Preview

Queen Elizabeth

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1847 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Queen Elizabeth
Rhetorical Analysis: Pre-writing

Learning how to identify and analyze rhetorical tools is an important part of the collegiate experience. This handout emphasizes several tools which can aid in the analysis of rhetoric in an effective, well-organized paper.
Questions to Ask Speakers use rhetorical tools in order to appeal to logic (logos), emotion (pathos), or authority (ethos). Asking yourself specific questions regarding the effect of rhetorical tools you encounter is a good place to begin expanding and improving the analysis within your paper. The following are some suggestions to get you started. If the tool has an ethical effect, ask: What authority does the speaker hope his audience will trust? Is the authority of the speaker himself/herself in question, or is it the authority an outside source? Why does the speaker choose that particular kind of authority? What connections is the speaker trying to make in the minds of the audience? Is it likely that the audience will accept this authority? Why or why not? How does establishing trust in this authority help persuade people to trust the speaker? If the tool has a logical effect, ask: Why does the speaker use a logical argument instead of a pathetic or ethical one? What is the audience’s likely reaction to this sort of logical reasoning? How selective or particular is the logic? Is there any evidence of logical fallacy? If so, why? Does the fallacy undermine the argument, or strengthen it? Note: For more information on logical fallacies, see the handout “Logical Fallacies.” Is the speaker using logic to persuade his audience about a highly emotional issue? If so, why? If the tool has a pathetic (emotional) effect, ask: What emotion is the speaker highlighting? Why is that particular emotion highlighted? Why would this emotion would be more powerful for the audience the speaker is addressing? What particular tool is the speaker using to manipulate

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Furthermore, instead of relying on clear, factual evidence that solidifies each point the use of dialogue afterward does quite the opposite. An example of this is, “Demands that immigrants blend into their surroundings” and yet no “demands” take place. Without giving a clear indication of the information and remaining transparent in each of his arguments the vague wording in each point instead of being agreed or disagreed with leaves confusion on problematic choices being made and not being…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Based on an analysis of speeches on Reproduction Rights, I will argue that through the use of rhetoric, many people are being persuaded to have a certain opinion. I will be looking at speeches made by Barack Obama, Mitt Romney, and Hilary Clinton. I am researching this to consider the affects that rhetoric has on an audience and whether or not it is used effectively to achieve the speaker’s goals. By researching this topic I hope to better educate those who are unwittingly influenced by politicians, and teach them how to recognize and avoid it in the future. All of the rhetors I have analyzed use certain rhetorical strategies and vocabulary to persuade the public and target specific groups.…

    • 3303 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kennedy also uses narrative in the form of consubstantiation by creating a deeper connection with the audience through his reference to a statement by Dr. Falwell. Dr. Falwell said, “To stand against Israel is to stand against God”; since the audience is aware of this phrase, Kennedy uses it to create a relationship with the audience by addressing a line that they recognize. Using consubstantiation helps Kennedy create a deeper connection with the audience and furthers his argument of how both sides have similar understandings of moral…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From what I have observed from a day of all the arguments, I have found that logical rhetoric seems to be the most effective argumentation because it appeals to our reasons. We can persuade another person by providing provable facts, data, and numbers, which make it reasonable for them to agree with us. Therefore, the person on the other hand can decide based on the facts I have provided.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When issues such as this are addressed in public it takes the form of an dogmatism ethical fallacies which wants the audience to believe there is no other way to believe but their way, as well as Ad hominem ethical fallacies which attacks a person’s character rather than a person’s reasoning.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Furthermore, instead of relying on clear, factual evidence that solidifies each point the use of dialogue afterwards does quite the opposite. An example of this is, “Demands that immigrants blend into their surroundings” and yet no “demands” are provided. Without giving clear indication of the information and remaining transparent in each of his arguments the vague wording in each points instead of being agreed or disagreed with is left confused on what is the problematic choice and which is…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe the arguments were set up logically, however his personal appeal made it emotional. Because we all sin, it is our human condition to sin again and again; so it is easy to excuse our self for the sin we committed to self satisfy ourselves with our own…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I will use GAD (generalized anxiety disorder) as an example. GAD affects a substantial amount of the population. When addressing this topic, a speaker might first state the factual information, listing the symptoms and the mechanisms behind the disorder. This would be an appeal to logic. Next, the speaker might give their personal story of their struggle with anxiety. This is both an appeal to the emotions and ethics of the audience. Appealing to the ethics of the audience gives the…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Experts add greater weight to an argument and are persuasive because they are more likely to be trusted by the reader…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The speech also contains emotive language which is a good technique if you want the reader to create emotions and aim to make the reader react in some way and to create a strong emotional response. An example of this is “Thousands of lives were suddenly ended by evil …”…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fahnestock, Jeanne, and Secor, Marie. A Rhetoric of Argument. 3rd. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2003. Print.…

    • 2789 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Types of Reasoning

    • 2125 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Thus advocates use the premises they have previously established or asserted, and by a process of reasoning, they try to establish something new—a conclusion they want their audience to accept. If the audience perceives the premises as well grounded and the reasoning as rhetorically sound, it will be likely to accept the conclusion.…

    • 2125 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sample IB Written Task

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages

    he doesn't seem to talk about context, audience, or purpose. So while it does seem to have an argument…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Legal Argumentation

    • 2346 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Department of Speech Communication, Argumentation Theory and Rhetoric University of Amsterdam Spuistraat 134 1012 VB Amsterdam Netherlands e.t.feteris@uva.nl…

    • 2346 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Functional Styles

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages

    is to exert influence on public opinion, to convince the listener that the interpretation given by the speaker is the only correct one and to cause him to accept the point of view expressed in the speech not merely by logical argumentation, but by emotional appeal as well.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays