In the short article “Disarming Realities: Gun Sales Soar, Gun Crimes Plummet” …show more content…
The city’s murder rate is 15.65 per 100,000 people, compared with 4.5 for the Midwest, and 5.6 for Illinois. “Disarming Realities: Gun sales soar, gun crimes plummet”
This statistic is shocking in itself due to the sheer amount people that could have been saved. Showing statistics like this shows that in states with stricter gun controls aren't always better. The more facts that are presented from this well structured articles the more their argument is validated.
Yet in the general population, and although the agenda-driven media hasn’t noticed, we can be grateful that gun violence has been trending downward since 1993 when it hit its last peak. Don’t want to credit a rise in gun ownership and concealed carry by law-abiding citizens for this good news? Fine. But then, don’t imagine that gun legislation is the reason or answer either. Leave that illusion to gun-control cheerleaders in the media. “Disarming Realities: Gun Sales Soar, Gun Crimes Plummet” in Forbes Magazine
With a closing statement like this they really drive home and validate their point that they are trying to make. Law abiding gun carrying citizens are helping this country destroy gun toting criminals by being a shear …show more content…
Some of the differences between the two articles consist of the structures in which they were written. “Disarming Realities: Gun Sales Soar, Gun Crimes Plummet” in Forbes Magazine was written point by point whereas “Open Carry is an Invitation to Chaos” in US News was written as an opinion based argument. “Disarming Realities: Gun Sales Soar, Gun Crimes Plummet” in Forbes Magazine was determined to prove it’s point to it’s readers by providing an arsenal of facts and statistics. This article was quite informative and focused on the issues at hand on a national level. Giving you a sense of comfort it was as if the author was sitting down with an old friend. “Open Carry is an Invitation to Chaos” in US News focused more on convincing its readers with negative opinions and a few discomforting facts. This article was intended to outrage and dissuade its readers from the importance of the actual subject at hand it. The article only focused on the issues at a state level rather than a national level. The feeling of this essay was very rash and abrupt leaving a bad taste in the