Preview

Is Wikipedia Fair Or Inaccurate?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
409 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Is Wikipedia Fair Or Inaccurate?
Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia available to everyone. If a person needs information on a subject they no longer need an entire set of encyclopedias in their home. They can simply use Wikipedia on their computers or other devices that have access to the internet. With tools like Wikipedia any information we need is at our fingertips. Much of it available in multiple languages. There are many branches of Wikipedia. Just to name a few, there is Wikibooks, Wikiquotes, and Wikinews. Wikipedia is composed by voluntary and at times anonymous contributors. Unless an article is protected it can be edited by anyone. This can prove to be both beneficial and detrimental to users. This makes it more comprehensive and up to date. But it can also make it false or inaccurate if someone submits or edits in false information. An editor could do this knowingly or unknowingly. They …show more content…
They try to encourage contributors to register and by having guidelines that they encourage them to follow. Encouraging people to only add verified sources and to cite these sources. To keep the peace, mediate, and monitor the pages there are administrators and editors that have been elected into roles that have authority over the pages. These administrators or system operators “have been granted the technical ability to perform certain special actions on the English Wikipedia. They include the ability to block and unblock user accounts and IP addresses from editing, edit fully protected pages, protect and unprotect pages from editing, delete and undelete pages, rename pages without restriction, and use certain other tools” as described by Wikipedia (en.m.wikipedia.org). Though these administrators try, they can’t watch every edit or every page on Wikipedia. When writing an essay or doing research one should never solely depend on information found on Wikipedia. Always back up your research with other

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    |Wikipedia |Wikipedia is not a reliable source. It is an online encyclopedia where that |It is not a validity source. The web site has no peer review and the information can |…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jimmy wales

    • 561 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Jimmy Wales set his life goal as creating a free-online encyclopedia of the highest possible quality to everyone on the planet in their own languages,that was original model of Wikipedia.…

    • 561 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ldr/531

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Wikipedia is a virtual library that offers its readers a diverse range of information from articles, books, dictionary, references, thesaurus, timelines, and current events.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wikipedia does not have an apocalyptic view about this because its core audience knows the site very well and it has all the necessary experience to get exactly what they want. The loyal users use internal searches or they head directly to the page they want to see. This somehow works like in the case of the top affiliate networks. People know what they want and where they should go to find it.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Inf 103

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Wikipedia has been a successful source of information.Wikipedia does have a wealth of knowledge. I have used it a lot to find facts about different people, places, and books. It is a convenient way to look up information. It is a temporary solution to research. However when you are doing research Wikipedia is not a credible source nor is it recommended by professors. Anyone can post material on Wikipedia as stated in the disclaimer. So this information does not necessarily have to be the most accurate. This information could be old the facts may not…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    dsfsdsfs

    • 4483 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Dear Wikipedia readers: We are the small non-profit that runs the #5 website in the world. We have only 175 staff but serve 500 million users, and have costs like any other top site: servers, power, programs, and staff. Wikipedia is something special. It is like a library or a public park. It is like a temple for the mind, a place we can all go to think and learn. To protect our independence, we 'll never run ads. We take no government funds. We survive on donations averaging about $30. Now is the time we ask. If everyone reading this gave $3, our fundraiser would be done within an hour. If Wikipedia is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online and ad-free another year. Please help us forget fundraising and get back to Wikipedia. Thank you.…

    • 4483 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wikipedia can be beneficial to the academic student as well as the general researching public. Wikipedia covers an immense variety of topics that is continually maintained and updated, relevant, and non-biased in its presentation of information. Wikipedia possess all the qualities a reliable source would have. Wikipedia’s premise is promoting involvement of the general public for inputting information and continually adding into a comprehensive knowledge base.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philip Lau, writer of the essay, “The Limitations of Wikipedia”, is successful in persuading his readers that the webpage Wikipedia should not be used for college level research. In his essay, Philip states that, “Wikipedia can be a beneficial starting point in gaining general information on a subject but users should be wary of incorrect information”. The essayist’s use of examples, facts and quotes are what makes his argument so convincing.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, just because it has a lot of information doesn’t mean that it is all good information. Academic writing is a very accurate type of writing that can require many unbiased, reliable, credible, and relevant sources. I do not think all Wikipedia articles are held to these standards and so, I do not believe Wikipedia is an acceptable source for academic writing. Wikipedia is largely supposed to be an unbiased source by their own standards. However, not all articles are monitored enough to keep people’s biases from sticking through their writing.…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Critical Thinking

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The term management in all business and organizational activities is the act of coordinating the efforts of people to accomplish desired goals and objectives using available resources efficiently and effectively. The main purpose of general interest is to provide information in a general manner and Wikipedia does that. I consider this source to be somewhat credible because it is the substantive news or general interest category but also a popular resource according to definition of scholarly. I guess it is scholarly, because it is concerned with academic study and is viewed as scholarly with respect to the currency of information that is up to date.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To create a believable fake wikipedia page, you have to be thorough. First off, log into wikipedia or create an account. Don’t give them your email address because they will not let you make another account if your original account gets banned. To get into the editing screen. Click on the “edit” tab next to the wikipedia search bar in the top right corner. This will take you to the editing area. Now, what you will want to edit is the first paragraph, where the basic information is. To get there, you need to scroll through a few lines of coding to where it looks like a paragraph starts. To know it the first paragraph, check the first sentence to make sure that it is the same as it is in the normal page. Once you have found the first paragraph, make your edits that would convince the reader to believe your story. Try to elaborate and back it up with more facts. Adding details is the best way to make it more believable, which is your goal. Be creative, but most of all, be as believable as…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the reasons Wikapedia should be more censored is that Wikapedia sometimes post false information on their website. This occurs because anybody can post forums and other opinions on the website which is not checked to make sure that they are true. This makes it extremely difficult for high school and college students to research accurate information, which can effect themselves academically. This is also a problem for the public in general because there…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Website Credibility

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The best example I can give for non-creditable sources are wiki-sites www.wiki.ask.com , www.wikipedia.org , though Wikipedia is a dot org site, like its other counterparts wiki-sites anyone can create an account and change the information at will. There has been may time I took information form wiki as fact and later found it bias…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    information. Wikipedia has proven to be too unreliable for a variety of reasons for it to be trusted…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Source Criticism

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    They have a lot of information on the site, I cannot find any reasons for them to distort the information, or make out a financial use of it, since it is free to use as well as no ads or sponsors, their purpose is mainly to inform. Although they have not written out where they get their information from, so their articles could be filled with a lot of wrong information. Also we cannot know for sure if the information they have is original or if it’s copied from somewhere else. As expected the specific article about reformation in England (the article I got directed to) has information that’s not consistent with other trustworthy sources, e.g.: NE, where DKIEL and NE’s years differs with around 5 years and NE is considered a trustworthy source.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays