Preview

Persuasive Essay On Miranda Rights

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
770 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Persuasive Essay On Miranda Rights
The rights you are read while being placed under arrest are the Miranda rights. They state that what you say will be used against you in court and that you have the right to an attorney. These rights are read to protect your freedom and to inform you of your constitutional rights. It became procedure to state the rights after the Miranda vs. Arizona case. Ernesto Miranda was sentenced to 20-30 years in prison for counts of kidnapping and rape. In court, Miranda argued that he did not know his rights and that they should have been told to him. He is the reason that criminal suspects receive more justice from police officers.

There is an enormous amount of bad reputations for police these days. Some have been shown
…show more content…
We should be allowed the rights to fair trials. The trials we undergo in a court of law can drastically affect our lives. We are allowed the right to an attorney that we can pay or be appointed. We also have a right to a jury of our peers to ensure that there is no bias in deciding guilt or innocence. Also, during interrogation we have the right to not self incriminate ourselves. We don't have answer, write, or confess anything against our will. We have these rights in the U.S constitution, but they are restated when we are read our Miranda rights. This ensures that we will be treated fairly in questioning and in …show more content…
When suspects are facing trial they can defend themselves, hire an attorney, or have one appointed by the state. Having a lawyer can help because they have training in defending their clients. This right also protects the poor suspects who can not afford a lawyer to represent them. The people that can not afford one can choose to have a lawyer or to represent themselves. It is a good idea to have a lawyer because he will be best fit to defend someone because of his experience and practice.

In conclusion, The Miranda rights are truly more than words. They are our protection and warning. They help police do a good job, they protect our lives and our property, they protect us in questioning, and they protect us in trial. Ernesto Miranda may have been a bad criminal, but his failure to stay silent protects our freedom

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Reynold Lancaster discussed how the Miranda warning is used by police officers and other law enforcements when they arrest a person of interest. The Miranda warning allows the officers…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. The U.S. Supreme Court's ruling of Miranda v. Arizona set a precedence on how future suspects would be interrogated. It makes complete sense to advise a person that is being interrogated that he or she has a right to remain silent during interrogation and that he or she has the right to have counsel present during an interrogation. It's also important that the suspect be fully aware and full understand his or her rights before the interrogation begins. -WRITTEN AND INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION-METHODS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT By Harvey Wallace and Cliff Roberson(CHAPTER 9 PAGE 136)…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Miranda warning is a statement that informs individuals of their Fifth Amendment rights. It is needed anytime custodial interrogation takes place or when a person has been taken into custody or has otherwise been deprived of freedom. However, the Supreme Court has said that Miranda warnings are not constitutionally guaranteed, but rather they exist to aid in the protection of Fifth Amendment rights. So essentially, the purpose of Miranda warnings are only to decide on the admissibility of evidence in a court of law.…

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Over the years the Miranda rights are used to ensure justice and preserve liberty ever since the case Miranda v. Arizona. All though people may see the Miranda Rights/ warning as an act of not trying to ensure justice it is because if we didn't use them today then there would be many more cases like Miranda v. Arizona and lead to a corruptio in our police stations atound th…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Knowing and just being aware of ones right could be essential for the public. One has to know the basic differences between a probable cause and reasonable suspicion. An encounter with an officer and a possible violation of the law it helps to know the cause so one can be prepared for a possible defense strategy. Warrants have certain requirements and exceptions’, knowing each one is vital. The Sixth Amendment is always used in trials and having knowledge of this amendment is important.…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cypop 5 Task 1 Legislation

    • 4661 Words
    • 19 Pages

    * Right to Liberty and Freedom- You have the right to be free and the state can only imprison you with very good reason – for example, if you are convicted of a crime. Anyone detained by the state must be brought before a court.…

    • 4661 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda Case Study

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ernesto Miranda, a mexican immigrant living in the United States, was arrested by officers Carroll Cooley and Wilfred Young at Miranda's home in Phoenix, AZ. He was put into custody and taken to a local police station. Miranda was put into police lineup and was identified by the witness, Lois Jameson. Following, Miranda was interrogated for two hours by two police officers with the Arizona police department, before making a written and signed confession of the crimes. This confession was presented at trial and Miranda was sentenced to 20-30 years in prison on each count of kidnapping and rape. The Supreme Court of Arizona found that Miranda's constitutional rights weren't personally violated, but ruled that police officers are required to…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Known as the “great writ of liberty” (Columbia electronic encyclopedia, 2011), it protects people from been held for a prolonged time and not been informed of the charges against them. The court has to document the illegal act and bring to the judge, the accused. It also gives us access to basic legal protection, like due process and counsel. (Levin-Waldman, O.M., 2012, p.255) With these rights the accused can be informed of his or her rights and can inform the judge of his or her guilt or innocence.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    First, individual liberties and freedoms are important since without them one can be held indefinitely. Habeas corpus also known as the “great writ of liberty” guarantees that a person who is being held unjustly can go free (Habeas corpus, 2011). This is one of the reasons that make America so great because anyone who is detained can know the reason why they are being held and in so are allowed due process under the law. The Constitution protects the…

    • 2236 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1966, as a result of the United States Supreme Court, Miranda v. Arizona established your “Miranda rights.” The Miranda rights are intended to protect an individual’s Fifth Amendment right to refuse to answer self incriminating questions.…

    • 64 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda V. Arizona

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The first court ruling where Miranda was found guilty to armed robbery was thrown out after his case was and brought up to the Supreme Court. In a ruling issued in 1966, the court established that the accused have the right to remain silent and that prosecutors may not use statements made by defendants while in police custody unless the police have informed them of their rights, which are now called Miranda Rights. Ernesto Miranda was not informed of his rights while in custody, therefore any confessions he made could not be used against him in court. At the Supreme Court level, the conviction was overthrown because he was not informed of his right against self incrimination and his right to remain silent. The case was later re-tried without using his confessions in the trial. Miranda was convicted on the basis of other evidence, and served 11 years for armed robbery. Although Miranda confessed to rape and kidnapping, he could not be prosecuted for it because there was not enough evidence to show he was the offender in those crimes once his confession was thrown out. Chief justice, Earl Warren established the…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Miranda Warnings

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages

    no. the miranda RIGHTS. protect our freedoms. without them we could end up a police state.In the United States, the Miranda warning is a warning given by police to criminal suspects in police custody, or in a custodial situation, before they are asked questions relating to the commission of a crime. A custodial situation is where the suspects freedom of movement is restrained although he is not under arrest. An incriminating statement by a suspect will not constitute admissible evidence unless the suspect was advised of his or her "Miranda rights" and made a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary waiver of those rights. However, police may request biographical information such…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal law by nature is interesting to most people. However, there are many citizens that misinterpret what their rights are in a court of law. For instance, the Fifth amendment is a person’s right to not self-incriminate. Defendants typically do not address the court directly. They do so through they attorney. Attorneys are “responsible for advising their clients of their right to testify, whether or not it is wise to do so, as ell as the strategic implications of that decision” (Stock, 2015, p. 712). Just because a defendant does not testify on their own behalf, should not presume guilt. The sixth amendment stipulates that a defendant has the right to an attorney and to a jury trial. This is the premise where miranda rights come into play.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Miranda Rights are an essential part of the United States judicial system. Without the right against self-incrimination, the prosecution would no longer bear the burden of proof in criminal court. They could simply ask: "Did you do it?" However, the article this week details the intense pressure of the interrogation room, regardless of whether physical tactics are used or not. It almost sounded like some confessions were coerced, though they clearly met the legal definition of a confession. Is it truly the right to remain silent after being interviewed for days at a time? While I am a strong supporter of the right against self-incrimination, the closing paragraph of the article summed it up nicely: "the privilege is fulfilled only when…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda or Miranda rights is the name of a warning that is given by an officer to criminals before they are brought into custody. Miranda right is something that tells a criminal his or her own rights to do. This means that the Miranda rights is so important because police officers always must tell people their rights before arresting them, so If the officers don’t tell them anything the person would not know what he or she have to do. So before you are questioned by the police they say you have the right to remain silent, the right to consult an attorney if indigent an attorney will be provided for them, and anything you say will be used against you in the court of law. So if you are caught by an officer and he or she doesn’t say the Miranda…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays