Pros And Cons Of Assault Weapons

Imagine having a person on your property or in a dangerous situation and all their is is a pistol to defend yourself. Someone could grab the pistol or can hit someone with something. If assault weapons were to be banned then there would be no protection in society. “Encouraging assault weapons for military use is useful because military would not protect the country with a pistol” (Richman). This is showing that the most wanted weapon is an assault weapon because of it power. If someone compares a pistol to a assault weapon there is a power advantage but still can do the same thing with an assault weapon as a pistol can do. Assault weapons should not be banned, there should just be a more stricter law on purchasing a weapon.
First, if assault weapons were banned law enforcement would
Hawaii’s and Maryland’s, for example, deal only with pistols”(Richman). In some states assault weapons are banned and only allow pistols. Their would not be a school shooting with a pistol.
Evidence: Based on the state the more population the more firearm crime is committed. “The variable crime is the number of firearm-related violent crimes committed in a state, relative to the state's population”(Kahane).

Conclusion
Paragraph 6
(No new information - no new quote or detail)

Restate Position (rephrase): Assault weapon should not be banned, there should be a more stricter law for people trying to purchase a assault weapon. With that assault weapons should be used for dangerous situations.

Connect to your hook: When someone is in a dangerous situation when your in your older day and they need to protect yourself there would not be any defence.

Call to Action: The constitution or mayor of a certain state should make the decision based on the crime rate or death ratio buy assault