Preview

Unit 2 Research Paper Assignment

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
925 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Unit 2 Research Paper Assignment
The United States to 1877
History 1301
McGaughy
Research Paper Assignment
Each student enrolled in this course will write a research paper topic on a subject of their own choosing that pertains to the history of the United States between 1763 to 1791. Students must select the topic of their paper by either Monday, 8 September 2014 (for classes that meet on
Mondays and Wednesdays) or Tuesday, 9 September 2014 (for classes that meet on Tuesdays and
Thursdays). A list of suggested topics will be provided to students to assist them with the process of deciding on a topic. PLEASE NOTE: Students who have not selected a topic by the posted deadline for their class will have 25 points deducted from their overall Research Paper grade.
THERE
…show more content…
Primary sources represent first-hand accounts, or eyewitness testimony. Primary sources include
(but are not limited to) letters, diaries, journals, newspaper articles published at the time the events took place, and books written by participants in the events. Secondary works are books and articles written after the events transpired by someone who was not a direct participant in the events. Please Note: The Research Paper assignment will require library research, which entails the use of printed resources along with Internet-based resources. Students will have to carefully select the
Internet-based resources before using them. There is a strong possibility that students may have to rely upon resources available at nearby universities if those items are not available through the
HCC library. Under no circumstance are students allowed to use Wikipedia as a source of information. Wikipedia has proven to be too unreliable for a variety of reasons for it to be trusted as a source of information.
The Theme identifies the specific topic of the research paper by answer the questions who,
…show more content…
There is no optimum length for the research paper, but the research paper should not exceed fifteen pages.
2. In the upper-right corner of the title page put your first and last name, the title of the course, the course identification numbers, and the date that the final draft of the research paper is due. In the center of the title page place the title of the research paper.
3. Put your last name and the page number in the upper-right hand corner of each subsequent page following the title page and topic approval sheet using the header feature on Microsoft Word.
4. Pay attention to grammar. Take time to carefully proofread your work before turning in the final draft. Students are strongly encouraged to submit work to Ask Online and have their papers reviewed for grammar errors before submitting their final drafts. See course syllabus for more details regarding Ask Online.
5. At the end of the research paper as part of a separate section include a bibliography of both primary sources and secondary works used in your research, both print- and
Internet-based resources.
6. Document your research throughout your paper by using footnotes indicating the extent to which you used the items presented in your

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Write a paper of no more than 700 words discussing the research principles found in the assigned reading a...…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    |Wikipedia |Wikipedia is not a reliable source. It is an online encyclopedia where that |It is not a validity source. The web site has no peer review and the information can |…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jimmy wales

    • 561 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Main point A: Wikipedia was only a simple dream of Jimmy Wales, to build a “growing-content” encyclopedia. (Jimmy Wales, n.d.)…

    • 561 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ldr/531

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Wikipedia is one of the most sought out information website. Jimmy Wales, founder says this about his website, “Wikipedia is something special…, it is a place we can all go to think, to learn and share our knowledge with others” (Wikipedia, 2012, p1). This resourceful tool has up-to-date news, press releases, and it provides its users with the convenience to various languages. In this paper team C will debate on supporting arguments for Wikipedia and opposing arguments if it is credible and a valid source of information.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philip Lau, writer of the essay, “The Limitations of Wikipedia”, is successful in persuading his readers that the webpage Wikipedia should not be used for college level research. In his essay, Philip states that, “Wikipedia can be a beneficial starting point in gaining general information on a subject but users should be wary of incorrect information”. The essayist’s use of examples, facts and quotes are what makes his argument so convincing.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Purpose Of College

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages

    she desires by use of obtainable resources such as books, videos, online tutorials, etcetera. A…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wikipedia is a collaborative resource, which aims to be a compendium of all human knowledge. In a serious examination of Wikipedia as a credible and valid source of information we need to place our argument within a definable framework. As I will show information has many uses, for the purposes of this paper I will examine the use of Wikipedia for scholarly research, the kind, which I will be utilizing throughout the rest of my MBA program. I will be evaluating Wikipedia based on the parameters set forth by Brenda Spatt. The credentials, Impartiality, style/tone, and currency of Wikipedia will all be examined in this paper (Spatt 2011).…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is Wikipedia Inaccurate?

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Unlike an encyclopedia, Wikipedia changes by the hour, which both lend to its popularity and to seemingly its credibility. Although these strengths maintain Wikipedia at the forefront of information gathering processes, it consequently creates a hidden weakness and false confidence. Within both examples, you’ll see the willingness of people to simply create truths rather than identify failure as well as a demonstration of truth by majority. However, neither instance is factually correct and when building upon a false foundation, could lead to your work crumbling beneath your…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Who Says, Chapter Five: “The Wikipedia Problem: Evaluating and Trusting Sources in a Digital Age” By Deborah Holdstein and Danielle Aquillne…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wikipedia is not necessarily anti-academic but it is anti-elitist as evidenced by the short shrift given to eminent academics in debates when they expected deference (see Keen 2007, 43[pic]4). Second, the non-proprietary nature of Wikipedia cuts against academic culture which valorises the rights of the author and publisher. Third, the anonymity of Wikipedia articles is alien to the cache of the named writer of the journal article or book. Fourth, the collaborative process challenges the norm of individual creation, prevalent in the arts and social sciences. Fifth, as intimated, Wikipedia departs from the standard mode of vetting by peer review. It is not true that articles are not reviewed. On the contrary, they…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wikipedia and Reliability

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I’m always trying to find new efficiencies in all aspects of my life, weather it be a super effective 30 minute workout with Jillian Michael’s BodyShred, or when researching for an upcoming assignment. One resource that I’ll suggest is Wikipedia, and I’m not the only person who will; “It’s an online information source that is increasingly used as the first, and sometimes only, stop for online encyclopedic information.”(Kapila, D., & Royal, C. 2009)…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    wikipedia is a reliable?

    • 847 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the editorial, “Wikipedia” (2001), Wikipedia explains that Wikipedia is freely edit, multilingual, and free internet cyclopedia that it is supported by nonprofit Wikipedia foundation. Wikipedia supports its assertion by explaining how Wikipedia is an effort to create, and volunteers worldwide freely write their articles and using their own language. The websites purpose is to explain how Wikipedia can be used as reference data in order to anyone who can access any sites and can edit any of articles. Wikipedia has also become known as a new source because of the rapid data of articles related to breaking news. Wikipedia in the editorial, “Bruno Mars”, asserts that Bruno Mars is a one of the famous American singer and song writer as well. Wikipedia supports its assertion by explaining he is regard as a one of the successful solo artist. Wikipedia’s purpose is to inform about what his success story in order to know who he is. Wikipedia is an unreliable source for academic work because anyone can edit randomly onto this website for free and can change article’s information anytime. Moreover, main problem is still associated with the common contributors who are students rather than professors.…

    • 847 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Over the years that Wikipedia has been running, there has been a continuous debate on whether it is a reliable resource or not and no one has been able to come up with a conclusion. However, there are many people who think that they have come up with a compromise, which includes Wikipedia being a good source for basic information but not for the sole information of any given topic. Especially for college students, Wikipedia can get tricky in the sense where it is easy to just read through and agree with; however, it may be misleading and have incorrect information. People including college English instructor Jenny Meister, Marquette University Law School student blogger Jessica Slavin, and Internet executive Mark Moran can all agree that Wikipedia is helpful in college research but only for basic knowledge, not for sole information.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    • List threes sources – ONE ORIGINAL SOURCE (BOOK) + TWO JOURNALS you (think) will use for information (this can change, if need be)…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Wikipedia

    • 276 Words
    • 1 Page

    Firstly, I opened Google Search Engine and printed there the key words: Wikipedia – valuable – research. Then I used related terms as reliable, credible, source. My next step was to read background information on different sites and look for main ideas and issues being discussed, the terminology is being used. I built my statements: 1) Wikipedia AND credibility; 2) Value n5 Wikipedia; 3)Wikipedia AND credible OR valuable OR reliable OR trustworthy AND source OR resource. I used the sites of different universities, because I consider them as the most suitable and credible. The main reason why Wikipedia isn't a valuable research tool is: anyone who wants can post material, and the expertise of the posters is not taken into consideration.…

    • 276 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics