Why it is morally right to enforce gun control in America
Gun control is a very sensitive and controversial topic that has become one of the biggest topics of debate in the United States. Many Americans are against gun control because they feel it is their right as an American to have possession of a firearm for protection. Others are strongly in favor of gun control and feel that there should be laws and regulations put in place that ban the possession and use of firearms. Both sides of the argument are very passionate about their beliefs on gun control and both sides have valid points supporting their stance. Those against it argue that banning firearms is a violation of their rights and by not allowing them to have and/or carry guns, they are being deprived the right to protect themselves with these weapons. On the other hand, those who are for gun control believe firmly in the idea that less guns equals less violence and less crime and would ultimately result in a safer and happier society. There should be gun control laws put in place by the United States government that prohibits the possession and use of any type of firearms, because that is the ethically correct thing to do. The fewer guns there are the better, less people would die as a result of gun violence, there would be reduced crime, and people would not have to worry about their kids being influenced by these weapons.
Laws and regulations that prohibit the possession and/or use of firearms would result in a much safer society and less innocent people having to die because of gun violence. If the American government enforced gun control laws in efforts of trying to reduce gun-related crimes like murder, it would concur with Philosopher Immanuel Kant’s belief that: "the morality of an act depends on the person's intentions, not the end result of the act.” (Clark). In 2012, there were over 30, 000 gun-related deaths in the US, a number that is far, far too high (Clark). On December 14, 2012, a 20-year-old man walked into Sandy Hook Elementary School located in Newtown, Connecticut and took the lives of 20 innocent children and six teachers at the school using a firearm (The Washington Post). This is not the first time such an incident has occurred and it certainly will not be the last if guns are not taken off the streets. Australia is one country that has been enforcing gun control laws since 1996 and since then they have had a 30 percent decline in deaths caused by firearms (Goss). Other countries such as England and Scotland have also had a decline in deaths caused by a firearm since getting rid of guns (Goss). Those in favor of keeping guns, such as the NRA, believe that not only is gun control wrong, but there in fact needs to be more guns, more guns to protect Americans from the many criminals and psychopaths who no matter what will find a way to get their hands on guns illegally. But where is the ethics in that? It is not morally right to stoop down to the level of these criminals and psychopaths and to convince ourselves that it is okay to be carrying around these lethal weapons because we want to feel “protected”. Far too many lives are being lost and far too many families have to suffer through the loss of an innocent loved one who died because of guns. The answer is not more guns; the answer is to get rid of all guns. What needs to be done is to make it as hard as possible for these inhuman individuals who choose to use guns to inflict harm on others to get their hands on these weapons.
With the government enforcing laws that prohibit the possession of guns, crime rates would decrease because criminals would not be accessible to firearms the way they are now. Philosopher Jeremy Bentham advocated utilitarianism and the belief that what differentiates an act between being morally right or wrong is whether or not it pleases the majority, he said that whatever brings the greatest amount of happiness to greatest amount of people should be deemed...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document