsafe. As we can see from the study of Dolly [a female sheep remarkable in being the first mammal to be cloned], it shows that there are many embryos and new born die before it was successfully cloned. Also, Dolly had a very short life. If human clones survived, they are not guaranteed that they would develop normally or not suffer from premature ageing as a result of their elderly genes. To a certain extent they are right. However, human cloning may bring such a great benefit to mankind. We could find better way of treatments, and perhaps cures for many diseases that so many of us suffer and die from each year like AIDS. There are millions of people die from this illness and the way of treatment for this illness has not been found yet. But with cloning, we could copy and produce more white blood cells to defend and kill the virus. This would save millions of innocent lives. Moreover, with the cloning, we would have organs for people who suffer from illness for examples, people who get infected from cancer. These mean that clones would be the best organ donors since the clone is an…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, if clone one human being there will most likely be technological abuse. Such as people cloning to many people and wanting to keep them to use them to do things (Wickman). Second, with the powerful leaders today, there will be a huge abuse of technology also because they think they will be more powerful if they clone more people (Dixon). Third, even when people put the ethics to the side, there is a large amount of resources needed to clone a human being such as all the eggs that will be needed (Rettner). Fourth, a clone would have a loss of individuality such as common sense ("Pros and Cons of Human Cloning"). Fifth, there is a very high chance that clones will be seen differently in society such as their rights. Sixth, people believe that people are playing with God’s rules when cloning a human being. Seventh, if scientists clone an offspring, that clone will have or lead to problems with blood. Last, A gene will stay the same age as the person cloned, so it would be like cloning a 40-year-old and putting it into a newborn baby’s body. The is because the newborn baby would have the same genes (Wickman). This is the second reason why human cloning should be…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    United States. National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Cloning Human Beings: Report and Recommendation of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Washington: GPO, 1997.…

    • 2001 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are many ways in which human cloning is expected to benefit mankind. The first advantage is rejuvenation which means reversing the aging process. A second advantage, scientist may be able to treat heart attack victim by cloning their healthy heart cells. Heart disease is the number one killer in several industrialized countries. The third advantage is the embryos can be grown to produce organs or tissues to repair or replace damaged ones. So people won't be difficulty to find compatible organs. One other advantage is about infertility, with cloning infertile couples could have children. Lots of couples around the world are troubled with this complaint. Couples go through physically and emotionally painful procedures for a small chance of having children. Currently interfile treatments are less than 10 percent…

    • 914 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    At first, human cloning is obviously ethical when helping hopeless victims to overcome the pangs or, at least, giving them a motivation to keep living, or even making them happier. Ethics or not ethics usually depends on how to approach the matter. In some situation, the mostly right things are inappropriate. For instance, a couple that had been married for three years was in a terrible car accident; the husband would be a vegetable the rest of his life and obviously could not take part in the reproduction of children. For the wife, the only way that she will ever have children is human cloning. Is it fair or ethical if she must live lonely the rest of her life without a son or daughter from her love husbands, or if she only gets kids in accepted ways with a strange man? Moreover, Smith says “A child has right to be better than its parents.” In another word, human cloning technology can give our children better lives such as to live longer with resistance to cancer, heart disease, any familial diseases, and all the other problems. In contrast, some skeptical people doubt that cloning would harm society because fewer people get married. In addition, they also criticize that children may not receive…

    • 1633 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    A big problem lies in the social rejection of clones. As the strongest reason in support of cloning is its capability to holdup in case of organ failures, the world may see clones as an ordinary organ carriers and not as fellow human beings. The clones may always be considered as second class people because they were only conveyed into the world with the determination of helping the already existing people. (A.Robinsons, 2001) The difficulty of social acceptance may not only be proper for clones, but it may happen to a naturally born person too. There might develop cases when the human being may not have the wanted features, and since formation of perfect people is possible, the original human being may be refused…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics