Preview

Powell V Birmingham Jail Case Study

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1666 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Powell V Birmingham Jail Case Study
The Significance of the Right to Effective Counsel in a Criminal Case and Powell v. Alabama
The right to counsel is a fundamental common law principle that aims to set a fair criminal trial. The right to have the assistance of counsel for defence is the right of a criminal defendant to have a lawyer assist in his defence, even if he cannot afford one. This right comes from a variety of sources, the first one being the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which is the part of the United States Bill of Rights that sets forth rights related to criminal prosecutions. 1

The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads:

“In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial
…show more content…
Alabama are a clear statement of the importance of the defendant’s right to counsel in a criminal proceeding. The right to counsel has been the source of much controversy within the U.S. law over the past decades. However, in the light of the words of Justice Sutherland, the failure of the trial court to appoint counsel was found a denial of due process. The Powell case holding declared that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment required that state courts give defendants an opportunity to obtain counsel for defendants in all capital cases who are not able to afford one and an attorney free of charge in noncapital …show more content…
Powell v. Alabama 100 U.S. 1 224 Ala. 524, 531, 540, reversed. [Available at: http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0287_0045_ZS.html (Accessed: 9 November 2013)
Del Carmen, R. (2010). Criminal Procedure: Law and Practice: Law And Practice. Ebook. [Online] Available at: http://books.google.com.tr/books?id=9ctbsWu6vzAC&pg=PA464&lpg=PA464&dq=importance+of+right+to+counsel+in+a+criminal+case+powell+alabama&source=bl&ots=UCzbwHuwXk&sig=i8ogNYxhhGHIDYm0bnuz8FvnlNU&hl=en&sa=X&ei=0Rt-UsvfA82KswalyICICg&ved=0CCMQ6AEwADgK#v=onepage&q=importance%20of%20right%20to%20counsel%20in%20a%20criminal%20case%20powell%20alabama&f=falsehttp://books.google.com.tr/books?id=9ctbsWu6vzAC&pg=PA464&lpg=PA464&dq=importance+of+right+to+counsel+in+a+criminal+case+powell+alabama&source=bl&ots=UCzbwHuwXk&sig=i8ogNYxhhGHIDYm0bnuz8FvnlNU&hl=en&sa=X&ei=0Rt-UsvfA82KswalyICICg&ved=0CCMQ6AEwADgK#v=onepage&q=importance%20of%20right%20to%20counsel%20in%20a%20criminal%20case%20powell%20alabama&f=false
Mosher, J. (2013). ‘Understanding Powell v. Alabama’ Sixth Amendment Center, 17 January [Online]. Available at: http://sixthamendment.org/understanding-powell-v-alabama/ (Accessed: 9 November 2013)
Powell v. Alabama [Online] http://kids.laws.com/powell-v-alabama (Accessed: 9 November

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Tom Robinson’s case in To Kill A Mockingbird resembles many Civil Rights Cases, specifically in the case of Powell vs. Alabama. In Powell vs. Alabama, several young white men…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    McWilliams V Dunn Supreme Court of the United States Introduction The Dunn v. McWilliams case is a famous court case that was heard before the supreme court of United States in April 24, 2017. The case involved James McWilliams as the petitioner against Jefferson Dunn was the commissioner and was representing the Alabama department of corrections. The focus of the case was the sixth amendment of the US constitution was useful in providing for the right to the assistance of an attorney to represent them in defense. However the oral arguments in the case pointed out that it was unclear on whether the defendant’s right to an attorney allows for him to an independent expert who would be devoted in advocating specifically for the defense’s case.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1963 Clarence Earl Gideon presented himself in front of the Supreme Court. Gideon had been indicted for breaking and entering; after defending himself in his preliminary trial he was sentenced to five years in prison. During his time in jail, Gideon did some research on law and wrote an appeal to the Supreme Court. Gideon’s request of representation was on behalf of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The court decided to put the case on trial; it related back to the Betts v. Brady case of 1942. Unlike Betts v. Brady’s 6-3 ruling in which Betts had lost, Gideon won the case with an astounding 9-0 majority. The main issue of the case centers on proper representation of the defendant. In order for the reader to fully understand the scope of the case, he or she needs to consider Betts v. Brady.…

    • 2093 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As we continue through Gideon’s Trumpet, Anthony Lewis continues to explain the complicated process that the Supreme Court takes in hearing a case. There are many instances in which Lewis shows how he is in favor of thick, procedural democracy. Lewis emphasizes the process of judicial review; the prejudice is the court system, the history of ones right to counsel, and how the court was changing at the time. Through these examples, Lewis shows how the Supreme Court is not a perfectly unbiased system; it is quite adequate in its process. However, as this book relates to American Creation, the time and place of the novel played a pivotal role in fate of Clarence Earl Gideon. Throughout this section of Gideon’s Trumpet, Lewis shows that the case of Gideon v. Cochran and later Gideon v. Wainwright was not as important as the time at which the case occurred.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Court held that the Sixth Amendment’s guarantee of counsel is a fundamental right essential to a fair trial and, as such, applies the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In overturning Betts, Justice Black stated that “reason and reflection require us to recognize that in our adversary system of criminal justice, any person brought into court, who is too poor to hire a lawyer, can’t be assured a fair trial unless counsel is provided for him.” He further wrote that the “noble ideal” of “fair trials before impartial tribunals in which ever defendant stands equal before the law, can’t be realized if the poor man charged with crime has to face his accusers without a lawyer to assist him.”…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Carp, Robert A., Ronald Stidham, and Kenneth L. Manning. "chapter 6." Judicial process in America. 8th ed. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press, 2011. 125. Print.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court decided that having counsel is necessary to receive a fair trial. “Gideon transformed criminal prosecutions and generated significant funding for indigent defense nationally.” (273; WEB) Such funding provides all indigents with a defense attorney at the State level regardless of any special circumstances or the severity of the crime. Gideon’s case changed the way the 6th and 14th Amendments were interpreted thus the Federal powers forced the States to recognize this need for all defendants regardless of their incomes to receive a fair trial by way of free legal…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    In 1963, the Supreme Court ruled in Gideon v. Wainwright that the Sixth Amendment guarantees every defendant, regardless of socioeconomic status, the right to an attorney and equal protection under the court of law. This means that an indigent defendant that cannot afford to hire a private attorney may have a public defender appointed to him or her. However, fifty years later, the promises of Gideon v. Wainwright may remain unfulfilled. Public defenders may not be able to provide the same treatment to their clients as a private attorney, resulting in harsher sentences being placed on indigent defendants. This is clearly not the equal treatment that Gideon sought, and it is rather evident that the public defender system is very flawed.…

    • 2715 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gideon Vs Wainwright Case

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Wainwright case that that everyone that ends up going to court has to be appointed a counsel to help defend themselves. People who can’t afford a counsel gets to get one through the state. They might not be the best person to help you though the case, but at least you get somebody to help you defined yourself during court. No matter how much money you have or don’t have you are required to have somebody no matter if you're the one who finds your counsel or if the supreme court finds the counsel for you. You are required to have one no matter what case it is or who it is against, even if they know you won’t come out free they are still inquired to give you a counsel. The impact that this court case made has help a thousand of people today win or lose cases. Hopefully many times it was helping them because your person you get for your counsel is suppose to make your case better and help you out not make it worse for…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Civil Rights Outline Contents Introduction 3 42 U.S.C. § 1983 3 Monroe v. Pape & Related Cases 3 11th Amendment 4 Exceptions to 11th Amendment State Sovereign Immunity 5 The 11th Amendment and § 1983 7 Suits Against Officers 8 Bivens 8 Rejecting or Limiting Bivens 8 Official Immunity 9 Absolute Immunity 10 Legislative Immunity 10 Judicial Immunity 10 Witness Immunity 11 Prosecutorial Immunity 11 Qualified Immunity 12 Sequence of Analysis (“The Order of Battle”) 13 Appealability of the Denial of Qualified Immunity 15 “Reasonableness” 15 Qualified Immunity Comparison with Liability Rules 17 Evolution of Qualified Immunity 17 Governmental Liability 19 Official Policy or Custom 20 Four Incoherences in § 1983 Law 22 Remedies for What Wrongs? 23…

    • 29388 Words
    • 118 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Case Of Powell V. US

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Citation: Powell V U.S. No. 405, Supreme Court of the United States, 1968, 392 U.S. 514, 88 S. Ct. 2145 L. Ed 2d 1254, 1968 U.S. 1140. Facts: Leroy Powell was arrested December, 1966 for public intoxication, which is in violation of Texas state law. Powell was found guilty and fined.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hurst Error Analysis

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In Meeks v. Dugger, 576 So. 2d 713, 716 (Fla. 1991), the petitioner, through proffered evidence, was able to demonstrate exactly how Florida’s unconstitutional pre-Hitchcock capital scheme effected his penalty-phase counsel. This evidence was “sufficient to negate the conclusion that the Hitchcock error was harmless” and this Court remanded his case because “the merits of [Meeks’] claims can only be determined by an evidentiary hearing.” Id. In Hall v. State, 541 So. 2d 1125, 1128 (Fla. 1989), this Court granted relief on evidence preferred outside the original record concerning the effect of the constitutional error on defense counsel, despite the fact that this Court considered the error harmless on the basis of the original record. Appellant is simply seeking the exact same right that this Court has always provided inmates- the ability to develop a record demonstrating the impact of an unconstitutional statute on his trial…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peremptory Challenge

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages

    To demonstrate and answer some of my unanswered questions Kennedy delivers strong cases that clearly shows that race has the potential to impact trial outcomes, such as the Swain v. Alabama and Batson v. Kentucky cases. It is obvious that the fairness of the criminal justice system has been called into question. I never knew that the justice system history in relations to the peremptory challenge caused disadvantages upon blacks until reading Kennedy’s arguments; my thoughts on the peremptory challenge are that it is unfair because a potential juror’s gender or racial orientation should not be grounds for a peremptory challenge. However, I suggest that the larger issue is that it’s easy for lawyers to hide their motives for discriminating against some groups. Equally important, it’s easy for the courts and lawyers to conceal discriminatory motives for so-called peremptory challenges of prospective jurors. The courts have failed to gain recognition and rejection of the practice of excluding blacks from the jury: First by the composition of the jury panels and second in the use of peremptory challenges to remove blacks who reach the panels from which the jury is…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The prosecution can expose whether Witness and Defendant have colluded in an effort to mislead the jury, or, conversely, can clear an innocent defendant. In sum, by granting use immunity and assuming Witness' truthfulness, 2 1 we can avoid the two flaws of convicting an innocent defendant or freeing a guilty defendant. The state of the law in this area invites several observations about evidentiary and constitutional law. Forbidding Defendant from trying to benefit from Witness' assertion of the fifth amendment is an example of the choice evidence law often makes: to exclude problematic evidence rather than to search for ways to help the jury identify and understand estimation problems. Although the import of Witness' privilege assertion is not pellucid, the court could help the jury more than it does in the typical trial by noting the inferences the jury might draw. 22 Alternatively, as this article suggests in Part V, the law might adopt a model of admissibility loosely drawn from discovery rules. Under this model, Defendant (and perhaps any party) could introduce any relevant evidence as long as he shared it with the prosecution far enough in advance of trial to enable the prosecution to investigate. Finally, we need to ask whether Defendant's sixth amendment right to compulsory process includes the right to try to profit from Witness' fifth amendment privilege assertion. Arguably, the sixth amendment topples the categorical rule that no litigant, not even the…

    • 4738 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: Bannai, Lorraine K. “Ex Parte Endo, 323 U.S. 283 (1944).” Encyclopedia of the Supreme Court of the United States. Ed. David S. Tanenhaus. Vol. 2. Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA, 2008. 152-155. U.S. History In Context. Web. 2 Apr. 2013.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays