Preview

Mock Trial Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1368 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mock Trial Analysis
The mock trial we held in class progressed pretty well within the two days we had. With the amount of time that we had to prep for the trial and the amount of experience we had about trials, we as a class improvised and adjusted perfectly. Our peek was on our second day, when everyone practiced their skills that they accumulated after messing up on the first day. The trial on the first day was a rough one, for everyone had to get into the mindset of what we needed to do, and everyone had no idea what was protocol at the time and what is not. We did not know what we were doing, however by the second day we started to know our roles and everyone got into their own style in completing the task at hand. The first day all we had was knowledge of …show more content…
In a real court case, his testimony would be a little sketchy for if an officer is to testify in court they would know their police report inside and out, otherwise that could show how credible the source is. It is really difficult to be in a court setting and expected to think. Even though we were in a mock trial, when you are on the stand your mind tends to go blank for you are trying to comprehend what is best to do next and thinking what can I do next to make my testimony more realistic. The attorney’s had a rough day the first day, and you can see it in their eyes and poster, they were stuck many times and they were corrected many times by the judge.

The trial overall went well. Everyone lived up to their role and gave their best to making this court case as realistic as possible. There were many instances in our mock trial that would not pass in procedure in a real court case, but this is where the educational aspects come into play. We have no time in and timeouts in the real court procedures, but we learned from our mistakes and we overcame. Everyone participated also started to change their mindset turning the wheels in their head creating questions every time one was asked. This is the key to being a good attorney and winning your side of
…show more content…
It was a great way to test our skills in throwing questions out right off the top of your head. You really had to think hard for you should be four or five questions in when you ask your first question, and you must portray a sense of confidence to get the truth out. A great way to make this experience better is to have more prep time in terms of the two, prosecution and defense councils, to get a better understanding of the case at hand and also have time for them to prepare more thought out and in depth questions. Then the trial would not stop every so often and it would be a pretty smooth way to proceed. Since our class is already so small it was not hard to get the roles distributed and to ensure everyone is in a main role. This was the best part of the trial and we were able to be right in the mix away from the other distractions a full class would have.

Overall, the mock trial we had was a great way to experience what the judicial system is like. With the little knowledge we had, we as a class did well with adjusting and making sure everyone was doing what they were suppose to be doing. I enjoyed all aspects of the trial and I hope we get to participate in something like this again. It was very insightful to see the skills that everyone put to the table and to see what and actual trail would look

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Trial By Jury

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It isn’t arduous to see why some may question the efficiency of trial by jury and whether it should, and is able to, continue to discover innocence or guilt. Regarding the trial of Vicky Pryce, the failure of the jury within the hearing conjured ridicule and disdain from the judge and the media. The case deeply unsettled the trust of many in the system. The eight women and four men were dismissed after illustrating “fundamental deficits of understanding” (Jacobson, Hunter & Kirby, 2015, p. 55). Their profuse questions for the judge were deemed as unintelligent and unnecessary and so a costly re-trial was required. Consequently, this ordeal provoked a stronger desire for the abolition of trial by jury, to be replaced by a single judge as a more…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    On first arriving to the Crown Court I immediately felt a feeling of anxiety, almost as if I was about to stand trial myself. This led me to a moment of reflection on how those around me, the family of those awaiting trial and in some cases those awaiting trial themselves must be feeling. Many anxious faces sat around…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This week was very diverse in the activities that I did. The court review for Jamarion Lawhorn was very interesting. His case happened 3 years ago when he stabbed a boy at a playground and the victim died. Lawhorn was waived as an adult in the case. This reflects the juvenile and adult systems which I was taught about in my classes. When he turns 19 he will be done with the juvenile home and at that time they will have to decide what to do with him. He could still potentially get prison time as an adult. It was nice to know about the systems and how they worked to really understand what could happen in his case in the future.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nix V. Williams Summary

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Evidence has demonstrated that at the time of unconstitutional interrogation, a search was already in place for the victim, and the body would have inevitably been found. This means had there not be illegal conduct by the police officers, the fairness of the trial would have remained the…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    COMMLAW LAW ASSIGNMENT

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A brief summary of what was going on in the trial while you were watching.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Those that have not been exposed to a jury trial might be rather shocked how to process works, not only in criminal matters but also in civil matters as in the case…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mock Trial

    • 1085 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Greeting courtroom members, I am Shaneka Lewis apart of the Defence Attorney and I will be representing my client Donovan Tisi pleading not guilty upon the robbery and bodily harm charges. On December 5th 2013 at 5:30 PM, Anver Williams had claimed to be walking home from his basketball practice where he perhaps had been wearing his brand new basketball sneakers. As Mr. Williams was walking home he decided to take a short-cut home from a dark alley way that leads to Eglinton Ave. As Anver Williams was walking he seemed to come across a group of older men. Anver Williams explained how the young men approached him and toke away his hat and his sneakers after while being brutally attacked. My question and argument court, is to why my client Donovan is being called upon out of all of the young men who had claimed to be there during this dispute, is there enough proof or evidence to show that Donovan Tisi had been there or even took part in this crime, that Anver Williams is not sure of who had harmed or robbed him? As we are gathered here court I would like you all to investigate or try to find real evidence to prove that it had been my client Donovan that shows his participation in this act.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the courtroom there is a group of key players that work together on a daily basis. They are made of a group of professionals. These professional are those who know all aspects of a criminal trial and they work together in performing the duties of the court.…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the prosecution holds the burden of proof, they go first. When the prosecution examines a witness, they ask a chain of questions that that emphasize the elements of the crime and establish proof beyond a reasonable doubt. For the Sandoval case, their goals were to prove that he went back to the scene of the crime with intent to harm or kill, that he was capable of killing and that he did kill the victim. When Sandoval did take the stand, he was forced to answer questions that showed that he had no real reason to go back unless it was motivated through revenge and gave reasons why he would want to get revenge. I think a really effective witness was the paramedic that treated the victim. I thought it was a nice use of the witness because he mentioned details on the stabbing which brought to light that the victim appeared to have more offensive wounds. A strong point was made when the prosecutor mentioned that if it were a self-defense altercation then the victim would most likely have slash-like wounds instead of stab-like wounds. By far I think the worst witness for the prosecution would have been Officer Gassman. He did not submit adequate reports which I believe had a significant impact on the case. With respect to the prosecutions examinations, the defense got to cross-examine the witnesses. His goal was to show that the…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As we walked into the jury room, after hearing the case of Commonwealth v. Miller, I had already decided how I would vote and, honestly, I determined I was not going to be swayed. We swiftly chose a foreman by appointing the one, who had been given the jury instructions, to that position. Next, we read the jury instructions out loud, in order to remember and understand the definition of each charge. Debate over the meaning of the instructions ensued for a short amount of time before we dove into determining guilt or innocence. Everyone was given a chance to discuss the case and, personally, I felt comfortable entering the discussion and debating the case. After discussion, we voted and were evenly split among guilty or not guilty. Next, we…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Courtroom Workgroups

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In conclusion, I feel I have explained the basic elements and operations of a sociocultural system known as a courtroom workgroup. I have also learned why there is not very many trials, and when there is one, why it is such a big…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Courtroom Workgroups

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Making changes to the courtroom work group is a good idea. Although, everyone is a key player, removing one of them could put a lot of people in harm’s way, wrongfully imprisoned, and make biased decisions. I would recommend that those that have never been a witness in a trial or that have never participated in courtroom proceedings, that the courtroom operations be explained to them so they would know what to…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Schedule

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For my court observation, I was able to sit in a Texas State District Court. The judge of the court I observed was Honorable Judge Etta J. Mullin. Everything was pretty much what I expected to see. I wasn’t expecting anything outrageous to happen like on the television. I was expecting everything to be very professional and very boring, like watching the C-SPAN channel.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Court Essay

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Court I attended was Court of Justice. On March 21 2013 after my classes and I got there on time for the court session at 11:00 a.m. It was my first time entering court, the security was very strict, they looked through my purse and made me take everything out of my pockets. After the security check I started looking for courtrooms with trials going on I entered a very interesting Courtroom 10 on the 6th floor. There was many people waiting in that courtroom including attorneys, but the attorneys were standing by the defendants. The trail was open to the public’ the crown stated the facts about the ( ) this wasn’t a jury trail the judge made the decision.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Due Process

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A jury trial is a vital stage in the process; all of the investigation that has taken place concerning the accused person will be presented during this process. A jury trial is made up of twelve citizens of the community who have been randomly selected to serve on the jury. The jury had been given the authority to judge the facts of the case, and them apply the law that was given by the judge to those facts, and render a verdict of guilty or not guilty.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays