Preview

Lab Sheets

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1468 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Lab Sheets
BB 1704: COLLABORATIVE TECHNOLOGIES

Academic Year: 2012-13

Semester: Spring

Session: 1(a)

Date: Thursday 31st January 2013

Title: Wikis

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------
Objectives: To gain an understanding of the wiki concept by examining wikis such as WikiWiki and Wikipedia.
-------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------- To compare different wiki systems.
-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------
Outcomes: You should be able to search a wiki, and to edit a page in a wiki, such as Wikipedia. You should also be able to create new pages and to create links from existing pages.

Carry out the following, and answer the questions, writing appropriate details in your log book:

1. Using a search engine or otherwise, find out as much as you can about “Wikis”, and their inventor. Write details in your log book. Note that you will get different results by using different search engines. You might, for example, find this one if you use Altavista – http://computer.howstuffworks.com/wiki.htm but it’s probably not on the first page in Google. Don’t just take the very first item in the first search engine you try. By all means read it, but you should look at others as well in order to get a feel for what these things are. Don’t always use Google – there are other search engines. Although Google is very good, sometimes other search engines do better, and sometimes it is more useful to use a search engine which accesses specialized databases.

You should also try typing in different search terms, such as “wiki”, “Wikis”, “What is a Wiki?”, “What are Wikis?” etc. You will very probably get some different results this way, and some will be better than others. You are expected to evaluate the results, and make your own decisions about which describe wikis (or



References: Leuf,B and Cunningham, W (2001), The Wiki Way, Addison-Wesley , Note: All the URLs cited in this document were accessible or tested on 31st January, 2013.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    STurner Assignment Unit3

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages

    a. Why are wikis, forums and blogs not considered valid sources for academic research? Minimum 50 words. I think that wikis, forums and blogs are not valid sources for academic research because these are all contributed to by regular people who base their input on their own opinions and findings, not by reading it or citing it from any type of academic text. These are all based on personal findings and not referenced to any type of reference book in any way.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    |Wikipedia |Wikipedia is not a reliable source. It is an online encyclopedia where that |It is not a validity source. The web site has no peer review and the information can |…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author’s purpose is to testify about his experience with Wikipedia and persuade the intended audience that Wikipedia is not a credible or…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unit 14 P1

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Internet provides a variety of information and communication facilities with the use of standardised communication protocols. The World Wide Web is an information system, allows document to be connected to other documents by hyperlink text. They are formatted in a mark-up language called HTML; this supports links to other documents. This allows you to jump from one document to another simply by clicking on hot spots.…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. Research your assigned topic. (Complete a search for each of the main ideas / proper nouns.)…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jimmy wales

    • 561 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Main point A: Wikipedia was only a simple dream of Jimmy Wales, to build a “growing-content” encyclopedia. (Jimmy Wales, n.d.)…

    • 561 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ldr/531

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Wikipedia is a virtual library that offers its readers a diverse range of information from articles, books, dictionary, references, thesaurus, timelines, and current events.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Inf 103

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Wikipedia has been a successful source of information.Wikipedia does have a wealth of knowledge. I have used it a lot to find facts about different people, places, and books. It is a convenient way to look up information. It is a temporary solution to research. However when you are doing research Wikipedia is not a credible source nor is it recommended by professors. Anyone can post material on Wikipedia as stated in the disclaimer. So this information does not necessarily have to be the most accurate. This information could be old the facts may not…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lab Paper

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to our results, the hypothesis would be true. Although, I reject the hypothesis. Some men can very well have a larger head size and be more intelligent than a woman, but same could be said for women. Simply measuring the circumference of one's head could never actually tell you how intelligent someone is. The best way to accurately say that men are smarter than women is to actually test their intelligence with a series of tests in different subjects such as Math, Science and History.…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philip Lau, writer of the essay, “The Limitations of Wikipedia”, is successful in persuading his readers that the webpage Wikipedia should not be used for college level research. In his essay, Philip states that, “Wikipedia can be a beneficial starting point in gaining general information on a subject but users should be wary of incorrect information”. The essayist’s use of examples, facts and quotes are what makes his argument so convincing.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Mark Wilson’s article “Professors Should Embrace Wikipedia”, Wilson argues that despite the legitimacy of Wikipedia, educators should engage and take part in helping shape the direction of Wikipedia. In a test published in the journal “Nature”, articles in Wikipedia are said to be as revered as those in the “Encyclopedia Britannica.” Since the perceived lack of academic authority, Wilson suggests that those with research specialties should enroll as editors of Wikipedia to add, control, and learn from the information being provided. Wilson describes his own interaction with Wikipedia and how he, his students, and other colleagues have benefitted from the use of it. From becoming a Wikipedia editor and a collaborator with other colleagues, Wilson has “in turn taught some people how to properly reference ideas and information.” Wilson expresses his ideas to involve scholars with Wikipedia to make it more useful to students and the public. Wilson argues that Wikipedia is a source that although warned from, students will go to anyway to start projects, look up terms, and go for general information. If Wikipedia is “the largest coherent store of information and ideas” as stated by Wilson, then “teacher and scholars should have been on this train years ago for the benefit of our students and professions.”…

    • 885 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * In a basic web, you put a main topic in the center of the page and draw lines radiating from it with words that relate to that main topic at the end of every line. You create a web of related words.…

    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia available to everyone. If a person needs information on a subject they no longer need an entire set of encyclopedias in their home. They can simply use Wikipedia on their computers or other devices that have access to the internet. With tools like Wikipedia any information we need is at our fingertips. Much of it available in multiple languages. There are many branches of Wikipedia. Just to name a few, there is Wikibooks, Wikiquotes, and Wikinews.…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is Wikipedia Inaccurate?

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Centuries have passed, whereas man has sought a means to share their stories, some were factual whereas others were simply factually based. In either case, the methods used throughout the years have transformed from cave drawings into endless amounts of data unified through the internet. Taking advantage of technological advances, Wikipedia has arguably become the predominant source for providing information across the globe. However, its success is completely based on its users to add and edit all data presented. Controversially, the information does not go through any real vetting process before worldly presentation, therefor worth no more than cave drawings or old wives’ tales.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    b) “Anyone with Internet access can write and make changes to Wikipedia articles, except in limited cases.”…

    • 1121 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics