Preview

The Moral Implications of Cloning

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2001 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Moral Implications of Cloning
Outside the lab where the cloning had actually taken place, most of us thought it could never happen. Oh we would say that perhaps at some point in the distant future, cloning might become feasible through the use of sophisticated biotechnologies far beyond those available to us now. But what we really believed, deep in our hearts, was that this one biological feat we could never master. Dr. Lee M. Silver, 1997. On February 23, 1997, Doctor Ian Wilmut successfully cloned the world's first mammal, giving the world a harsh wake-up call to the state of its technology. The implications of an effective somatic cell nuclear transfer in mammals are tremendous. The use of cloning for research purposes could yield fixes for aging and heart problems; new organs for patients in need of transplants; increased reliability of plastic, reconstructive, and cosmetic surgery; the extinction of Down's syndrome and Tay-Sachs disease; and the cure for cancer (Human). The applications of the research of cell development are already witnessed in the invention of fabricated skin, cartilage, bone, and ligament and tendons. In fact, cloning is only a result of many years of research. In 1965, Dr. Marshall R. Urist of the University of California discovered that powdered bone, when combined with the isolated bone morphogenetic proteins and DNA sequences, would create new bone when placed in a bone fracture ("Tissue", 47). However, fears of this new procedure are certainly well justified. A cloned child for instance, would lose all sense of individuality, and the potential harm (which first must be downsized to an acceptable degree before full production could commence), at this point, greatly outweighs the beneficial yields (United, 66, 65). Plus, given the option to choose features in a prospective clone child, or "designer child", procreating would be more feasibly compared with car shopping than reproduction (Silver, 277). These factors contribute to the controversial


Cited: Page "Cloning". Encyclopedia Britannica. 15th edition, volume 3. Chicago, IL. 1997. Human Cloning Foundation. "The Benefits of Human Cloning". "http://www.humancloning.org/benefits.htm). 1998. "Ian Wilmut, Dolly 's Creator, on the Ethics of Cloning". The American Enterprise. September/October 1998: 57-58. WilsonSelect. FirstSearch. Lake-Sumter Community College Lib., Lessburg, FL. 05 Nov 1999 (http://www.ccla.lib.fl.us/firstsearch). Silver, Lee M. Remarking Eden: Cloning and Beyond in a Brave New World. Avon Books. New York, NY. 1997. "Tissues Creation". Scientific American. Scientific American, Inc. Pages 54-55. New York, NY. 1999. United States. National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Cloning Human Beings: Report and Recommendation of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Washington: GPO, 1997.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    It has been suggested my some that “America is likely to be the most important battle ground” when it comes to the debate of human cloning and allowing further research to be done (Bottum and Kristol). This statement is taken into account due to the outstanding fact that the United States’ biotechnology industry is one of the most highly advanced in the world. The pressure from several scientists who are seeking to reach the medical breakthrough is extensive. The U.S. is also frequently amongst the greatest supporter of therapeutic cloning (Solter &Gearheart).…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    References: Andrews, L.B. 1997. Is there a right to clone? Constitutional challenges to bans on human cloning. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology. 11(3): 647-676.…

    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    J. (2015). Cloning humans? Biological, ethical, and social considerations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(29), 8879-8886. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1501798112…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the years, science and technology have expanded to make it possible to create identical creatures. While new cloning technology is a great advancement, it raises a plethora of moral and ethical questions. Cloning may bring about new ways to find cures for babies, according to Philip M. Boffey, but cloning also “could usher in a new eugenics”. The problems produced from the prospect of cloning greatly outweigh the benefits.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The general consensus of human cloning is generally faced with disgust. The public opinion of cloning is generally unpopular and is not faced favorably. Because of the unpopular opinion of cloning, there is not much pressure from opposition to allow cloning. It is believed that once science evolved to the point where scientists could successfully engineer an offspring that was perfect and designed by a “parent”, the public opinion of cloning might change. With the public opinion of cloning changed, it may spell certain disaster for the human race. Kass believes this is a possibility because of the mindset of society today. With the instant gratification attitude of society, people are more apt to custom design a child rather that conceiving a child “the old fashioned way”. Kass sees that this…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cloning is a procedure conceived to notion in the late 1960s, but it is only recently that it was fully understood and that scientists have started to figure out how to successfully copy the genetic composition of one organism to another. Since science already knows how to do this, the only problems and obstacles that remains is efficiency and the success ratio of each operation. The cloning process consists of taking the nucleus of an organism, and placing it, along with the DNA that contains all the genetic material, in place of the nucleus of the host egg. The egg then forms an embryo and matures into the same exact "copy", at least genetically, as the original organism. Already done on mammals, cloning is something that can be extended to utilize humans as subjects. In the future it will be wholly possible to create human clones to serve whatever purpose they were conceived for. However, presently there are numerous ethical issues surrounding cloning and there are problems about the implications of the use of cloning for the purpose of medicine. This issue plagues us so much that the constant objections of bioethicists and political and religious leaders have caused the US Government to propose a ban on all research concerning human cloning until a conclusion is reached on the moral and ethical aspects of the process. (Macer, 2)…

    • 1585 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Macklin, R., “Why We Should Regulate—But Not Ban—the Cloning of Human Beings,” Testimony presented to the National Bioethics Advisory Commission, March 14, 1997. Macklin, R., "Splitting embryos on the slippery slope: Ethics and public policy," Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 4: 209-226, 1994. Mill, J.S., On Liberty (Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill Publishing, 1859). National Institutes of Health, Report of the Human Embryo Research Panel (Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, 1994). Nussbaum, M.C., “Aristotelian social democracy,” inLiberalism and the Good 203, R. Bruce Douglass, et al., (eds.), pp. 217-226, 1990. Parfit, D., Reasons and Persons (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984). Posner, R, Sex and Reason (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992). Radin, M., “Reflections on Objectification,”65 Southern California Law Review 341 (November 1991). Radin, M., “The Colin Ruagh Thomas O 'Fallon Memorial Lecture on Personhood,” 74 Oregon Law Review 423 (Summer 1995). Rhodes, R. "Clones, harms, and rights,"Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4:285-290, 1995. Robertson, J.A., "A Ban on Cloning and Cloning Research is Unjustified," Testimony Presented to the National Bioethics Advisory Commission, March 14, 1997. Robertson, J.A., "The question of human cloning,"Hastings Center Report 24:6-14, 1994. Robertson, “The scientist’s right to research: A constitutional analysis,51 Southern California Law Review 1203, 1977. Rothenberg, K., Testimony before the Senate Committee on Labor and Human Resources, March 12, 1997. Schwartz, H., The Culture of Copy (New York: Zone Books, 1996).…

    • 11085 Words
    • 45 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Against Stem Cell Research

    • 1833 Words
    • 8 Pages

    "Human Cloning & Bioethics - Reason Why People Object?." HubPages. HubPages, 16 06 2011. Web. 2 Feb 2013. .…

    • 1833 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Human Cloning

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages

    John A. Robertson, "Human Cloning and the Challenge of Regulation," The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 339, no. 2 (July 9, 1998), pp. 119-122.…

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    <br><li>National Bioethics Advisory Commission. "Cloning Human Beings." [Online] Available <a href="http://bioethics.gov/pubs.html">http://bioethics.gov/pubs.html</a>. September 24, 1998. Price, Joyce.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Therapeutic cloning, using Somatic-Cell Nuclear Transfer (SCNT), is the process of harvesting embryotic stem cells for medical purposes, such as cloning new organs for someone in need of a replacement. For example, if a person’s liver fails, therapeutic cloning will allow a new liver to be developed and transplanted into the patient. Since the organ will be composed majorly of the patient’s cells, the chances of the body rejecting the organ is unlikely, this technology will potentially save millions of lives. Reproductive cloning is the process of using an organism’s cells and creating another duplicate organism. The first step of this cloning also uses Somatic-Cell Nuclear Transfer (SCNT). Using this technology, endangered animals, such as the Siberian tiger would be able to strive on as a living species for many more years than predicted. Reproductive cloning will allow reproduction to be much simpler and quicker. Many couples have to deal with the dreadful reality of the woman not being fertile and able to conceive. Reproductive cloning would eliminate this problem because it would mean that the couple will be able to have a child that is directly related to one of the parents.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Starting with an explanation of what cloning is and the two main types of the technology: reproductive cloning and therapeutic cloning, this paper goes on to explore the ramifications these technologies may have in different areas of our society with respect to government, funding issues for research, religious views, education for our children on cloning issues and lastly the publics response to cloned animal produce.…

    • 1913 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Satire On Cloning

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For many years, scientists have been experimenting in the field of cloning. Cloning uses an egg cell and a somatic cell to make a duplicate copy of the organism. It is currently a highly controversial topic in the scientific world. Many people can benefit from cloning. From farmers to patients, not only does cloning help scientists discover more about genetics, it will also help a lot of people. However, there are also ethical issues with cloning, such as the use of embryonic stem cells and cross-species hybrids. For instance, at the Salk institute, a human-pig embryo was recently made and destroyed. The purpose of the experiment was to see if human organs could be grown inside a pig. The authors believe that we are still far off from accomplishing cloning of human organs in animals. I believe that cloning will help this world, but there needs to be restrictions on human cloning and cross-breeding.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this two-part viewpoint, David A. Prentice and William Saunders discuss the science and the ethics of therapeutic cloning. In the first part, Prentice argues that creating clones for the purpose of embryonic stem cell research, called "therapeutic cloning," is no different from reproductive cloning, which creates a living human child. Also, he points out, therapeutic cloning is not therapeutic for the embryo. In the second part of the viewpoint, Saunders builds on Prentice's argument and goes even…

    • 3138 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should Cloning Be Banned

    • 604 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The final argument against the banning of cloning is that it allows individuals or couples to reproduces through means other than sexual reproduction. Infertile couples could benefit from human cloning in that the couple could create a genetic duplicate of one of the parents. Further research even…

    • 604 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays