Preview

Right to Counsel

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1808 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Right to Counsel
THE RIGHT TO COUNSEL

The right to counsel is guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution. It provides for counsel in phases of a criminal proceeding for anyone who cannot afford one. This wasn’t always the case. Early colonial days did not allow defendants the opportunity to hire their own attorney nor was one appointed. This right has been earned in incremental stages involving several precedent cases. Those cases include Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 (1932), Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 (1938), Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963), Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 321 (1972), and United States v. Wade, 388 U. S. 218 (1967). Today, counsel is guaranteed in all phases of critical pretrial events. Counsel is also guaranteed during post-trial sentencing procedures and in a first appeal to a conviction ensuring the presence, expert advice, and assistance at all stages of a prosecution (Kanovitz, 2010, p. 409).
In the early founding of this country, the colonies used common law brought over from England which prevented serious offenders from obtaining counsel even at their own expense (Right to Counsel Clause). Some attorneys, out of the kindness of their heart and others for self-serving purposes, would lend their services freely and other times the public would pay. This pattern continued until the Revolutionary war at which time the practice of hiring one’s own representation was well practiced. The right of counsel was secured in the Sixth Amendment.
The Sixth Amendment gave the right to counsel but only people who could afford an attorney could hire one. Thus, a large population of people was left to defend themselves at a great disadvantage for many of them were uneducated or had other issues that prevented them from getting a fair trial. The first major incremental case to impact the right to counsel was Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 (1932). In Powell, the court recognized that poor and illiterates were not receiving a



References: Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25 (1972). Kanovitz, J.R. (2010). Constitutional law (12thed.). New Providence, NJ: LexisNexis/Matthew Bender. Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963). Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 (1938). Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 (1932). Right to Counsel Clause(2010). Revolutionary War and Beyond. Accessed on 21 February 2012 at http://www.revolutionary-war-and-beyond.com/right-to- counsel-clause.html United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 (1967).

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    McWilliams V Dunn Supreme Court of the United States Introduction The Dunn v. McWilliams case is a famous court case that was heard before the supreme court of United States in April 24, 2017. The case involved James McWilliams as the petitioner against Jefferson Dunn was the commissioner and was representing the Alabama department of corrections. The focus of the case was the sixth amendment of the US constitution was useful in providing for the right to the assistance of an attorney to represent them in defense. However the oral arguments in the case pointed out that it was unclear on whether the defendant’s right to an attorney allows for him to an independent expert who would be devoted in advocating specifically for the defense’s case.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Court held that the Sixth Amendment’s guarantee of counsel is a fundamental right essential to a fair trial and, as such, applies the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In overturning Betts, Justice Black stated that “reason and reflection require us to recognize that in our adversary system of criminal justice, any person brought into court, who is too poor to hire a lawyer, can’t be assured a fair trial unless counsel is provided for him.” He further wrote that the “noble ideal” of “fair trials before impartial tribunals in which ever defendant stands equal before the law, can’t be realized if the poor man charged with crime has to face his accusers without a lawyer to assist him.”…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zero Tolerance Case Study

    • 1984 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Judge Civarelli denied juveniles their constitutional right of the 6th amendment: right to counsel. He claims that only once did he deny the right to counsel to a juvenile and the rest, if requested, could have asked for counsel and they would have placed the case in a continuance. As we see in the…

    • 1984 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Alabama are a clear statement of the importance of the defendant’s right to counsel in a criminal proceeding. The right to counsel has been the source of much controversy within the U.S. law over the past decades. However, in the light of the words of Justice Sutherland, the failure of the trial court to appoint counsel was found a denial of due process. The Powell case holding declared that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment required that state courts give defendants an opportunity to obtain counsel for defendants in all capital cases who are not able to afford one and an attorney free of charge in noncapital…

    • 1666 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is a reason the U.S. Supreme Court Justices tend to quote Dickens frequently in their opinions: he usually some good points about the law. When it comes to legal fees, Dickens often pontificated as to whether it was ever possible to have a fair trial when money determined the quality of representation. Two hundred years later and on the opposite side of the Atlantic, this issue is still ripe for debate because regardless of all the services available; social equality in the law does not exist - particularly when it comes to the mentally ill or disabled. This paper will discuss the ethical issues surrounding legal fees, examine the options for representation available, and touch upon how this affects the mentally ill or disabled - a group…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gideon V Wainwright Case

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Sixth Amendment of the Constitution of the United Sates gives the right of any United States citizen accused of crimes the right to counsel in criminal procedure and their defense. To understand this process, one must understand the developments for the right to counsel, self-representation, and the roles of an attorney and when the right to counsel is attached.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Right To Lasnik Case

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Our justice system is one of the things I admire most about american government. The sixth amendment ensures American citizens in all criminal prosecutions the right to a speedy and public trial, the right to trial by jury, and the right to legal counsel. Without the sixth amendment our justice system would not be very just because those accused of a crime would not have sufficient legal protection. this would impact my life and the lives of all Americans.…

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Creation of U.S. Laws

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Thorpe, M. (2012). U.S. Law and the History of English Common Law. Retrieved from http://www.godlessgeeks.com/LINKS/CommonLaw.htm…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Story, Joseph. Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States: With a Preliminary Review of the Constitutional History of the Colonies and States, Before the Adoption of the Constitution. Union, N.J.: Lawbook Exchange, 2001.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Sixth Amendment is a part of the Bill of Rights which consist of the first ten amendments that gives citizens’ rights and privileges. “The Sixth Amendment was introduced as a part of the Bill of Rights into the United States Constitution on September 5, 1789 and was voted for by 9 out of 12 states on December 15, 1791” (Laws, 2013). James Madison implemented the Sixth Amendment into the Bill of Rights. The Sixth Amendment was created to protect the basic rights of the accused. In earlier years, kings and churches would abuse their power and accuse people of crimes that they did not commit to get the person to go away. The Sixth Amendment was founded by the founding fathers, who rebelled against the treatment that they received by the British in matters of crime and justice, so they felt that not only should the…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The reason prosecutors support the need for effective defense attorneys when they are adversaries in the courtroom is because the purpose isn’t to put innocent people in jail. The purpose is to have a fair trial without any mistakes. As stated in the legal briefing (BRIEF OF JANET F. RENO, et al., AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER) (p. 9), “Providing effective representation at the outset of a case will significantly reduce the amount of resources that must be expended in capital cases.” This will help save time, money, and in some cases a life.…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When suspects are facing trial they can defend themselves, hire an attorney, or have one appointed by the state. Having a lawyer can help because they have training in defending their clients. This right also protects the poor suspects who can not afford a lawyer to represent them. The people that can not afford one can choose to have a lawyer or to represent themselves. It is a good idea to have a lawyer because he will be best fit to defend someone because of his experience and practice.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    References: Congress (1776) The Declaration of Independence, Choices: About Freedom and Justice Concepts, (pp 81 -85), Pearson Custom Publishing (2008) Boston, MA.…

    • 2461 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Right To Counsel

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During the Preliminary hearing, a lawyer is required, but the placement of the grand jury does not require counsel at all. During this time its best to understand the nature of the crime and what actually happened. During the arraignment and interrogation a lawyer is both required and recommended. During this time the defendant has the opportunity to sit and talk with the lawyer and possibly discuss a plea bargain that can be offered. Although you may have to go through a line up in order to help prove guilt or innocence no lawyer is required to be present if you do not have one already hired in your defense before the indictment. A lawyer however is require for a line up post indictment. The next three steps in the criminal justice process will be the plea bargaining, in which negotiagiations are made to the best of the counsels ability. Trial, in which gives the defendant…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Defence Attorney Example

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On your trial date there were also multiple violations to the constitution. By having the jury consist of six department store executives and six students you failed the 6th amendment was not considered. The 6th amendment calls for an impartial jury of the state. The 4th amendment was violated when the merchandise found in your house was used in court. The 4th amendment states that evidence gained as the result of an unlawful search or seizure cannot be used at the court trial of the person from who is was seized. When Mr. Greenberg got you to be retried and later found guilty the 5th amendment should have prevented you from being tried on the same offence twice. The 8th amendment didn’t protect you from excessive fines or…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays