Preview

Why Guns Should Not Be Banned

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
532 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Guns Should Not Be Banned
Sappreha Darby
English 100
January 8, 2013

Why Guns Should Not Be Banned “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arm, shall not be infringed.” The United States constitution states it itself. It protects the rights of people to keep and bear arms. To ban guns will be violating the constitution. If a citizen in a state feels unsafe in their environment they have a right to own a gun for safety reasoning. If a state government takes that away from the citizen, their safety becomes a hazard for self-protection and more crimes would be committed. Most people think that banning guns will decrease crime rate. Crime will not go down by banning guns since the majority of criminals have unregistered guns. Unfortunately, if the government was to ban all guns, this will increase crime rate instead of decreasing it. No gun restrictions are going to stop a criminal for committing a crime. Criminals are never going to turn in their guns and won’t hesitate to use them. A study conducted by The Department of justice says that guns are used 1 to 1.5 million times a year, to prevent a crime from happening. On the other hand, gun is actually a useful tool in protecting yourself. Guns may be used to harm thousands of people each year. But I have failed to agree that more guns equal more crimes and fewer guns equal fewer crimes. In fact, research would suggest the exact opposite. If the governor ban guns, that will not stop people from killing. It’s not the gun that kills people. It’s the people that kill people. The crime rate has increased over the past 20 years, and is showing no signs of decreasing. In the next 5 to 10 years crime will continue to rise due to the bad economy and people losing their job. Nevertheless, guns are just one of many devices people use to kill. How about all the other devices like knives, ropes, baseball bats, vehicles, and airplanes to name a few, why not ban all

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Many people in America today, see guns as evil; that they are only used for killing people, and think they should be banned all together. In fact, guns save more lives than they take, and prevent more injury than they inflict. Banning guns is not a good idea.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Implementing a gun control policy will not really be effective in making all guns vanish in society. This policy will also not do anything to make guns safer in society. The reality is that guns have become necessary at present so that people can safeguard themselves, their families and their properties from any harm or danger that could be done to them by criminals. Thus, if guns are already banned in society, the people can no longer have access to something that can be very…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another reason why private gun ownership should be banned is because, contrary to popular belief, it is not in the Second Amendment that people are required to own guns for their safety. While it does say that people are justified in owning their personal arms, it does not say that people have a constitutional right to own machine guns, anti-tank weapons or chemical munitions. Theoretically, any part of the constitution, including amendments included in the “Bill of Rights”, can be amended or abolished. The fact that something is in the U.S. Constitution doesn’t make automatically make it right. On the other and, one could argue that there are more in favor of leaving…

    • 113 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that guns should not be outlawed, but in order to buy a gun I believe that everybody should have to go through an evaluation to see if they are mentally stable to own a gun without people having to be scared if they see a person with a gun. By mentally stable I mean not a person that is depressed to the point where they want to kill themselves or another person. People have the right to protect themselves and their families and nobody should be able to take that away from…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are many examples of why guns should not be banned in America. For instance, self defence. If someone breaks into your house, you should have the choice to defend yourself in a life or death situation. I believe that people who buy guns should go through a mandatory background check in order to be able to buy a gun. There are many people today that have planned shootings and have taken many lives in the process.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The most prevalent argument for gun rights is the second amendment to the Constitution of the United States. The second amendment is broken into two clauses; the justification clause and the rights clause. The justification clause is, “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state.” And the rights clause is, “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” This idea is important to a country founded upon revolution, and is in the Constitution for the chance that we will have to revolt again so, as democratic Americans, we cannot allow the government to strip us of our rights. America was founded on the thought of being able to make our own ideas and options for our lives. A free man must be able to protect himself and that was the idea of the founding fathers when they made the second amendment. The act of banning firearms would directly defy what our founding fathers thought best for our nation. Our country was founded on the right to be free from tyranny. Individual ownership of guns was one of those rights to make sure the government couldn’t overrun the people. If the government was to put a ban on weapons, it would make it all the easier for politicians to take over the nation. Gun ownership also made it possible to create local militias to…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment of The United States Constitution says, “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right for the People to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”. Many politicians want gun control to supposedly make the world safer. Even though some politicians may argue that gun control limits violence, gun control should be banned because guns in the hands of noble people give protection and drop crime rates.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The security at places where guns can be bought should be increased. Guns should have an emergency tracker, so that if they are somehow stolen the police can catch the thief. If someone escaped with a stolen gun they would be caught by the police and arrested. It is possible to make a scanner that sends an alarm if the gun detects that someone who is not the owner is using the gun. If someone stole the gun and tried to use it, the gun would send a message to the police and/or the owner so the police could arrest the criminal. The only way to stop criminals with guns is to either to oppose them with another gun or to disable their gun. Banning gun ownership would have many negative impacts. Police officers need guns to defend themselves, so if they own them they will technically be criminals. The people that enforce the law and keep criminals off the streets will be criminals themselves if they have a weapon that they will almost certainly need. According to Wayne LaPierre, the Executive Vice President of the NRA, "The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun" (Should more gun control laws be enacted). If a dangerous person has a gun, then only someone else with a gun can stop him or her without a large number of lives being lost. According to Should More Gun Control Laws Be Enacted in the United States?, “Gun control does not deter crime, gun ownership deters crime” (ProCon.org). Criminalizing guns would just backfire and cause the opposite of what it is supposed to.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The important thing the banning guns will have no effect on the reduction of violent crime, but can increase occurrences of gun crimes. This is due to the fact that civilians would no longer be able to defend themselves effectively.…

    • 654 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Banning guns will greatly decrease the crime, homicide and suicide rates in America. If criminals don’t have the weaponry but the police forces do, the criminals will not stand a chance against them. This will lower the crime and murder rates because the police will be able to stop them and prevent them from injuring or killing anyone. This will ensure safety and peace is maintained in the city. The prohibition of guns will also decrease the amount of massacres in the US. Research has shown that out of the 62 massacres from 1982, 49 of those mass shootings were committed with weapons obtained legally from firearm stores. The banning of guns will have prevented those 49 mass shootings and saved hundreds of lives.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun control will not stop crime, responsible citizens can’t protect themselves effectively, and there can be acceptable regulations for guns. Gun control won’t work. Banning or controlling, whether what is being banned is an item or ideology, has never worked. Prohibition is a strong example of banning an item not working. In 1920 the United States government banned the manufacturing, transportation, and sale of alcoholic beverages (Prohibition, United States).…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Most people link guns and crime in hand with one another. But are the two really associated? Does owning a gun really lead to crime? And if so will passing laws restricting gun owners reduce the crime or protect the citizens? These are some of the questions lawmakers are asking themselves when deciding on what kind of laws they will make for gun owner’s. Owning a gun is a big reasonability, you have to make sure you keep it in a safe place and away from kid, you have to have it locked up at all times and you have to be properly trained on using a firearm. A gun is a powerful weapon they can cause harm or even death, If not utilized the right way, but on the other hand they can be used to defend and protect. In Any way you look at it, guns…

    • 152 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There has been a nationwide debate on gun control recently after the mass shooting in the Auroa theatre in Colorado. Some people believed that the more people owning guns, the more crimes will have in our daily life. They are also trying to connect Canada’s low crime rate with the prohibition of owning a gun in their law. They also believe if we outlaw guns in the US, we should also see a significant drop in murder and crime rate. But in reality the crime rate and murder rate in the US has been steadily dropping for decades even without strict gun control. There is a popular saying “guns don’t kill people, people kills people”. Even we make guns illegal in this country, there is always a black market for it and the criminals can get their hands on it while the law abiding citizen will not have access to the weapon that will protect them and their family. For every aurora or columbine mass shooting, we can always point out to many cases that guns actually save lives from criminals. Just recently before the New Year Eve in 2012, an Oklahoma young mother was able to protect herself and her 3-month-old infant from 2 intruders who was trying to break into her house with a 12-inch long knife. Without the right of owning guns, both her baby and she will sure be harmed in this incident. I would further argue that if every state legalizes concealed weapon, mass shooting rate will actually drop. If everyone is trained in how to properly use a gun and carries a gun in their pocket in columbine, Virginia tech or the aurora theatre, they will be able to fire back at the shooter and minimize the death toll. All criminals would have to think twice about the possibility that they might get killed when they try to steal or rob…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There has been a lot of talk about banning guns lately. There are already many laws on the books that regulate gun ownership. However, criminals need not worry as the black market has no such regulations, and will sell to anyone with the cash to purchase guns. Banning guns is not only unconstitutional, it is an ineffective strategy to combat gun violence. There is nothing preventing anyone from going to any public places and start shooting. If you take away gun rights from those who go through the legal motions then there will be more casualties in the event of a shooting. Guns should be permitted to be carried by persons of verified integrity in gun free zones where the greatest risk of casualties…

    • 125 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It’s understandable that many people want to completely restrict guns because of their personal experiences or tragedies of someone they know dealing with shootings or guns. It’s also understandable that gun laws are passed only to look out for the safety of others. Guns can be really dangerous once it’s placed in the wrong hands. Saying from complete honesty, we can all agree that guns actually do help criminals kill or injure the innocent. Using a gun, a thief can easily rob a bank, or even a psychopath can easily gun down a school with just a press of a trigger. I mean, guns are dangerous right?…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays