Preview

Right to Counsel

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1415 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Right to Counsel
Right to Counsel
CJA/364
October 9, 2011

Right to Counsel
Every individual is afforded the right to counsel in criminal proceedings. It is the liability of the government to provide every defendant facing criminal charges with legal representation that also is considered sufficient (2011). The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees every individual the right to a swift and public trial from an unbiased jury of his or her peers in the state or district in which the crime was committed in (1995-2011). The district should have been beforehand established by law, and to be educated of the nature and reason for the charge, the right to face the eyewitness in opposition of him or her, to have necessary process for gathering eyewitnesses in his or her support (1995-2011). Last, the Sixth Amendment affords and individual the right to have the aid of an attorney for his or her defense (1995-2011). The last statement of the Sixth Amendments establishes that every individual has a right to counsel from the very second he or she is placed in police confinement (2011).
The judgments of the U.S. Supreme Court also indicates that the Right to Counsel be provided to any individual who is insolvent or penniless and that the individual is guaranteed the right to the attendance of a court-appointed counsel at a crucial point in the criminal trial (2011). The crucial points of these proceedings are composed of custodial questioning, pre-charge lineups, preliminary examinations, arraignment, trial, punishment, and the first appeal of guilty verdict (2011). The Right to Counsel was initiated as a response to the English custom of refusing the aid of counsel in severe criminal proceedings that forces individuals to be present in court and represent his or herself in his or her own words (2011). An example of the strictness of the practice to deny counsel is evident in the trial of Mary Stuart, Queen of Scots in 1568 (2011). Queen Mary was indicted for



References: Right to Counsel 2011 http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/right+to+counsel Retrieved October 9, The Exclusionary Rule January 16, 1999 The United States Constitution 1995-2011 U.S. Constitution Online http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html#Am1 Retrieved October 9, 2011 Self Representation 2004-2011 http://supreme.justia.com/constitution/amendment-06/16-self-representation.html Retrieved October 9, 2011 Preamble: A Lawyer’s Responsibilites 1995-1999 Touch N’ Go Systems http://touchngo.com/lglcntr/ctrules/profcon/profcon.htm Retrieved October 9, 2011 National Committee on the Right to Counsel 2011 National Legal Aid and Defender Associaton http://www.nlada.org/Defender/Defender_Kit/NCRC Retrieved October 9, 2011

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    6th Amendment guarantees you a speedy trail, an impartial jury, that the accused can comfort the witnesses against them, and must be allowed a…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alabama, and overruled Betts v. Brady, which allowed selective application of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel to the states, itself previously binding only in federal cases. Instead, the court held that the right to the assistance of counsel was a fundamental right, essential for a fair trial, thereby emphasizing the procedural safeguards which were needed for due process of law. In this sense, the court ruled specifically that no one, regardless of wealth, education or class, should be charged with a crime and then be forced to face his accusers in court without the guidance of counsel. All of the other justices concurred in the judgment.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Prepare a 1,050- to 1,400- word paper in which you analyze the aspect(s) of right to council. Examine the development of right to council and when the right to council attaches to criminal procedure, as well as the right to self-representation. Additionally, be sure to define the role of attorneys in the criminal justice system as it applies to right to council.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Constitutional Rights Enforceable Under § 1983 23 Reputational Harm 24 Failure to Protect from 3rd Parties 25 State of Mind in Constitutional Torts 26 Procedural Due Process Violations 27 Substantive Due Process Violations 28 Non-Constitutional Rights Enforceable under § 1983 29 § 1983 and Implied Private Rights of Action 31 Damages 32 Compensatory Damages 32 Punitive Damages 33 Punitive Damages for Municipalities 34 Attorney’s Fees 35 Identifying a Prevailing Party 36 Administrative Success 36 Nominal Damages 36 Catalyst Theory 36 Determining Fee Awards 37 Multiple Claims 38 Reasonable Rates 39 Contingent Fees 39 Administrative Proceedings 39 Risk Enhancement 39 Attorney’s Fees & Settlement Negotiations 41 Fee Waivers 41 Rule 68 41 Administration of the Civil Rights Acts: Intersections of State and Federal Law 42 § 1983, Habeas Corpus, and Res Judicata 42 Additional Reconstruction Litigation 47 § 1982 – Freedom of Property 48 § 1981 – Freedom to Contract 49 Structural Reform Litigation 50…

    • 29388 Words
    • 118 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Amendment Six: Case Study

    • 1701 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The first clause of Amendment Six is the speedy trial clause. There are several reasons that this clause is positive to the accused in a case on trial. Primarily the right to a speedy trial can prevent undue and oppression, and minimize the anxiety and concern that accompanies public accusation. A speedy trial can limit the possibility that long delay will impair the ability of an accused to defend himself. Furthermore, delaying a trial is can tamper with the evidence and witnesses because over time evidence can lose value and witnesses could forget what happened at the the crime scene or even die before the trial takes place. The right of a speedy trial can also be in opposition to the interests of the accused because it can cause the accused…

    • 1701 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The question before the Court regarded the right to legal counsel guaranteed by the 6th Amendment, and how that right was applied to the States by the 14th Amendment. Must States provide counsel to citizens who cannot afford an attorney? Could a citizen be sentenced to death without benefit of counsel? Was the right to counsel so fundamental that the trial could not be fair without an attorney being provided? Was the right to counsel guaranteed in State…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Alabama are a clear statement of the importance of the defendant’s right to counsel in a criminal proceeding. The right to counsel has been the source of much controversy within the U.S. law over the past decades. However, in the light of the words of Justice Sutherland, the failure of the trial court to appoint counsel was found a denial of due process. The Powell case holding declared that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment required that state courts give defendants an opportunity to obtain counsel for defendants in all capital cases who are not able to afford one and an attorney free of charge in noncapital…

    • 1666 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This paper explores what I think is the constitutional flaw of our criminal justice system, attorney-client privilege. Under certain circumstances, information possessed by an attorney cannot be disclosed to others without the client 's consent because of the attorney-client privilege or certain other legal concepts. The attorney-client privilege, which dates back to the reign of Elizabeth I, was originally based on the concept that an attorney should not be required to testify against the client and, thereby, violate a duty of loyalty owed to the client. At that…

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gideon V Wainwright Case

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the 16th and 17th century, the law did not allow or provide for the use of attorneys in any court case, except for treason cases. It wasn’t until the 18th century in which the defendants were allowed to have an attorney. The constitution allowed for the use of attorneys, but most defendants represented themselves, while…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Juror's Arguement Analysis

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This Sixth Amendment of the Bill of Rights protects the rights of the accused in criminal prosecutions. Not only does this amendment provide the right to a speedy trial, the right to confront witnesses against him, the right to counsel, this amendment provides the right to be tried by an impartial jury of his peers. While the trial takes place, it is the responsibility of the jury to listen and retain facts and evidence presented by the prosecution and the defense. It is their duty to determine guilt or innocence based solely on the facts and evidence presented during trial. If a guilty verdict is unanimously concluded amongst the 12 or more jurors, this must be concluded beyond a reasonable doubt. It only takes one juror to dissent…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The judicial branch is responsible for overseeing the local, state, and federal court systems. It explains the meaning of the Constitution and laws passed by the legislative branch and enforced by the executive branch. Now the Supreme Court is ahead of the judicial branch because it is the highest court of the land. The Supreme Court rules if whether or not the issue itself is constitutional. (Dictionary, 2013)…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Right to Counsel Paper

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To understand the Right to counsel one must understand the when it and how long ago it began. In the 16th and 17th century’s Criminal Defense attorneys were actually banned from certain criminal cases which prevented people from proper rights and justice. Later in the 17th century Criminal Defense attorneys began to be allowed in treason cases (which previously were not), by the 18th century almost all criminal cases could have a defense attorney. The reasoning behind these changes was due to the Amendments of the Constitution as well and ratification of some of these Amendments I will discuss later in this paper. The Amendments of our Constitution focus highly on fundamental Rights which safe-guard us against federal and state actions giving us a right to the Due Process of Law. Included in these rights were a suspect accused of a crime was aloud a right to counsel aid during interrogations and Criminal Prosecutions. Under the Fourteenth Amendment it is a violation to convict a defendant without a counsel aid which violates those individuals’ rights. The purpose and reasoning behind these rights of counsel aid is to lead to a fair trial.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Right to Counsel

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In the early founding of this country, the colonies used common law brought over from England which prevented serious offenders from obtaining counsel even at their own expense (Right to Counsel Clause). Some attorneys, out of the kindness of their heart and others for self-serving purposes, would lend their services freely and other times the public would pay. This pattern continued until the Revolutionary war at which time the practice of hiring one’s own representation was well practiced. The right of counsel was secured in the Sixth Amendment.…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Essay On Jury Trial

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The US Constitution grants citizens the right to trial by a jury of your peers. In other words, it grants citizens the right to be judged by average ordinary rather than by lawyers or judges.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal Rights During Trial

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Legal rights during a trial can be very important to the defendant in a case. These rights provide a lot of different options so that they can have their own choices about the case. All of these rights are in the 6th amendment to help the defendant in trial. I am going to discuss to you 4 of 8 different right for a defendant. The four I am going to be discussing are as follows, the right to confront witnesses, the right to counsel at trial, the right to a speedy trial, and the right to a public trial.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays