Preview

Managers: Classical Management Functions

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1251 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Managers: Classical Management Functions
Management has existed since the early days of humanity, Egyptians building pyramids and the Chinese irrigation systems etc. Classical management writers rose in the time of the industrial revolution in Europe and emphasized on a more formal approach to management. But since the beginning of the implementation of the managerial work, it has been consistently unclear as to what is the nature of a manager’s work? This question has been the basis of numerous texts and discussions over the years. Stephen J. Carrol and Dennis J. Gillen (1987) have tried to answer this question to the closest possibility in terms of practical implementation by comparing and analyzing the works of different scholars.

The classical management functions as per Fayol (1949), define a managers work to be the one pertaining to planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating and controlling. Over the period of time, multiple managerial books and academic journals have been based on the subdivisions of these five principles as per the theories of Miner (1971). But Mintzberg (1975) questioned Fayol’s classical managements functions and devised his own typology, which, like the classical functions, was gradually implemented in the academic world, but the two were never integrated in any study. Even other author’s like Kotter (1982) and Stewart (1974
) have published their own typologies, which do not agree with the classical management functions. It has been clear due to such observations that author’s are having some difficulty in handling and converging these diverse perspectives on managerial work into one model of study. This academic paper elaborates more on the works by Fayol and Mintzberg, while addressing the key issue of whether the classical function is still relevant in today’s organizations or if Mintzberg model was more accurate in defining the theoretical description.

Henri Fayol was the first person to identify elements or functions of management. His five divisions of a



References: Brooks, I. (2009). Organisational behaviour: Individuals, groups and organisation. . (4th ed.). Essex: Pearson Education Limited Carrol, S., & Gillen, D Fayol, H. (1949). General and industrial administration. London: Sir Issac Pitman & Sons, Ltd. Fells, M. (2000). Fayol stands the test of time. (pp. 345-360). Kotter, P. (1982). The general managers. New York: Free Press. Lamond, D. (2004). . a matter of style: reconciling henri and henry. 42(2), pp. 330-356). Miner, B. (1971). Management theory. New York: Macmillan. Mintzberg, H. (1975). The manager 's job: Folklore and fact. (pp. 49-61). Pryor, G., & Taneja, S. (2010). Henri fayol, practitioner and theoretician – revered and reviled. (pp. 489-503). Stewart, R Wren. (1994). The evolution of management thought. (4th ed.). New York: NY: John Wiley.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Compare and contrast the traditional roles of managers presented by Fayol’s early writings with more contemporary research of Stewart and Mintzberg. Support your answers with examples.…

    • 1976 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Management Reflection

    • 1548 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Fayol is also famous for the classical ‘school of management’ in which command and control is emphasized and published in “General and Industrial management” which is still highly referred to a century later. Fayol taught that management was comprised of five major components: Planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating and controlling.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Managerial Perspective

    • 2975 Words
    • 12 Pages

    A manager is essentially a person that gives direction, provides leadership and decides how to use resources to accomplish organizational goals (Daft, 2008). As a person having been in the workforce for almost twenty-five years, I can say with experience, that managers and the methods they use to obtain organizational goals can make the difference between success and failure of a project and even an organization. A managerial philosophy is something that all managers develop over time as a result of their experiences in the workplace. Over the last twenty years I have been exposed to a variety of business and managers that have helped me shape my personal managerial philosophies that I currently employ on the job. Before I get into the exact philosophy that I apply in the workplace it is important to know a few aspects about my past experience and some of the roles I have played to truly understand the rationale for my personal managerial philosophy.…

    • 2975 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Contemporary Management

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The essay will endeavor to provide an insight into how Fayol’s basic principles of Classical Management Functions are indeed useful in describing managerial work. In the last (20th) century, the role of managers in business becomes more diverse as the number of tasks in which businesses were involved in significantly grew in quantity and complexity. As a result there was an increased interest in the most effective and efficient method of management. This led to the development of different management theories, which included classical management functions which one (1) could argue led to management being defined as the process of organizing tasks through employees to make sure that goals and objectives are met efficiently. (Robbins, Bergman, Stagg, Coulter 2006, p. 9).…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The classical school of management has sought to define the essence of management in the form of universal fundamental functions. These, it was hoped, would form the cognitive basis for a set of relevant skills to be…

    • 2157 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    in order to appreciate and probe the management and its ensuing problems and the man.agerial roles and events, ete. Some years ago, an author who attempted to classify the various "schools" of management theory called this situation "the management theory jungle" [1]. Certainly, it could be observed that many different approaches were diversely categorised by different authors. Familiarity with the approaches to management analysis can help one appreciate many insights, ideas and help one avoid re-examining previously known ideas. Figure 1 summarises the various approaches to management analysis in the foUowing categories [2]. As seen in Figure 1, one of these approaches is Managerial Roles Approach that will be strived to explain in the following section. 2. TIIE MANAGERIAI.. ROLES APPROACH The Managerial Roles Approach which is one of the newer approaches to management analysis has been popularised by Henry Mintzberg. Mintzberg has given this approach higher visibility although many researchers have studied the actual work of managers. This approach is related to the Work-Activity SchooL. The Work-Activity School of management deals with the actual activities of managers which are analysed systematicaUy and conclusions are drawn only…

    • 2694 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whereas Fayol’s management theories were attained through experience in the management discipline, Mintzberg’s management theories on the contrary were attained through research as an academician. Tripathi, Tripathi & Reddy (2008) argue that the two authors have differing views on management but, not competing. In short, they both have contributed valuable theories in management. Additionally, Wook Yoo, Lemak & Choi, (2006) posit that Mintzberg’s work in this discipline was to elaborate and reaffirm Fayol’s managerial concepts. However, not all authors agree to the fact that Fayol and Mintzberg’s work were complementary. Indeed, Golden Pryor & Taneja (2010) holds a different view by stating that Mintzberg’s work was very critical of Fayol’s work often disregarding Fayol’s concepts on management as ‘folklore’ in comparison to findings by Mintzberg attained through systemic research. This is a clear indication of the differing opinions various authors have on Fayol’s…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The ability and means by which an organisation is run, requires for strong managerial expertise and leadership. The ability to realistically plan, organise resources effectively and efficiently, co-ordinate and control resources in this every changing, complex, dynamic environment is at the forefront of quality managerial practices. Good management has demonstrated itself more important than ever, with the peak Global Financial crisis in 2008/2009 proving that the historical theory’s and innovations in managerial practices are absolutely paramount to thriving economic prosperity. It is through the functions, approaches included in the literature of Henri Fayol’s 1949 English translated General and Industrial Management, Henry Mintzberg’s studies into managerial roles and German sociologist and economist Max Weber’s concept of bureaucracy that acknowledge and promote guidelines, expectations and accountability from managers. The extent, to which modern day management upholds and applies all three of these historical studies/ theories into modern management practices will be basis for coherent, strong, fully functioning and ultimately successful leadership. Although contextually theses theorists devised their work at different times in history, the underlying concepts are universal and valid. These theories foundations are undoubtedly necessary and are clearly applicable to contemporary modern day management.…

    • 2284 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This paper attempts to evaluate the usefulness of the classical management functions perspective for describing managerial work and…

    • 2884 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This essay will explore the differences between the theories and the reality of a manager’s job - what he really does. Keeping in mind the complexity of this topic, the large number of theories in the management science and the fact that there is no one and only theory of management, this essay will concentrate on different approaches and go into this topic on the basis of 2 selected theories. Corresponding examples will show that these theories are not always working in reality. Afterwards the whole topic will be summarised and a conclusion will be drawn about an ideal approach in management.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Henry Fayol was the first to propose a general theory of management. He defined theory as “a collection of principles, rules, methods, and procedures tried and checked by general experience.…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Henri Fayol biography

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Henri Fayol (* 1841 in Konstantinopel- Istanbul; † 1925 in Paris) was a French management theorist whose theories concerning scientific organisation of labour were widely influential in the beginning of 20th century. Often associated with Frederick Winslow Taylor, his theories deal with the organisation of production in the context of a competitive enterprise that has to control its production costs. Fayol was the first to identify the four functions of management: planning, organizing, directing, and controlling, although his version was a bit different: plan, organize, command, coordinate, and control. He believed that the number of management principles that might help improve an organization's operation is potentially limitless. Henri Fayol graduated from the mining academy of St. Etienne (École des Mines de Saint-Étienne) in 1860.…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Early theorists such as Henri Fayol (1841 – 1925) described managerial role as planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating and controlling. In the early part of 20th century, his theory did help managers to manage more effectively (Mind Tools Ltd, 1996 – 2013). However, Fayol might have overlooked the external factors that might affect managers. Then, in 1973, Henry Mintzberg published his own theory of management roles. His approach is somewhat different from Fayol’s as he highlights the importance of building interpersonal relationship. This is more relevant to today’s organizational structure as most are operating under ‘open system’, where external factors are open to affect managers (Daft, 2001). Thus, Fayol’s theory is more relevant to be perceived as functions instead of roles in today’s management idea.…

    • 1889 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    One such author, Henry Fayol (1841 – 1925), known as the father of modern management, was Europe’s most distinguished management author and the first to develop a general theory of management. He maintained that management is “to forecast and to plan, to organize, to command, to co-ordinate and to control”. The basis of his theory is that organizational activities can be classified into technical, commercial, financial, security, accounting or managerial activities.…

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Management Theories

    • 4498 Words
    • 18 Pages

    We have much pleasure in enclosing our Term Paper on “some selected theories and concept of management” for the course ‘Advanced Management’, under your kind supervision and cooperation.…

    • 4498 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics